Cargando…

Rotational alignment of femoral component with different methods in total knee arthroplasty: a randomized, controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Femoral component rotation (FCR) is one of the most important factors in total knee arthroplasty. In this prospective study, we used three different techniques for FCR and analyzed their accuracy with postoperative axial computed tomography (CT) images. We also evaluated effect of FCR to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Joon Kyu, Lee, Sahnghoon, Chun, Sae Hyung, Kim, Ki Tae, Lee, Myung Chul
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5445333/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28545525
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-017-1574-5
_version_ 1783238865295769600
author Lee, Joon Kyu
Lee, Sahnghoon
Chun, Sae Hyung
Kim, Ki Tae
Lee, Myung Chul
author_facet Lee, Joon Kyu
Lee, Sahnghoon
Chun, Sae Hyung
Kim, Ki Tae
Lee, Myung Chul
author_sort Lee, Joon Kyu
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Femoral component rotation (FCR) is one of the most important factors in total knee arthroplasty. In this prospective study, we used three different techniques for FCR and analyzed their accuracy with postoperative axial computed tomography (CT) images. We also evaluated effect of FCR to clinical outcome. METHODS: One hundred sixty-five patients were randomly allocated into three groups. In the measured resection group, FCR was set by externally rotating the axis 3° off the posterior femoral condylar axis. In the tensor group, a gap-tensioning device set at 20 lbf was used. In the block group, spacer blocks of various thicknesses were used. The FCR angle (FCRa) was measured on postoperative axial CT as an angle between the clinical transepicondylar and posterior condylar axes of the femoral component. Outliers were defined as FCRas deviated more than 3° either internally or externally. Postoperative 2 year clinical scores and knee range of motion were checked. RESULTS: The tensor group had significantly better positioning of the femoral component to the neutral position compared with the measured resection group and the block group (mean FCRa: internal rotation 1.79, 0.43 and 2.63°, respectively, p < 0.001). The outliers were also least frequent in the tensor group (35, 16 and 40%, respectively, p = 0.02). There were no significant differences in postoperative 2 year clinical results among groups. CONCLUSIONS: Gap technique with a 20-lbf tensor device was the most accurate and precise method for obtaining adequate FCR. Measured resection with 3° external rotation and gap technique with blocks could lead to internal rotation of the femoral component. Postoperative 2 year clinical results were not significantly different among groups with different techniques for FCR. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was registered in the Clinical Research information Service (trial number: KCT0000129) in Korea. Registration date is 23(rd) of June, 2011.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5445333
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54453332017-05-30 Rotational alignment of femoral component with different methods in total knee arthroplasty: a randomized, controlled trial Lee, Joon Kyu Lee, Sahnghoon Chun, Sae Hyung Kim, Ki Tae Lee, Myung Chul BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: Femoral component rotation (FCR) is one of the most important factors in total knee arthroplasty. In this prospective study, we used three different techniques for FCR and analyzed their accuracy with postoperative axial computed tomography (CT) images. We also evaluated effect of FCR to clinical outcome. METHODS: One hundred sixty-five patients were randomly allocated into three groups. In the measured resection group, FCR was set by externally rotating the axis 3° off the posterior femoral condylar axis. In the tensor group, a gap-tensioning device set at 20 lbf was used. In the block group, spacer blocks of various thicknesses were used. The FCR angle (FCRa) was measured on postoperative axial CT as an angle between the clinical transepicondylar and posterior condylar axes of the femoral component. Outliers were defined as FCRas deviated more than 3° either internally or externally. Postoperative 2 year clinical scores and knee range of motion were checked. RESULTS: The tensor group had significantly better positioning of the femoral component to the neutral position compared with the measured resection group and the block group (mean FCRa: internal rotation 1.79, 0.43 and 2.63°, respectively, p < 0.001). The outliers were also least frequent in the tensor group (35, 16 and 40%, respectively, p = 0.02). There were no significant differences in postoperative 2 year clinical results among groups. CONCLUSIONS: Gap technique with a 20-lbf tensor device was the most accurate and precise method for obtaining adequate FCR. Measured resection with 3° external rotation and gap technique with blocks could lead to internal rotation of the femoral component. Postoperative 2 year clinical results were not significantly different among groups with different techniques for FCR. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was registered in the Clinical Research information Service (trial number: KCT0000129) in Korea. Registration date is 23(rd) of June, 2011. BioMed Central 2017-05-25 /pmc/articles/PMC5445333/ /pubmed/28545525 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-017-1574-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Lee, Joon Kyu
Lee, Sahnghoon
Chun, Sae Hyung
Kim, Ki Tae
Lee, Myung Chul
Rotational alignment of femoral component with different methods in total knee arthroplasty: a randomized, controlled trial
title Rotational alignment of femoral component with different methods in total knee arthroplasty: a randomized, controlled trial
title_full Rotational alignment of femoral component with different methods in total knee arthroplasty: a randomized, controlled trial
title_fullStr Rotational alignment of femoral component with different methods in total knee arthroplasty: a randomized, controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Rotational alignment of femoral component with different methods in total knee arthroplasty: a randomized, controlled trial
title_short Rotational alignment of femoral component with different methods in total knee arthroplasty: a randomized, controlled trial
title_sort rotational alignment of femoral component with different methods in total knee arthroplasty: a randomized, controlled trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5445333/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28545525
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-017-1574-5
work_keys_str_mv AT leejoonkyu rotationalalignmentoffemoralcomponentwithdifferentmethodsintotalkneearthroplastyarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT leesahnghoon rotationalalignmentoffemoralcomponentwithdifferentmethodsintotalkneearthroplastyarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT chunsaehyung rotationalalignmentoffemoralcomponentwithdifferentmethodsintotalkneearthroplastyarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT kimkitae rotationalalignmentoffemoralcomponentwithdifferentmethodsintotalkneearthroplastyarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT leemyungchul rotationalalignmentoffemoralcomponentwithdifferentmethodsintotalkneearthroplastyarandomizedcontrolledtrial