Cargando…

Comparison of biomarker based Matrix Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization-Time of Flight Mass Spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) and conventional methods in the identification of clinically relevant bacteria and yeast

BACKGROUND: MALDI-TOF MS is an analytical method that has recently become integral in the identification of microorganisms in clinical laboratories. It relies on databases that majorly employ pattern recognition or fingerprinting. Biomarker based databases have also been developed and there is optim...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kassim, Ali, Pflüger, Valentin, Premji, Zul, Daubenberger, Claudia, Revathi, Gunturu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5445374/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28545528
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12866-017-1037-z
_version_ 1783238875469053952
author Kassim, Ali
Pflüger, Valentin
Premji, Zul
Daubenberger, Claudia
Revathi, Gunturu
author_facet Kassim, Ali
Pflüger, Valentin
Premji, Zul
Daubenberger, Claudia
Revathi, Gunturu
author_sort Kassim, Ali
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: MALDI-TOF MS is an analytical method that has recently become integral in the identification of microorganisms in clinical laboratories. It relies on databases that majorly employ pattern recognition or fingerprinting. Biomarker based databases have also been developed and there is optimism that these may be superior to pattern recognition based databases. This study compared the performance of ribosomal biomarker based MALDI-TOF MS and conventional methods in the identification of selected bacteria and yeast. METHODS: The study was a cross sectional study identifying clinically relevant bacteria and yeast isolated from varied clinical specimens submitted to a clinical laboratory. The identification of bacteria using conventional Vitek 2™ automated system, serotyping and MALDI-TOF MS was performed as per standard operating procedures. Comparison of sensitivities were then carried out using Pearson Chi-Square test and p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Secondary outcomes analyzed included the major and minor error rates. RESULTS: Of the 383 isolates MALDI-TOF MS and conventional methods identified 97.6 and 95.7% (p = 0.231) to the genus level and 97.4 and 88.0% (p = 0.000) to the species level respectively. Biomarker based MALDI-TOF MS was significantly superior to Vitek 2™ in the identification of Gram negative bacteria and Gram positive bacteria to the species level. For the Gram positive bacteria, significant difference was observed in the identification of Coagulase negative Staphylococci (p = 0.000) and Enterococcus (p = 0.008). Significant difference was also observed between serotyping and MALDI-TOF MS (p = 0.005) and this was attributed to the lack of identification of Shigella species by MALDI-TOF MS. There was no significant difference observed in the identification of yeast however some species of Candida were unidentified by MALDI-TOF MS. CONCLUSION: Biomarker based MALDI-TOF MS had good performance in a clinical laboratory setting with high sensitivities in the identification of clinically relevant microorganisms.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5445374
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54453742017-05-30 Comparison of biomarker based Matrix Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization-Time of Flight Mass Spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) and conventional methods in the identification of clinically relevant bacteria and yeast Kassim, Ali Pflüger, Valentin Premji, Zul Daubenberger, Claudia Revathi, Gunturu BMC Microbiol Research Article BACKGROUND: MALDI-TOF MS is an analytical method that has recently become integral in the identification of microorganisms in clinical laboratories. It relies on databases that majorly employ pattern recognition or fingerprinting. Biomarker based databases have also been developed and there is optimism that these may be superior to pattern recognition based databases. This study compared the performance of ribosomal biomarker based MALDI-TOF MS and conventional methods in the identification of selected bacteria and yeast. METHODS: The study was a cross sectional study identifying clinically relevant bacteria and yeast isolated from varied clinical specimens submitted to a clinical laboratory. The identification of bacteria using conventional Vitek 2™ automated system, serotyping and MALDI-TOF MS was performed as per standard operating procedures. Comparison of sensitivities were then carried out using Pearson Chi-Square test and p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Secondary outcomes analyzed included the major and minor error rates. RESULTS: Of the 383 isolates MALDI-TOF MS and conventional methods identified 97.6 and 95.7% (p = 0.231) to the genus level and 97.4 and 88.0% (p = 0.000) to the species level respectively. Biomarker based MALDI-TOF MS was significantly superior to Vitek 2™ in the identification of Gram negative bacteria and Gram positive bacteria to the species level. For the Gram positive bacteria, significant difference was observed in the identification of Coagulase negative Staphylococci (p = 0.000) and Enterococcus (p = 0.008). Significant difference was also observed between serotyping and MALDI-TOF MS (p = 0.005) and this was attributed to the lack of identification of Shigella species by MALDI-TOF MS. There was no significant difference observed in the identification of yeast however some species of Candida were unidentified by MALDI-TOF MS. CONCLUSION: Biomarker based MALDI-TOF MS had good performance in a clinical laboratory setting with high sensitivities in the identification of clinically relevant microorganisms. BioMed Central 2017-05-25 /pmc/articles/PMC5445374/ /pubmed/28545528 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12866-017-1037-z Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kassim, Ali
Pflüger, Valentin
Premji, Zul
Daubenberger, Claudia
Revathi, Gunturu
Comparison of biomarker based Matrix Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization-Time of Flight Mass Spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) and conventional methods in the identification of clinically relevant bacteria and yeast
title Comparison of biomarker based Matrix Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization-Time of Flight Mass Spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) and conventional methods in the identification of clinically relevant bacteria and yeast
title_full Comparison of biomarker based Matrix Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization-Time of Flight Mass Spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) and conventional methods in the identification of clinically relevant bacteria and yeast
title_fullStr Comparison of biomarker based Matrix Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization-Time of Flight Mass Spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) and conventional methods in the identification of clinically relevant bacteria and yeast
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of biomarker based Matrix Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization-Time of Flight Mass Spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) and conventional methods in the identification of clinically relevant bacteria and yeast
title_short Comparison of biomarker based Matrix Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization-Time of Flight Mass Spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) and conventional methods in the identification of clinically relevant bacteria and yeast
title_sort comparison of biomarker based matrix assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry (maldi-tof ms) and conventional methods in the identification of clinically relevant bacteria and yeast
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5445374/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28545528
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12866-017-1037-z
work_keys_str_mv AT kassimali comparisonofbiomarkerbasedmatrixassistedlaserdesorptionionizationtimeofflightmassspectrometrymalditofmsandconventionalmethodsintheidentificationofclinicallyrelevantbacteriaandyeast
AT pflugervalentin comparisonofbiomarkerbasedmatrixassistedlaserdesorptionionizationtimeofflightmassspectrometrymalditofmsandconventionalmethodsintheidentificationofclinicallyrelevantbacteriaandyeast
AT premjizul comparisonofbiomarkerbasedmatrixassistedlaserdesorptionionizationtimeofflightmassspectrometrymalditofmsandconventionalmethodsintheidentificationofclinicallyrelevantbacteriaandyeast
AT daubenbergerclaudia comparisonofbiomarkerbasedmatrixassistedlaserdesorptionionizationtimeofflightmassspectrometrymalditofmsandconventionalmethodsintheidentificationofclinicallyrelevantbacteriaandyeast
AT revathigunturu comparisonofbiomarkerbasedmatrixassistedlaserdesorptionionizationtimeofflightmassspectrometrymalditofmsandconventionalmethodsintheidentificationofclinicallyrelevantbacteriaandyeast