Cargando…

Assessment of Saxagliptin Efficacy: Meta-Analysis of 14 Phase 2 and 3 Clinical Trials

INTRODUCTION: This meta-analysis of data from 14 phase 2 and 3, double-blind, randomized, controlled 12- and 24-week studies (N = 4632) summarizes saxagliptin efficacy in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) across treatment regimens. METHODS: Patients received saxagliptin 5 mg/d or control as either...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sjöstrand, Mikaela, Wei, Cheryl, Cook, William, Johnsson, Kristina, Pollack, Pia S., Stahre, Christina, Hirshberg, Boaz
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Healthcare 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5446386/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28432619
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13300-017-0261-8
_version_ 1783239058178179072
author Sjöstrand, Mikaela
Wei, Cheryl
Cook, William
Johnsson, Kristina
Pollack, Pia S.
Stahre, Christina
Hirshberg, Boaz
author_facet Sjöstrand, Mikaela
Wei, Cheryl
Cook, William
Johnsson, Kristina
Pollack, Pia S.
Stahre, Christina
Hirshberg, Boaz
author_sort Sjöstrand, Mikaela
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: This meta-analysis of data from 14 phase 2 and 3, double-blind, randomized, controlled 12- and 24-week studies (N = 4632) summarizes saxagliptin efficacy in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) across treatment regimens. METHODS: Patients received saxagliptin 5 mg/d or control as either monotherapy (n = 1196 vs placebo), add-on therapy (n = 2139 vs placebo and n = 514 vs uptitrated sulfonylurea), or initial combination therapy (n = 619 vs control monotherapy). Patients with renal impairment received saxagliptin 2.5 mg/d or placebo (n = 164). RESULTS: Mean baseline glycated hemoglobin (A1C) ranged from 8.07% to 9.43% for the saxagliptin and control groups across treatment regimens. A1C reduction from baseline was greater with saxagliptin versus control for all studies combined (mean treatment difference [95% CI]: –0.55% [–0.63%, –0.47%]) and when used as monotherapy (–0.52% [–0.63, –0.40%]), add-on (–0.55% [–0.69%, –0.40%] vs placebo; –0.72% [–0.88%, –0.56%] vs uptitrated sulfonylurea), initial combination therapy (–0.54% [–0.73%, –0.35%] vs control monotherapy), and in patients with renal impairment (–0.42% [–0.75%, –0.09%]). Similar reductions in A1C versus control were noted for patients <65 years (–0.55% [–0.67%, –0.43%]) and ≥65 years (–0.54% [–0.69%, –0.38%]) and for men (–0.54% [–0.69%, –0.40%]) and women (–0.55% [–0.64%, –0.47%]) across treatment regimens. More patients achieved A1C <7% (39% vs 23%) and A1C ≤6.5% (24% vs 14%) with saxagliptin than with placebo or active-control treatment. Saxagliptin versus control was associated with a reduction in glucagon area under the curve (AUC) from baseline and increases in insulin AUC, C-peptide AUC, and the homeostasis model assessment of β-cell function. CONCLUSION: Results of this meta-analysis demonstrate the consistency of saxagliptin efficacy in different subgroups of patients with T2D across treatment regimens. FUNDING: AstraZeneca. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s13300-017-0261-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5446386
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Springer Healthcare
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54463862017-06-12 Assessment of Saxagliptin Efficacy: Meta-Analysis of 14 Phase 2 and 3 Clinical Trials Sjöstrand, Mikaela Wei, Cheryl Cook, William Johnsson, Kristina Pollack, Pia S. Stahre, Christina Hirshberg, Boaz Diabetes Ther Original Research INTRODUCTION: This meta-analysis of data from 14 phase 2 and 3, double-blind, randomized, controlled 12- and 24-week studies (N = 4632) summarizes saxagliptin efficacy in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) across treatment regimens. METHODS: Patients received saxagliptin 5 mg/d or control as either monotherapy (n = 1196 vs placebo), add-on therapy (n = 2139 vs placebo and n = 514 vs uptitrated sulfonylurea), or initial combination therapy (n = 619 vs control monotherapy). Patients with renal impairment received saxagliptin 2.5 mg/d or placebo (n = 164). RESULTS: Mean baseline glycated hemoglobin (A1C) ranged from 8.07% to 9.43% for the saxagliptin and control groups across treatment regimens. A1C reduction from baseline was greater with saxagliptin versus control for all studies combined (mean treatment difference [95% CI]: –0.55% [–0.63%, –0.47%]) and when used as monotherapy (–0.52% [–0.63, –0.40%]), add-on (–0.55% [–0.69%, –0.40%] vs placebo; –0.72% [–0.88%, –0.56%] vs uptitrated sulfonylurea), initial combination therapy (–0.54% [–0.73%, –0.35%] vs control monotherapy), and in patients with renal impairment (–0.42% [–0.75%, –0.09%]). Similar reductions in A1C versus control were noted for patients <65 years (–0.55% [–0.67%, –0.43%]) and ≥65 years (–0.54% [–0.69%, –0.38%]) and for men (–0.54% [–0.69%, –0.40%]) and women (–0.55% [–0.64%, –0.47%]) across treatment regimens. More patients achieved A1C <7% (39% vs 23%) and A1C ≤6.5% (24% vs 14%) with saxagliptin than with placebo or active-control treatment. Saxagliptin versus control was associated with a reduction in glucagon area under the curve (AUC) from baseline and increases in insulin AUC, C-peptide AUC, and the homeostasis model assessment of β-cell function. CONCLUSION: Results of this meta-analysis demonstrate the consistency of saxagliptin efficacy in different subgroups of patients with T2D across treatment regimens. FUNDING: AstraZeneca. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s13300-017-0261-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Healthcare 2017-04-21 2017-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5446386/ /pubmed/28432619 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13300-017-0261-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Research
Sjöstrand, Mikaela
Wei, Cheryl
Cook, William
Johnsson, Kristina
Pollack, Pia S.
Stahre, Christina
Hirshberg, Boaz
Assessment of Saxagliptin Efficacy: Meta-Analysis of 14 Phase 2 and 3 Clinical Trials
title Assessment of Saxagliptin Efficacy: Meta-Analysis of 14 Phase 2 and 3 Clinical Trials
title_full Assessment of Saxagliptin Efficacy: Meta-Analysis of 14 Phase 2 and 3 Clinical Trials
title_fullStr Assessment of Saxagliptin Efficacy: Meta-Analysis of 14 Phase 2 and 3 Clinical Trials
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of Saxagliptin Efficacy: Meta-Analysis of 14 Phase 2 and 3 Clinical Trials
title_short Assessment of Saxagliptin Efficacy: Meta-Analysis of 14 Phase 2 and 3 Clinical Trials
title_sort assessment of saxagliptin efficacy: meta-analysis of 14 phase 2 and 3 clinical trials
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5446386/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28432619
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13300-017-0261-8
work_keys_str_mv AT sjostrandmikaela assessmentofsaxagliptinefficacymetaanalysisof14phase2and3clinicaltrials
AT weicheryl assessmentofsaxagliptinefficacymetaanalysisof14phase2and3clinicaltrials
AT cookwilliam assessmentofsaxagliptinefficacymetaanalysisof14phase2and3clinicaltrials
AT johnssonkristina assessmentofsaxagliptinefficacymetaanalysisof14phase2and3clinicaltrials
AT pollackpias assessmentofsaxagliptinefficacymetaanalysisof14phase2and3clinicaltrials
AT stahrechristina assessmentofsaxagliptinefficacymetaanalysisof14phase2and3clinicaltrials
AT hirshbergboaz assessmentofsaxagliptinefficacymetaanalysisof14phase2and3clinicaltrials