Cargando…
Assessment of Saxagliptin Efficacy: Meta-Analysis of 14 Phase 2 and 3 Clinical Trials
INTRODUCTION: This meta-analysis of data from 14 phase 2 and 3, double-blind, randomized, controlled 12- and 24-week studies (N = 4632) summarizes saxagliptin efficacy in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) across treatment regimens. METHODS: Patients received saxagliptin 5 mg/d or control as either...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Healthcare
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5446386/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28432619 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13300-017-0261-8 |
_version_ | 1783239058178179072 |
---|---|
author | Sjöstrand, Mikaela Wei, Cheryl Cook, William Johnsson, Kristina Pollack, Pia S. Stahre, Christina Hirshberg, Boaz |
author_facet | Sjöstrand, Mikaela Wei, Cheryl Cook, William Johnsson, Kristina Pollack, Pia S. Stahre, Christina Hirshberg, Boaz |
author_sort | Sjöstrand, Mikaela |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: This meta-analysis of data from 14 phase 2 and 3, double-blind, randomized, controlled 12- and 24-week studies (N = 4632) summarizes saxagliptin efficacy in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) across treatment regimens. METHODS: Patients received saxagliptin 5 mg/d or control as either monotherapy (n = 1196 vs placebo), add-on therapy (n = 2139 vs placebo and n = 514 vs uptitrated sulfonylurea), or initial combination therapy (n = 619 vs control monotherapy). Patients with renal impairment received saxagliptin 2.5 mg/d or placebo (n = 164). RESULTS: Mean baseline glycated hemoglobin (A1C) ranged from 8.07% to 9.43% for the saxagliptin and control groups across treatment regimens. A1C reduction from baseline was greater with saxagliptin versus control for all studies combined (mean treatment difference [95% CI]: –0.55% [–0.63%, –0.47%]) and when used as monotherapy (–0.52% [–0.63, –0.40%]), add-on (–0.55% [–0.69%, –0.40%] vs placebo; –0.72% [–0.88%, –0.56%] vs uptitrated sulfonylurea), initial combination therapy (–0.54% [–0.73%, –0.35%] vs control monotherapy), and in patients with renal impairment (–0.42% [–0.75%, –0.09%]). Similar reductions in A1C versus control were noted for patients <65 years (–0.55% [–0.67%, –0.43%]) and ≥65 years (–0.54% [–0.69%, –0.38%]) and for men (–0.54% [–0.69%, –0.40%]) and women (–0.55% [–0.64%, –0.47%]) across treatment regimens. More patients achieved A1C <7% (39% vs 23%) and A1C ≤6.5% (24% vs 14%) with saxagliptin than with placebo or active-control treatment. Saxagliptin versus control was associated with a reduction in glucagon area under the curve (AUC) from baseline and increases in insulin AUC, C-peptide AUC, and the homeostasis model assessment of β-cell function. CONCLUSION: Results of this meta-analysis demonstrate the consistency of saxagliptin efficacy in different subgroups of patients with T2D across treatment regimens. FUNDING: AstraZeneca. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s13300-017-0261-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5446386 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Springer Healthcare |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54463862017-06-12 Assessment of Saxagliptin Efficacy: Meta-Analysis of 14 Phase 2 and 3 Clinical Trials Sjöstrand, Mikaela Wei, Cheryl Cook, William Johnsson, Kristina Pollack, Pia S. Stahre, Christina Hirshberg, Boaz Diabetes Ther Original Research INTRODUCTION: This meta-analysis of data from 14 phase 2 and 3, double-blind, randomized, controlled 12- and 24-week studies (N = 4632) summarizes saxagliptin efficacy in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) across treatment regimens. METHODS: Patients received saxagliptin 5 mg/d or control as either monotherapy (n = 1196 vs placebo), add-on therapy (n = 2139 vs placebo and n = 514 vs uptitrated sulfonylurea), or initial combination therapy (n = 619 vs control monotherapy). Patients with renal impairment received saxagliptin 2.5 mg/d or placebo (n = 164). RESULTS: Mean baseline glycated hemoglobin (A1C) ranged from 8.07% to 9.43% for the saxagliptin and control groups across treatment regimens. A1C reduction from baseline was greater with saxagliptin versus control for all studies combined (mean treatment difference [95% CI]: –0.55% [–0.63%, –0.47%]) and when used as monotherapy (–0.52% [–0.63, –0.40%]), add-on (–0.55% [–0.69%, –0.40%] vs placebo; –0.72% [–0.88%, –0.56%] vs uptitrated sulfonylurea), initial combination therapy (–0.54% [–0.73%, –0.35%] vs control monotherapy), and in patients with renal impairment (–0.42% [–0.75%, –0.09%]). Similar reductions in A1C versus control were noted for patients <65 years (–0.55% [–0.67%, –0.43%]) and ≥65 years (–0.54% [–0.69%, –0.38%]) and for men (–0.54% [–0.69%, –0.40%]) and women (–0.55% [–0.64%, –0.47%]) across treatment regimens. More patients achieved A1C <7% (39% vs 23%) and A1C ≤6.5% (24% vs 14%) with saxagliptin than with placebo or active-control treatment. Saxagliptin versus control was associated with a reduction in glucagon area under the curve (AUC) from baseline and increases in insulin AUC, C-peptide AUC, and the homeostasis model assessment of β-cell function. CONCLUSION: Results of this meta-analysis demonstrate the consistency of saxagliptin efficacy in different subgroups of patients with T2D across treatment regimens. FUNDING: AstraZeneca. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s13300-017-0261-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Healthcare 2017-04-21 2017-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5446386/ /pubmed/28432619 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13300-017-0261-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Sjöstrand, Mikaela Wei, Cheryl Cook, William Johnsson, Kristina Pollack, Pia S. Stahre, Christina Hirshberg, Boaz Assessment of Saxagliptin Efficacy: Meta-Analysis of 14 Phase 2 and 3 Clinical Trials |
title | Assessment of Saxagliptin Efficacy: Meta-Analysis of 14 Phase 2 and 3 Clinical Trials |
title_full | Assessment of Saxagliptin Efficacy: Meta-Analysis of 14 Phase 2 and 3 Clinical Trials |
title_fullStr | Assessment of Saxagliptin Efficacy: Meta-Analysis of 14 Phase 2 and 3 Clinical Trials |
title_full_unstemmed | Assessment of Saxagliptin Efficacy: Meta-Analysis of 14 Phase 2 and 3 Clinical Trials |
title_short | Assessment of Saxagliptin Efficacy: Meta-Analysis of 14 Phase 2 and 3 Clinical Trials |
title_sort | assessment of saxagliptin efficacy: meta-analysis of 14 phase 2 and 3 clinical trials |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5446386/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28432619 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13300-017-0261-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sjostrandmikaela assessmentofsaxagliptinefficacymetaanalysisof14phase2and3clinicaltrials AT weicheryl assessmentofsaxagliptinefficacymetaanalysisof14phase2and3clinicaltrials AT cookwilliam assessmentofsaxagliptinefficacymetaanalysisof14phase2and3clinicaltrials AT johnssonkristina assessmentofsaxagliptinefficacymetaanalysisof14phase2and3clinicaltrials AT pollackpias assessmentofsaxagliptinefficacymetaanalysisof14phase2and3clinicaltrials AT stahrechristina assessmentofsaxagliptinefficacymetaanalysisof14phase2and3clinicaltrials AT hirshbergboaz assessmentofsaxagliptinefficacymetaanalysisof14phase2and3clinicaltrials |