Cargando…

Differences in selectivity to natural images in early visual areas (V1–V3)

High-level regions of the ventral visual pathway respond more to intact objects compared to scrambled objects. The aim of this study was to determine if this selectivity for objects emerges at an earlier stage of processing. Visual areas (V1–V3) were defined for each participant using retinotopic ma...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Coggan, David D., Allen, Luke A., Farrar, Oliver R. H., Gouws, Andre D., Morland, Antony B., Baker, Daniel H., Andrews, Timothy J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5446401/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28550282
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-02569-4
_version_ 1783239062876848128
author Coggan, David D.
Allen, Luke A.
Farrar, Oliver R. H.
Gouws, Andre D.
Morland, Antony B.
Baker, Daniel H.
Andrews, Timothy J.
author_facet Coggan, David D.
Allen, Luke A.
Farrar, Oliver R. H.
Gouws, Andre D.
Morland, Antony B.
Baker, Daniel H.
Andrews, Timothy J.
author_sort Coggan, David D.
collection PubMed
description High-level regions of the ventral visual pathway respond more to intact objects compared to scrambled objects. The aim of this study was to determine if this selectivity for objects emerges at an earlier stage of processing. Visual areas (V1–V3) were defined for each participant using retinotopic mapping. Participants then viewed intact and scrambled images from different object categories (bottle, chair, face, house, shoe) while neural responses were measured using fMRI. Our rationale for using scrambled images is that they contain the same low-level properties as the intact objects, but lack the higher-order combinations of features that are characteristic of natural images. Neural responses were higher for scrambled than intact images in all regions. However, the difference between intact and scrambled images was smaller in V3 compared to V1 and V2. Next, we measured the spatial patterns of response to intact and scrambled images from different object categories. We found higher within-category compared to between category correlations for both intact and scrambled images demonstrating distinct patterns of response. Spatial patterns of response were more distinct for intact compared to scrambled images in V3, but not in V1 or V2. These findings demonstrate the emergence of selectivity to natural images in V3.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5446401
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54464012017-05-30 Differences in selectivity to natural images in early visual areas (V1–V3) Coggan, David D. Allen, Luke A. Farrar, Oliver R. H. Gouws, Andre D. Morland, Antony B. Baker, Daniel H. Andrews, Timothy J. Sci Rep Article High-level regions of the ventral visual pathway respond more to intact objects compared to scrambled objects. The aim of this study was to determine if this selectivity for objects emerges at an earlier stage of processing. Visual areas (V1–V3) were defined for each participant using retinotopic mapping. Participants then viewed intact and scrambled images from different object categories (bottle, chair, face, house, shoe) while neural responses were measured using fMRI. Our rationale for using scrambled images is that they contain the same low-level properties as the intact objects, but lack the higher-order combinations of features that are characteristic of natural images. Neural responses were higher for scrambled than intact images in all regions. However, the difference between intact and scrambled images was smaller in V3 compared to V1 and V2. Next, we measured the spatial patterns of response to intact and scrambled images from different object categories. We found higher within-category compared to between category correlations for both intact and scrambled images demonstrating distinct patterns of response. Spatial patterns of response were more distinct for intact compared to scrambled images in V3, but not in V1 or V2. These findings demonstrate the emergence of selectivity to natural images in V3. Nature Publishing Group UK 2017-05-26 /pmc/articles/PMC5446401/ /pubmed/28550282 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-02569-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Coggan, David D.
Allen, Luke A.
Farrar, Oliver R. H.
Gouws, Andre D.
Morland, Antony B.
Baker, Daniel H.
Andrews, Timothy J.
Differences in selectivity to natural images in early visual areas (V1–V3)
title Differences in selectivity to natural images in early visual areas (V1–V3)
title_full Differences in selectivity to natural images in early visual areas (V1–V3)
title_fullStr Differences in selectivity to natural images in early visual areas (V1–V3)
title_full_unstemmed Differences in selectivity to natural images in early visual areas (V1–V3)
title_short Differences in selectivity to natural images in early visual areas (V1–V3)
title_sort differences in selectivity to natural images in early visual areas (v1–v3)
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5446401/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28550282
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-02569-4
work_keys_str_mv AT coggandavidd differencesinselectivitytonaturalimagesinearlyvisualareasv1v3
AT allenlukea differencesinselectivitytonaturalimagesinearlyvisualareasv1v3
AT farraroliverrh differencesinselectivitytonaturalimagesinearlyvisualareasv1v3
AT gouwsandred differencesinselectivitytonaturalimagesinearlyvisualareasv1v3
AT morlandantonyb differencesinselectivitytonaturalimagesinearlyvisualareasv1v3
AT bakerdanielh differencesinselectivitytonaturalimagesinearlyvisualareasv1v3
AT andrewstimothyj differencesinselectivitytonaturalimagesinearlyvisualareasv1v3