Cargando…
Thoracic Surgery Information on the Internet: A Multilingual Quality Assessment
BACKGROUND: Previous data suggest that quality of Internet information regarding surgical conditions and their treatments is variable. However, no comprehensive analysis of website quality exists for thoracic surgery. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to quantify website quality in a multilingual...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
JMIR Publications
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5446665/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28500021 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/ijmr.6732 |
_version_ | 1783239129049333760 |
---|---|
author | Davaris, Myles Barnett, Stephen Abouassaly, Robert Lawrentschuk, Nathan |
author_facet | Davaris, Myles Barnett, Stephen Abouassaly, Robert Lawrentschuk, Nathan |
author_sort | Davaris, Myles |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Previous data suggest that quality of Internet information regarding surgical conditions and their treatments is variable. However, no comprehensive analysis of website quality exists for thoracic surgery. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to quantify website quality in a multilingual setting using an international standard for assessment. METHODS: Health On the Net (HON) principles may be applied to websites using an automated toolbar function. We used the English, French, Spanish, and German Google search engines to identify 12,000 websites using keywords related to thoracic conditions and procedures. The first 150 websites returned by each keyword in each language were examined. We compared website quality to assess for tertile (is the quality better in first, second, or third 50 websites returned) and language differences. A further analysis of the English site types was undertaken performing a comparative analysis of website provider types. RESULTS: Overall, there are a considerable number of websites devoted to thoracic surgery: “lung cancer” returned over 150 million websites. About 7.85% (940/11,967) of websites are HON-accredited with differences by search term (P<.001) and tertiles (P<.001) of the first 150 websites, but not between languages. Oncological keywords regarding conditions and procedures were found to return a higher percentage of HON-accreditation. The percentage of HON-accredited sites was similar across all four languages (P=.77). In general, the first tertile contained a higher percentage of HON-accredited sites for every keyword. CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians should appreciate the lack of validation of the majority of thoracic websites, with discrepancies in quality and number of websites across conditions and procedures. These differences appear similar regardless of language. An opportunity exists for clinicians to participate in the development of informative, ethical, and reliable health websites on the Internet and direct patients to them. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5446665 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | JMIR Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54466652017-06-06 Thoracic Surgery Information on the Internet: A Multilingual Quality Assessment Davaris, Myles Barnett, Stephen Abouassaly, Robert Lawrentschuk, Nathan Interact J Med Res Original Paper BACKGROUND: Previous data suggest that quality of Internet information regarding surgical conditions and their treatments is variable. However, no comprehensive analysis of website quality exists for thoracic surgery. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to quantify website quality in a multilingual setting using an international standard for assessment. METHODS: Health On the Net (HON) principles may be applied to websites using an automated toolbar function. We used the English, French, Spanish, and German Google search engines to identify 12,000 websites using keywords related to thoracic conditions and procedures. The first 150 websites returned by each keyword in each language were examined. We compared website quality to assess for tertile (is the quality better in first, second, or third 50 websites returned) and language differences. A further analysis of the English site types was undertaken performing a comparative analysis of website provider types. RESULTS: Overall, there are a considerable number of websites devoted to thoracic surgery: “lung cancer” returned over 150 million websites. About 7.85% (940/11,967) of websites are HON-accredited with differences by search term (P<.001) and tertiles (P<.001) of the first 150 websites, but not between languages. Oncological keywords regarding conditions and procedures were found to return a higher percentage of HON-accreditation. The percentage of HON-accredited sites was similar across all four languages (P=.77). In general, the first tertile contained a higher percentage of HON-accredited sites for every keyword. CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians should appreciate the lack of validation of the majority of thoracic websites, with discrepancies in quality and number of websites across conditions and procedures. These differences appear similar regardless of language. An opportunity exists for clinicians to participate in the development of informative, ethical, and reliable health websites on the Internet and direct patients to them. JMIR Publications 2017-05-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5446665/ /pubmed/28500021 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/ijmr.6732 Text en ©Myles Davaris, Stephen Barnett, Robert Abouassaly, Nathan Lawrentschuk. Originally published in the Interactive Journal of Medical Research (http://www.i-jmr.org/), 12.05.2017. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Interactive Journal of Medical Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://www.i-jmr.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Davaris, Myles Barnett, Stephen Abouassaly, Robert Lawrentschuk, Nathan Thoracic Surgery Information on the Internet: A Multilingual Quality Assessment |
title | Thoracic Surgery Information on the Internet: A Multilingual Quality Assessment |
title_full | Thoracic Surgery Information on the Internet: A Multilingual Quality Assessment |
title_fullStr | Thoracic Surgery Information on the Internet: A Multilingual Quality Assessment |
title_full_unstemmed | Thoracic Surgery Information on the Internet: A Multilingual Quality Assessment |
title_short | Thoracic Surgery Information on the Internet: A Multilingual Quality Assessment |
title_sort | thoracic surgery information on the internet: a multilingual quality assessment |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5446665/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28500021 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/ijmr.6732 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT davarismyles thoracicsurgeryinformationontheinternetamultilingualqualityassessment AT barnettstephen thoracicsurgeryinformationontheinternetamultilingualqualityassessment AT abouassalyrobert thoracicsurgeryinformationontheinternetamultilingualqualityassessment AT lawrentschuknathan thoracicsurgeryinformationontheinternetamultilingualqualityassessment |