Cargando…

Thoracic Surgery Information on the Internet: A Multilingual Quality Assessment

BACKGROUND: Previous data suggest that quality of Internet information regarding surgical conditions and their treatments is variable. However, no comprehensive analysis of website quality exists for thoracic surgery. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to quantify website quality in a multilingual...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Davaris, Myles, Barnett, Stephen, Abouassaly, Robert, Lawrentschuk, Nathan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5446665/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28500021
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/ijmr.6732
_version_ 1783239129049333760
author Davaris, Myles
Barnett, Stephen
Abouassaly, Robert
Lawrentschuk, Nathan
author_facet Davaris, Myles
Barnett, Stephen
Abouassaly, Robert
Lawrentschuk, Nathan
author_sort Davaris, Myles
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Previous data suggest that quality of Internet information regarding surgical conditions and their treatments is variable. However, no comprehensive analysis of website quality exists for thoracic surgery. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to quantify website quality in a multilingual setting using an international standard for assessment. METHODS: Health On the Net (HON) principles may be applied to websites using an automated toolbar function. We used the English, French, Spanish, and German Google search engines to identify 12,000 websites using keywords related to thoracic conditions and procedures. The first 150 websites returned by each keyword in each language were examined. We compared website quality to assess for tertile (is the quality better in first, second, or third 50 websites returned) and language differences. A further analysis of the English site types was undertaken performing a comparative analysis of website provider types. RESULTS: Overall, there are a considerable number of websites devoted to thoracic surgery: “lung cancer” returned over 150 million websites. About 7.85% (940/11,967) of websites are HON-accredited with differences by search term (P<.001) and tertiles (P<.001) of the first 150 websites, but not between languages. Oncological keywords regarding conditions and procedures were found to return a higher percentage of HON-accreditation. The percentage of HON-accredited sites was similar across all four languages (P=.77). In general, the first tertile contained a higher percentage of HON-accredited sites for every keyword. CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians should appreciate the lack of validation of the majority of thoracic websites, with discrepancies in quality and number of websites across conditions and procedures. These differences appear similar regardless of language. An opportunity exists for clinicians to participate in the development of informative, ethical, and reliable health websites on the Internet and direct patients to them.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5446665
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54466652017-06-06 Thoracic Surgery Information on the Internet: A Multilingual Quality Assessment Davaris, Myles Barnett, Stephen Abouassaly, Robert Lawrentschuk, Nathan Interact J Med Res Original Paper BACKGROUND: Previous data suggest that quality of Internet information regarding surgical conditions and their treatments is variable. However, no comprehensive analysis of website quality exists for thoracic surgery. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to quantify website quality in a multilingual setting using an international standard for assessment. METHODS: Health On the Net (HON) principles may be applied to websites using an automated toolbar function. We used the English, French, Spanish, and German Google search engines to identify 12,000 websites using keywords related to thoracic conditions and procedures. The first 150 websites returned by each keyword in each language were examined. We compared website quality to assess for tertile (is the quality better in first, second, or third 50 websites returned) and language differences. A further analysis of the English site types was undertaken performing a comparative analysis of website provider types. RESULTS: Overall, there are a considerable number of websites devoted to thoracic surgery: “lung cancer” returned over 150 million websites. About 7.85% (940/11,967) of websites are HON-accredited with differences by search term (P<.001) and tertiles (P<.001) of the first 150 websites, but not between languages. Oncological keywords regarding conditions and procedures were found to return a higher percentage of HON-accreditation. The percentage of HON-accredited sites was similar across all four languages (P=.77). In general, the first tertile contained a higher percentage of HON-accredited sites for every keyword. CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians should appreciate the lack of validation of the majority of thoracic websites, with discrepancies in quality and number of websites across conditions and procedures. These differences appear similar regardless of language. An opportunity exists for clinicians to participate in the development of informative, ethical, and reliable health websites on the Internet and direct patients to them. JMIR Publications 2017-05-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5446665/ /pubmed/28500021 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/ijmr.6732 Text en ©Myles Davaris, Stephen Barnett, Robert Abouassaly, Nathan Lawrentschuk. Originally published in the Interactive Journal of Medical Research (http://www.i-jmr.org/), 12.05.2017. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Interactive Journal of Medical Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://www.i-jmr.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Davaris, Myles
Barnett, Stephen
Abouassaly, Robert
Lawrentschuk, Nathan
Thoracic Surgery Information on the Internet: A Multilingual Quality Assessment
title Thoracic Surgery Information on the Internet: A Multilingual Quality Assessment
title_full Thoracic Surgery Information on the Internet: A Multilingual Quality Assessment
title_fullStr Thoracic Surgery Information on the Internet: A Multilingual Quality Assessment
title_full_unstemmed Thoracic Surgery Information on the Internet: A Multilingual Quality Assessment
title_short Thoracic Surgery Information on the Internet: A Multilingual Quality Assessment
title_sort thoracic surgery information on the internet: a multilingual quality assessment
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5446665/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28500021
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/ijmr.6732
work_keys_str_mv AT davarismyles thoracicsurgeryinformationontheinternetamultilingualqualityassessment
AT barnettstephen thoracicsurgeryinformationontheinternetamultilingualqualityassessment
AT abouassalyrobert thoracicsurgeryinformationontheinternetamultilingualqualityassessment
AT lawrentschuknathan thoracicsurgeryinformationontheinternetamultilingualqualityassessment