Cargando…

Engaging the Canadian public on reimbursement decision-making for drugs for rare diseases: a national online survey

BACKGROUND: Funding of drugs for rare diseases (DRDs) requires decisions that balance fairness for all individuals within the healthcare system with compassion for affected individuals. Our study objective was to conduct a national online survey to determine the Canadian public’s perspective, includ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Polisena, Julie, Burgess, Michael, Mitton, Craig, Lynd, Larry D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5446683/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28549479
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017-2310-4
_version_ 1783239133771071488
author Polisena, Julie
Burgess, Michael
Mitton, Craig
Lynd, Larry D.
author_facet Polisena, Julie
Burgess, Michael
Mitton, Craig
Lynd, Larry D.
author_sort Polisena, Julie
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Funding of drugs for rare diseases (DRDs) requires decisions that balance fairness for all individuals within the healthcare system with compassion for affected individuals. Our study objective was to conduct a national online survey to determine the Canadian public’s perspective, including regional variations, associated with DRD decision-making. METHODS: The survey collected responses from 1631 Canadians. Respondents were asked to rank at least three and up to five DRD decision-making priorities, out of a total of eight priorities presented. They were also asked to compare and rate their agreement level on a 5-point Likert scale with four funding scenarios described. The frequency of each priority, independent of where it was ranked in relation to the other priorities, was calculated. Regression analyses were conducted to measure the association between respondents’ demographics and selected priorities with their agreement level for each funding scenario. RESULTS: Among the survey respondents, Improved Quality of Life and Effective Health Care were most frequently selected as top priorities. Also, 79.2% of respondents agreed with equal access to DRDs across Canada, and 73.0% agreed with DRD funding if additional expenses are justified in the DRD’s cost-effectiveness. Approximately half agreed to pay for DRDs independent of their effectiveness. There were no geographic differences in priorities. Selecting Effective Health Care in the top priorities was positively associated with both prioritizing other programs over programs for rare diseases and DRD funding only if deemed as cost-effective. Respondents, who selected National Access as one of the top priorities, were less likely to agree to fund DRDs only if deemed as cost-effective and were more likely to agree with the scenario to provide national access to DRDs. CONCLUSIONS: The survey results suggest the level of public support for funding decisions and programs that incorporate assessment of the effectiveness of drugs for improving quality of life, and to promote similar access across Canada. The responses anticipate public responses to different policy scenarios and the priorities that underlie them. Decision-makers may find it useful to consider whether and how to incorporate these results into policy decisions and their justification to citizens and patients. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12913-017-2310-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5446683
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54466832017-05-30 Engaging the Canadian public on reimbursement decision-making for drugs for rare diseases: a national online survey Polisena, Julie Burgess, Michael Mitton, Craig Lynd, Larry D. BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Funding of drugs for rare diseases (DRDs) requires decisions that balance fairness for all individuals within the healthcare system with compassion for affected individuals. Our study objective was to conduct a national online survey to determine the Canadian public’s perspective, including regional variations, associated with DRD decision-making. METHODS: The survey collected responses from 1631 Canadians. Respondents were asked to rank at least three and up to five DRD decision-making priorities, out of a total of eight priorities presented. They were also asked to compare and rate their agreement level on a 5-point Likert scale with four funding scenarios described. The frequency of each priority, independent of where it was ranked in relation to the other priorities, was calculated. Regression analyses were conducted to measure the association between respondents’ demographics and selected priorities with their agreement level for each funding scenario. RESULTS: Among the survey respondents, Improved Quality of Life and Effective Health Care were most frequently selected as top priorities. Also, 79.2% of respondents agreed with equal access to DRDs across Canada, and 73.0% agreed with DRD funding if additional expenses are justified in the DRD’s cost-effectiveness. Approximately half agreed to pay for DRDs independent of their effectiveness. There were no geographic differences in priorities. Selecting Effective Health Care in the top priorities was positively associated with both prioritizing other programs over programs for rare diseases and DRD funding only if deemed as cost-effective. Respondents, who selected National Access as one of the top priorities, were less likely to agree to fund DRDs only if deemed as cost-effective and were more likely to agree with the scenario to provide national access to DRDs. CONCLUSIONS: The survey results suggest the level of public support for funding decisions and programs that incorporate assessment of the effectiveness of drugs for improving quality of life, and to promote similar access across Canada. The responses anticipate public responses to different policy scenarios and the priorities that underlie them. Decision-makers may find it useful to consider whether and how to incorporate these results into policy decisions and their justification to citizens and patients. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12913-017-2310-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-05-26 /pmc/articles/PMC5446683/ /pubmed/28549479 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017-2310-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Polisena, Julie
Burgess, Michael
Mitton, Craig
Lynd, Larry D.
Engaging the Canadian public on reimbursement decision-making for drugs for rare diseases: a national online survey
title Engaging the Canadian public on reimbursement decision-making for drugs for rare diseases: a national online survey
title_full Engaging the Canadian public on reimbursement decision-making for drugs for rare diseases: a national online survey
title_fullStr Engaging the Canadian public on reimbursement decision-making for drugs for rare diseases: a national online survey
title_full_unstemmed Engaging the Canadian public on reimbursement decision-making for drugs for rare diseases: a national online survey
title_short Engaging the Canadian public on reimbursement decision-making for drugs for rare diseases: a national online survey
title_sort engaging the canadian public on reimbursement decision-making for drugs for rare diseases: a national online survey
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5446683/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28549479
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017-2310-4
work_keys_str_mv AT polisenajulie engagingthecanadianpubliconreimbursementdecisionmakingfordrugsforrarediseasesanationalonlinesurvey
AT burgessmichael engagingthecanadianpubliconreimbursementdecisionmakingfordrugsforrarediseasesanationalonlinesurvey
AT mittoncraig engagingthecanadianpubliconreimbursementdecisionmakingfordrugsforrarediseasesanationalonlinesurvey
AT lyndlarryd engagingthecanadianpubliconreimbursementdecisionmakingfordrugsforrarediseasesanationalonlinesurvey