Cargando…

Comparing motivational, self-regulatory and habitual processes in a computer-tailored physical activity intervention in hospital employees - protocol for the PATHS randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Most people do not engage in sufficient physical activity to confer health benefits and to reduce risk of chronic disease. Healthcare professionals frequently provide guidance on physical activity, but often do not meet guideline levels of physical activity themselves. The main objective...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kwasnicka, Dominika, Vandelanotte, Corneel, Rebar, Amanda, Gardner, Benjamin, Short, Camille, Duncan, Mitch, Crook, Dawn, Hagger, Martin S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5446723/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28549476
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4415-4
_version_ 1783239146858348544
author Kwasnicka, Dominika
Vandelanotte, Corneel
Rebar, Amanda
Gardner, Benjamin
Short, Camille
Duncan, Mitch
Crook, Dawn
Hagger, Martin S.
author_facet Kwasnicka, Dominika
Vandelanotte, Corneel
Rebar, Amanda
Gardner, Benjamin
Short, Camille
Duncan, Mitch
Crook, Dawn
Hagger, Martin S.
author_sort Kwasnicka, Dominika
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Most people do not engage in sufficient physical activity to confer health benefits and to reduce risk of chronic disease. Healthcare professionals frequently provide guidance on physical activity, but often do not meet guideline levels of physical activity themselves. The main objective of this study is to develop and test the efficacy of a tailored intervention to increase healthcare professionals’ physical activity participation and quality of life, and to reduce work-related stress and absenteeism. This is the first study to compare the additive effects of three forms of a tailored intervention using different techniques from behavioural theory, which differ according to their focus on motivational, self-regulatory and/or habitual processes. METHODS/DESIGN: Healthcare professionals (N = 192) will be recruited from four hospitals in Perth, Western Australia, via email lists, leaflets, and posters to participate in the four group randomised controlled trial. Participants will be randomised to one of four conditions: (1) education only (non-tailored information only), (2) education plus intervention components to enhance motivation, (3) education plus components to enhance motivation and self-regulation, and (4) education plus components to enhance motivation, self-regulation and habit formation. All intervention groups will receive a computer-tailored intervention administered via a web-based platform and will receive supporting text-messages containing tailored information, prompts and feedback relevant to each condition. All outcomes will be assessed at baseline, and at 3-month follow-up. The primary outcome assessed in this study is physical activity measured using activity monitors. Secondary outcomes include: quality of life, stress, anxiety, sleep, and absenteeism. Website engagement, retention, preferences and intervention fidelity will also be evaluated as well as potential mediators and moderators of intervention effect. DISCUSSION: This is the first study to examine a tailored, technology-supported intervention aiming to increase physical activity in healthcare professionals. The study will evaluate whether including additional theory-based behaviour change techniques aimed at promoting motivation, self-regulation and habit will lead to increased physical activity participation relative to information alone. The online platform developed in this study has potential to deliver efficient, scalable and personally-relevant intervention that can be translated to other occupational settings. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New-Zealand Clinical Trial Registry: ACTRN12616000462482, submitted 29/03/2016, prospectively registered 8/04/2016.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5446723
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54467232017-05-30 Comparing motivational, self-regulatory and habitual processes in a computer-tailored physical activity intervention in hospital employees - protocol for the PATHS randomised controlled trial Kwasnicka, Dominika Vandelanotte, Corneel Rebar, Amanda Gardner, Benjamin Short, Camille Duncan, Mitch Crook, Dawn Hagger, Martin S. BMC Public Health Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Most people do not engage in sufficient physical activity to confer health benefits and to reduce risk of chronic disease. Healthcare professionals frequently provide guidance on physical activity, but often do not meet guideline levels of physical activity themselves. The main objective of this study is to develop and test the efficacy of a tailored intervention to increase healthcare professionals’ physical activity participation and quality of life, and to reduce work-related stress and absenteeism. This is the first study to compare the additive effects of three forms of a tailored intervention using different techniques from behavioural theory, which differ according to their focus on motivational, self-regulatory and/or habitual processes. METHODS/DESIGN: Healthcare professionals (N = 192) will be recruited from four hospitals in Perth, Western Australia, via email lists, leaflets, and posters to participate in the four group randomised controlled trial. Participants will be randomised to one of four conditions: (1) education only (non-tailored information only), (2) education plus intervention components to enhance motivation, (3) education plus components to enhance motivation and self-regulation, and (4) education plus components to enhance motivation, self-regulation and habit formation. All intervention groups will receive a computer-tailored intervention administered via a web-based platform and will receive supporting text-messages containing tailored information, prompts and feedback relevant to each condition. All outcomes will be assessed at baseline, and at 3-month follow-up. The primary outcome assessed in this study is physical activity measured using activity monitors. Secondary outcomes include: quality of life, stress, anxiety, sleep, and absenteeism. Website engagement, retention, preferences and intervention fidelity will also be evaluated as well as potential mediators and moderators of intervention effect. DISCUSSION: This is the first study to examine a tailored, technology-supported intervention aiming to increase physical activity in healthcare professionals. The study will evaluate whether including additional theory-based behaviour change techniques aimed at promoting motivation, self-regulation and habit will lead to increased physical activity participation relative to information alone. The online platform developed in this study has potential to deliver efficient, scalable and personally-relevant intervention that can be translated to other occupational settings. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New-Zealand Clinical Trial Registry: ACTRN12616000462482, submitted 29/03/2016, prospectively registered 8/04/2016. BioMed Central 2017-05-26 /pmc/articles/PMC5446723/ /pubmed/28549476 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4415-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Kwasnicka, Dominika
Vandelanotte, Corneel
Rebar, Amanda
Gardner, Benjamin
Short, Camille
Duncan, Mitch
Crook, Dawn
Hagger, Martin S.
Comparing motivational, self-regulatory and habitual processes in a computer-tailored physical activity intervention in hospital employees - protocol for the PATHS randomised controlled trial
title Comparing motivational, self-regulatory and habitual processes in a computer-tailored physical activity intervention in hospital employees - protocol for the PATHS randomised controlled trial
title_full Comparing motivational, self-regulatory and habitual processes in a computer-tailored physical activity intervention in hospital employees - protocol for the PATHS randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Comparing motivational, self-regulatory and habitual processes in a computer-tailored physical activity intervention in hospital employees - protocol for the PATHS randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Comparing motivational, self-regulatory and habitual processes in a computer-tailored physical activity intervention in hospital employees - protocol for the PATHS randomised controlled trial
title_short Comparing motivational, self-regulatory and habitual processes in a computer-tailored physical activity intervention in hospital employees - protocol for the PATHS randomised controlled trial
title_sort comparing motivational, self-regulatory and habitual processes in a computer-tailored physical activity intervention in hospital employees - protocol for the paths randomised controlled trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5446723/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28549476
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4415-4
work_keys_str_mv AT kwasnickadominika comparingmotivationalselfregulatoryandhabitualprocessesinacomputertailoredphysicalactivityinterventioninhospitalemployeesprotocolforthepathsrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT vandelanottecorneel comparingmotivationalselfregulatoryandhabitualprocessesinacomputertailoredphysicalactivityinterventioninhospitalemployeesprotocolforthepathsrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT rebaramanda comparingmotivationalselfregulatoryandhabitualprocessesinacomputertailoredphysicalactivityinterventioninhospitalemployeesprotocolforthepathsrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT gardnerbenjamin comparingmotivationalselfregulatoryandhabitualprocessesinacomputertailoredphysicalactivityinterventioninhospitalemployeesprotocolforthepathsrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT shortcamille comparingmotivationalselfregulatoryandhabitualprocessesinacomputertailoredphysicalactivityinterventioninhospitalemployeesprotocolforthepathsrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT duncanmitch comparingmotivationalselfregulatoryandhabitualprocessesinacomputertailoredphysicalactivityinterventioninhospitalemployeesprotocolforthepathsrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT crookdawn comparingmotivationalselfregulatoryandhabitualprocessesinacomputertailoredphysicalactivityinterventioninhospitalemployeesprotocolforthepathsrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT haggermartins comparingmotivationalselfregulatoryandhabitualprocessesinacomputertailoredphysicalactivityinterventioninhospitalemployeesprotocolforthepathsrandomisedcontrolledtrial