Cargando…

Contrasting evolutionary genome dynamics between domesticated and wild yeasts

Structural rearrangements have long been recognized as an important source of genetic variation with implications in phenotypic diversity and disease, yet their detailed evolutionary dynamics remain elusive. Here, we use long-read sequencing to generate end-to-end genome assemblies for 12 strains re...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yue, Jia-Xing, Li, Jing, Aigrain, Louise, Hallin, Johan, Persson, Karl, Oliver, Karen, Bergström, Anders, Coupland, Paul, Warringer, Jonas, Lagomarsino, Marco Consentino, Fischer, Gilles, Durbin, Richard, Liti, Gianni
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5446901/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28416820
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ng.3847
Descripción
Sumario:Structural rearrangements have long been recognized as an important source of genetic variation with implications in phenotypic diversity and disease, yet their detailed evolutionary dynamics remain elusive. Here, we use long-read sequencing to generate end-to-end genome assemblies for 12 strains representing major subpopulations of the partially domesticated yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae and its wild relative Saccharomyces paradoxus. These population-level high-quality genomes with comprehensive annotation allow for the first time a precise definition of chromosomal boundaries between cores and subtelomeres and a high-resolution view of evolutionary genome dynamics. In chromosomal cores, S. paradoxus exhibits faster accumulation of balanced rearrangements (inversions, reciprocal translocations and transpositions) whereas S. cerevisiae accumulates unbalanced rearrangements (novel insertions, deletions and duplications) more rapidly. In subtelomeres, both species show extensive interchromosomal reshuffling, with a higher tempo in S. cerevisiae. Such striking contrasts between wild and domesticated yeasts likely reflect the influence of human activities on structural genome evolution.