Cargando…

Intra- and Postoperative Electrocochleography May Be Predictive of Final Electrode Position and Postoperative Hearing Preservation

Introduction: The objectives of the current study were to (1) determine the relationship between electrocochleography (ECochG), measured from the cochlear implant (CI) electrode array during and after implantation, and postoperative audiometric thresholds, (2) determine the relationship between ECoc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: O'Connell, Brendan P., Holder, Jourdan T., Dwyer, Robert T., Gifford, René H., Noble, Jack H., Bennett, Marc L., Rivas, Alejandro, Wanna, George B., Haynes, David S., Labadie, Robert F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5447029/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28611574
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2017.00291
_version_ 1783239222335897600
author O'Connell, Brendan P.
Holder, Jourdan T.
Dwyer, Robert T.
Gifford, René H.
Noble, Jack H.
Bennett, Marc L.
Rivas, Alejandro
Wanna, George B.
Haynes, David S.
Labadie, Robert F.
author_facet O'Connell, Brendan P.
Holder, Jourdan T.
Dwyer, Robert T.
Gifford, René H.
Noble, Jack H.
Bennett, Marc L.
Rivas, Alejandro
Wanna, George B.
Haynes, David S.
Labadie, Robert F.
author_sort O'Connell, Brendan P.
collection PubMed
description Introduction: The objectives of the current study were to (1) determine the relationship between electrocochleography (ECochG), measured from the cochlear implant (CI) electrode array during and after implantation, and postoperative audiometric thresholds, (2) determine the relationship between ECochG amplitude and electrode scalar location determined by computerized tomography (CT); and (3) determine whether changes in cochlear microphonic (CM) amplitude during electrode insertion were associated with postoperative hearing. Materials and Methods: Eighteen subjects undergoing CI with an Advanced Bionics Mid-Scala device were prospectively studied. ECochG responses were recorded using the implant coupled to a custom signal recording unit. ECochG amplitude collected intraoperatively concurrent with CI insertion and at activation was compared with audiometric thresholds postoperatively. Sixteen patients also underwent postoperative CT to determine scalar location and the relationship to ECochG measures and residual hearing. Results: Mean low-frequency pure tone average (LFPTA) increased following surgery by an average of 28 dB (range 8–50). Threshold elevation was significantly greater for electrodes with scalar dislocation. No correlation was found between intraoperative ECochG and postoperative behavioral thresholds collapsed across frequency; however, mean differences in thresholds measured by intraoperative ECochG and postoperative audiometry were significantly smaller for electrodes inserted completely within scala tympani (ST) vs. those translocating from ST to scala vestibuli. A significant correlation was observed between postoperative ECochG thresholds and behavioral thresholds obtained at activation. Discussion: Postoperative audiometry currently serves as a marker for intracochlear trauma though thresholds are not obtained until device activation or later. When measured at the same time-point postoperatively, low-frequency ECochG thresholds correlated with behavioral thresholds. Intraoperative ECochG thresholds, however, did not correlate significantly with postoperative behavioral thresholds suggesting that changes in cochlear physiology occur between electrode insertion and activation. ECochG may hold clinical utility providing surgeons with feedback regarding insertion trauma due to scalar translocation, which may be predictive of postoperative hearing preservation. Conclusion: CI insertion trauma is generally not evident until postoperative audiometry when loss of residual hearing is confirmed. ECochG has potential to provide estimates of trauma during insertion as well as reliable information regarding degree of hearing preservation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5447029
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54470292017-06-13 Intra- and Postoperative Electrocochleography May Be Predictive of Final Electrode Position and Postoperative Hearing Preservation O'Connell, Brendan P. Holder, Jourdan T. Dwyer, Robert T. Gifford, René H. Noble, Jack H. Bennett, Marc L. Rivas, Alejandro Wanna, George B. Haynes, David S. Labadie, Robert F. Front Neurosci Neuroscience Introduction: The objectives of the current study were to (1) determine the relationship between electrocochleography (ECochG), measured from the cochlear implant (CI) electrode array during and after implantation, and postoperative audiometric thresholds, (2) determine the relationship between ECochG amplitude and electrode scalar location determined by computerized tomography (CT); and (3) determine whether changes in cochlear microphonic (CM) amplitude during electrode insertion were associated with postoperative hearing. Materials and Methods: Eighteen subjects undergoing CI with an Advanced Bionics Mid-Scala device were prospectively studied. ECochG responses were recorded using the implant coupled to a custom signal recording unit. ECochG amplitude collected intraoperatively concurrent with CI insertion and at activation was compared with audiometric thresholds postoperatively. Sixteen patients also underwent postoperative CT to determine scalar location and the relationship to ECochG measures and residual hearing. Results: Mean low-frequency pure tone average (LFPTA) increased following surgery by an average of 28 dB (range 8–50). Threshold elevation was significantly greater for electrodes with scalar dislocation. No correlation was found between intraoperative ECochG and postoperative behavioral thresholds collapsed across frequency; however, mean differences in thresholds measured by intraoperative ECochG and postoperative audiometry were significantly smaller for electrodes inserted completely within scala tympani (ST) vs. those translocating from ST to scala vestibuli. A significant correlation was observed between postoperative ECochG thresholds and behavioral thresholds obtained at activation. Discussion: Postoperative audiometry currently serves as a marker for intracochlear trauma though thresholds are not obtained until device activation or later. When measured at the same time-point postoperatively, low-frequency ECochG thresholds correlated with behavioral thresholds. Intraoperative ECochG thresholds, however, did not correlate significantly with postoperative behavioral thresholds suggesting that changes in cochlear physiology occur between electrode insertion and activation. ECochG may hold clinical utility providing surgeons with feedback regarding insertion trauma due to scalar translocation, which may be predictive of postoperative hearing preservation. Conclusion: CI insertion trauma is generally not evident until postoperative audiometry when loss of residual hearing is confirmed. ECochG has potential to provide estimates of trauma during insertion as well as reliable information regarding degree of hearing preservation. Frontiers Media S.A. 2017-05-29 /pmc/articles/PMC5447029/ /pubmed/28611574 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2017.00291 Text en Copyright © 2017 O'Connell, Holder, Dwyer, Gifford, Noble, Bennett, Rivas, Wanna, Haynes and Labadie. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
O'Connell, Brendan P.
Holder, Jourdan T.
Dwyer, Robert T.
Gifford, René H.
Noble, Jack H.
Bennett, Marc L.
Rivas, Alejandro
Wanna, George B.
Haynes, David S.
Labadie, Robert F.
Intra- and Postoperative Electrocochleography May Be Predictive of Final Electrode Position and Postoperative Hearing Preservation
title Intra- and Postoperative Electrocochleography May Be Predictive of Final Electrode Position and Postoperative Hearing Preservation
title_full Intra- and Postoperative Electrocochleography May Be Predictive of Final Electrode Position and Postoperative Hearing Preservation
title_fullStr Intra- and Postoperative Electrocochleography May Be Predictive of Final Electrode Position and Postoperative Hearing Preservation
title_full_unstemmed Intra- and Postoperative Electrocochleography May Be Predictive of Final Electrode Position and Postoperative Hearing Preservation
title_short Intra- and Postoperative Electrocochleography May Be Predictive of Final Electrode Position and Postoperative Hearing Preservation
title_sort intra- and postoperative electrocochleography may be predictive of final electrode position and postoperative hearing preservation
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5447029/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28611574
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2017.00291
work_keys_str_mv AT oconnellbrendanp intraandpostoperativeelectrocochleographymaybepredictiveoffinalelectrodepositionandpostoperativehearingpreservation
AT holderjourdant intraandpostoperativeelectrocochleographymaybepredictiveoffinalelectrodepositionandpostoperativehearingpreservation
AT dwyerrobertt intraandpostoperativeelectrocochleographymaybepredictiveoffinalelectrodepositionandpostoperativehearingpreservation
AT giffordreneh intraandpostoperativeelectrocochleographymaybepredictiveoffinalelectrodepositionandpostoperativehearingpreservation
AT noblejackh intraandpostoperativeelectrocochleographymaybepredictiveoffinalelectrodepositionandpostoperativehearingpreservation
AT bennettmarcl intraandpostoperativeelectrocochleographymaybepredictiveoffinalelectrodepositionandpostoperativehearingpreservation
AT rivasalejandro intraandpostoperativeelectrocochleographymaybepredictiveoffinalelectrodepositionandpostoperativehearingpreservation
AT wannageorgeb intraandpostoperativeelectrocochleographymaybepredictiveoffinalelectrodepositionandpostoperativehearingpreservation
AT haynesdavids intraandpostoperativeelectrocochleographymaybepredictiveoffinalelectrodepositionandpostoperativehearingpreservation
AT labadierobertf intraandpostoperativeelectrocochleographymaybepredictiveoffinalelectrodepositionandpostoperativehearingpreservation