Cargando…
Gamma knife radiosurgery for the treatment of uveal melanoma and uveal metastases
BACKGROUND: This study retrospectively analyzed outcomes for patients undergoing gamma knife radiosurgery (GKR) for uveal melanoma (UM) and intraocular metastases. METHODS: Patients who underwent GKR for UM or intraocular metastases between 1/1/1990 and 6/1/2015 at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA, w...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5447304/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28560050 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40942-017-0070-2 |
_version_ | 1783239307644895232 |
---|---|
author | Reynolds, Margaret M. Arnett, Andrea L. Parney, Ian F. Kumar, Ravi Laack, Nadia N. Maloney, Patrick R. Kozelsky, Timothy F. Garces, Yolanda I. Foote, Robert L. Pulido, Jose S. |
author_facet | Reynolds, Margaret M. Arnett, Andrea L. Parney, Ian F. Kumar, Ravi Laack, Nadia N. Maloney, Patrick R. Kozelsky, Timothy F. Garces, Yolanda I. Foote, Robert L. Pulido, Jose S. |
author_sort | Reynolds, Margaret M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: This study retrospectively analyzed outcomes for patients undergoing gamma knife radiosurgery (GKR) for uveal melanoma (UM) and intraocular metastases. METHODS: Patients who underwent GKR for UM or intraocular metastases between 1/1/1990 and 6/1/2015 at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA, were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: Eleven patients (11 eyes) had UM while seven patients (7 eyes) had intraocular metastases. Patients with UM were followed for a median of 19.74 ± 10.4 months. Visual acuity (VA) logMAR 0.30 ± 0.53 (Snellen 20/40) versus 0.40 ± 0.97 (Snellen 20/50), tumor thickness (5.30 ± 2.17 vs. 3.60 ± 2.32 mm), were not significantly different between preoperative and postoperative measurements, respectively. Nine percent (1/11) patients required enucleation. Subsequently, no patients experienced metastases. Patients with intraocular metastases were followed for a median of 6.03 ± 6.32 months. They did not have significant changes in VA (logMAR 0.30 ± 0.59 vs. 0.30 ± 1.57; Snellen 20/40 vs. 20/40) or tumor thickness (3.50 ± 1.36 vs. 1.30 ± 0.76 mm) postoperatively. Fourteen percent (1/7 patients) required enucleation. Complications experienced by patients with UM include radiation retinopathy (2/11), papillopathy (1/11), cystoid macular edema (1/11), vitreomacular traction (1/11), exudative retinal detachment (1/11). Patients with metastases had treatment complicated by recurrence (2/7). Dose to the margin, maximum dose of radiation, and clinical target volume did not correlate with post-procedural VA, risk of enucleation, or death in patients with either UM or patients with intraocular metastases. CONCLUSIONS: Visual outcomes were satisfactory for patients undergoing GKR without significant morbidity and without significant risk of enucleation or metastases. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5447304 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54473042017-05-30 Gamma knife radiosurgery for the treatment of uveal melanoma and uveal metastases Reynolds, Margaret M. Arnett, Andrea L. Parney, Ian F. Kumar, Ravi Laack, Nadia N. Maloney, Patrick R. Kozelsky, Timothy F. Garces, Yolanda I. Foote, Robert L. Pulido, Jose S. Int J Retina Vitreous Original Article BACKGROUND: This study retrospectively analyzed outcomes for patients undergoing gamma knife radiosurgery (GKR) for uveal melanoma (UM) and intraocular metastases. METHODS: Patients who underwent GKR for UM or intraocular metastases between 1/1/1990 and 6/1/2015 at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA, were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: Eleven patients (11 eyes) had UM while seven patients (7 eyes) had intraocular metastases. Patients with UM were followed for a median of 19.74 ± 10.4 months. Visual acuity (VA) logMAR 0.30 ± 0.53 (Snellen 20/40) versus 0.40 ± 0.97 (Snellen 20/50), tumor thickness (5.30 ± 2.17 vs. 3.60 ± 2.32 mm), were not significantly different between preoperative and postoperative measurements, respectively. Nine percent (1/11) patients required enucleation. Subsequently, no patients experienced metastases. Patients with intraocular metastases were followed for a median of 6.03 ± 6.32 months. They did not have significant changes in VA (logMAR 0.30 ± 0.59 vs. 0.30 ± 1.57; Snellen 20/40 vs. 20/40) or tumor thickness (3.50 ± 1.36 vs. 1.30 ± 0.76 mm) postoperatively. Fourteen percent (1/7 patients) required enucleation. Complications experienced by patients with UM include radiation retinopathy (2/11), papillopathy (1/11), cystoid macular edema (1/11), vitreomacular traction (1/11), exudative retinal detachment (1/11). Patients with metastases had treatment complicated by recurrence (2/7). Dose to the margin, maximum dose of radiation, and clinical target volume did not correlate with post-procedural VA, risk of enucleation, or death in patients with either UM or patients with intraocular metastases. CONCLUSIONS: Visual outcomes were satisfactory for patients undergoing GKR without significant morbidity and without significant risk of enucleation or metastases. BioMed Central 2017-05-29 /pmc/articles/PMC5447304/ /pubmed/28560050 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40942-017-0070-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Reynolds, Margaret M. Arnett, Andrea L. Parney, Ian F. Kumar, Ravi Laack, Nadia N. Maloney, Patrick R. Kozelsky, Timothy F. Garces, Yolanda I. Foote, Robert L. Pulido, Jose S. Gamma knife radiosurgery for the treatment of uveal melanoma and uveal metastases |
title | Gamma knife radiosurgery for the treatment of uveal melanoma and uveal metastases |
title_full | Gamma knife radiosurgery for the treatment of uveal melanoma and uveal metastases |
title_fullStr | Gamma knife radiosurgery for the treatment of uveal melanoma and uveal metastases |
title_full_unstemmed | Gamma knife radiosurgery for the treatment of uveal melanoma and uveal metastases |
title_short | Gamma knife radiosurgery for the treatment of uveal melanoma and uveal metastases |
title_sort | gamma knife radiosurgery for the treatment of uveal melanoma and uveal metastases |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5447304/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28560050 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40942-017-0070-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT reynoldsmargaretm gammakniferadiosurgeryforthetreatmentofuvealmelanomaanduvealmetastases AT arnettandreal gammakniferadiosurgeryforthetreatmentofuvealmelanomaanduvealmetastases AT parneyianf gammakniferadiosurgeryforthetreatmentofuvealmelanomaanduvealmetastases AT kumarravi gammakniferadiosurgeryforthetreatmentofuvealmelanomaanduvealmetastases AT laacknadian gammakniferadiosurgeryforthetreatmentofuvealmelanomaanduvealmetastases AT maloneypatrickr gammakniferadiosurgeryforthetreatmentofuvealmelanomaanduvealmetastases AT kozelskytimothyf gammakniferadiosurgeryforthetreatmentofuvealmelanomaanduvealmetastases AT garcesyolandai gammakniferadiosurgeryforthetreatmentofuvealmelanomaanduvealmetastases AT footerobertl gammakniferadiosurgeryforthetreatmentofuvealmelanomaanduvealmetastases AT pulidojoses gammakniferadiosurgeryforthetreatmentofuvealmelanomaanduvealmetastases |