Cargando…

Gamma knife radiosurgery for the treatment of uveal melanoma and uveal metastases

BACKGROUND: This study retrospectively analyzed outcomes for patients undergoing gamma knife radiosurgery (GKR) for uveal melanoma (UM) and intraocular metastases. METHODS: Patients who underwent GKR for UM or intraocular metastases between 1/1/1990 and 6/1/2015 at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA, w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Reynolds, Margaret M., Arnett, Andrea L., Parney, Ian F., Kumar, Ravi, Laack, Nadia N., Maloney, Patrick R., Kozelsky, Timothy F., Garces, Yolanda I., Foote, Robert L., Pulido, Jose S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5447304/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28560050
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40942-017-0070-2
_version_ 1783239307644895232
author Reynolds, Margaret M.
Arnett, Andrea L.
Parney, Ian F.
Kumar, Ravi
Laack, Nadia N.
Maloney, Patrick R.
Kozelsky, Timothy F.
Garces, Yolanda I.
Foote, Robert L.
Pulido, Jose S.
author_facet Reynolds, Margaret M.
Arnett, Andrea L.
Parney, Ian F.
Kumar, Ravi
Laack, Nadia N.
Maloney, Patrick R.
Kozelsky, Timothy F.
Garces, Yolanda I.
Foote, Robert L.
Pulido, Jose S.
author_sort Reynolds, Margaret M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This study retrospectively analyzed outcomes for patients undergoing gamma knife radiosurgery (GKR) for uveal melanoma (UM) and intraocular metastases. METHODS: Patients who underwent GKR for UM or intraocular metastases between 1/1/1990 and 6/1/2015 at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA, were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: Eleven patients (11 eyes) had UM while seven patients (7 eyes) had intraocular metastases. Patients with UM were followed for a median of 19.74 ± 10.4 months. Visual acuity (VA) logMAR 0.30 ± 0.53 (Snellen 20/40) versus 0.40 ± 0.97 (Snellen 20/50), tumor thickness (5.30 ± 2.17 vs. 3.60 ± 2.32 mm), were not significantly different between preoperative and postoperative measurements, respectively. Nine percent (1/11) patients required enucleation. Subsequently, no patients experienced metastases. Patients with intraocular metastases were followed for a median of 6.03 ± 6.32 months. They did not have significant changes in VA (logMAR 0.30 ± 0.59 vs. 0.30 ± 1.57; Snellen 20/40 vs. 20/40) or tumor thickness (3.50 ± 1.36 vs. 1.30 ± 0.76 mm) postoperatively. Fourteen percent (1/7 patients) required enucleation. Complications experienced by patients with UM include radiation retinopathy (2/11), papillopathy (1/11), cystoid macular edema (1/11), vitreomacular traction (1/11), exudative retinal detachment (1/11). Patients with metastases had treatment complicated by recurrence (2/7). Dose to the margin, maximum dose of radiation, and clinical target volume did not correlate with post-procedural VA, risk of enucleation, or death in patients with either UM or patients with intraocular metastases. CONCLUSIONS: Visual outcomes were satisfactory for patients undergoing GKR without significant morbidity and without significant risk of enucleation or metastases.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5447304
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54473042017-05-30 Gamma knife radiosurgery for the treatment of uveal melanoma and uveal metastases Reynolds, Margaret M. Arnett, Andrea L. Parney, Ian F. Kumar, Ravi Laack, Nadia N. Maloney, Patrick R. Kozelsky, Timothy F. Garces, Yolanda I. Foote, Robert L. Pulido, Jose S. Int J Retina Vitreous Original Article BACKGROUND: This study retrospectively analyzed outcomes for patients undergoing gamma knife radiosurgery (GKR) for uveal melanoma (UM) and intraocular metastases. METHODS: Patients who underwent GKR for UM or intraocular metastases between 1/1/1990 and 6/1/2015 at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA, were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: Eleven patients (11 eyes) had UM while seven patients (7 eyes) had intraocular metastases. Patients with UM were followed for a median of 19.74 ± 10.4 months. Visual acuity (VA) logMAR 0.30 ± 0.53 (Snellen 20/40) versus 0.40 ± 0.97 (Snellen 20/50), tumor thickness (5.30 ± 2.17 vs. 3.60 ± 2.32 mm), were not significantly different between preoperative and postoperative measurements, respectively. Nine percent (1/11) patients required enucleation. Subsequently, no patients experienced metastases. Patients with intraocular metastases were followed for a median of 6.03 ± 6.32 months. They did not have significant changes in VA (logMAR 0.30 ± 0.59 vs. 0.30 ± 1.57; Snellen 20/40 vs. 20/40) or tumor thickness (3.50 ± 1.36 vs. 1.30 ± 0.76 mm) postoperatively. Fourteen percent (1/7 patients) required enucleation. Complications experienced by patients with UM include radiation retinopathy (2/11), papillopathy (1/11), cystoid macular edema (1/11), vitreomacular traction (1/11), exudative retinal detachment (1/11). Patients with metastases had treatment complicated by recurrence (2/7). Dose to the margin, maximum dose of radiation, and clinical target volume did not correlate with post-procedural VA, risk of enucleation, or death in patients with either UM or patients with intraocular metastases. CONCLUSIONS: Visual outcomes were satisfactory for patients undergoing GKR without significant morbidity and without significant risk of enucleation or metastases. BioMed Central 2017-05-29 /pmc/articles/PMC5447304/ /pubmed/28560050 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40942-017-0070-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Original Article
Reynolds, Margaret M.
Arnett, Andrea L.
Parney, Ian F.
Kumar, Ravi
Laack, Nadia N.
Maloney, Patrick R.
Kozelsky, Timothy F.
Garces, Yolanda I.
Foote, Robert L.
Pulido, Jose S.
Gamma knife radiosurgery for the treatment of uveal melanoma and uveal metastases
title Gamma knife radiosurgery for the treatment of uveal melanoma and uveal metastases
title_full Gamma knife radiosurgery for the treatment of uveal melanoma and uveal metastases
title_fullStr Gamma knife radiosurgery for the treatment of uveal melanoma and uveal metastases
title_full_unstemmed Gamma knife radiosurgery for the treatment of uveal melanoma and uveal metastases
title_short Gamma knife radiosurgery for the treatment of uveal melanoma and uveal metastases
title_sort gamma knife radiosurgery for the treatment of uveal melanoma and uveal metastases
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5447304/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28560050
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40942-017-0070-2
work_keys_str_mv AT reynoldsmargaretm gammakniferadiosurgeryforthetreatmentofuvealmelanomaanduvealmetastases
AT arnettandreal gammakniferadiosurgeryforthetreatmentofuvealmelanomaanduvealmetastases
AT parneyianf gammakniferadiosurgeryforthetreatmentofuvealmelanomaanduvealmetastases
AT kumarravi gammakniferadiosurgeryforthetreatmentofuvealmelanomaanduvealmetastases
AT laacknadian gammakniferadiosurgeryforthetreatmentofuvealmelanomaanduvealmetastases
AT maloneypatrickr gammakniferadiosurgeryforthetreatmentofuvealmelanomaanduvealmetastases
AT kozelskytimothyf gammakniferadiosurgeryforthetreatmentofuvealmelanomaanduvealmetastases
AT garcesyolandai gammakniferadiosurgeryforthetreatmentofuvealmelanomaanduvealmetastases
AT footerobertl gammakniferadiosurgeryforthetreatmentofuvealmelanomaanduvealmetastases
AT pulidojoses gammakniferadiosurgeryforthetreatmentofuvealmelanomaanduvealmetastases