Cargando…
Are Movement Artifacts in Magnetic Resonance Imaging a Real Problem?—A Narrative Review
Movement artifacts compromise image quality and may interfere with interpretation, especially in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) applications with low signal-to-noise ratio such as functional MRI or diffusion tensor imaging, and when imaging small lesions. High image resolution has high sensitivity...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5447676/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28611728 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2017.00232 |
_version_ | 1783239384523341824 |
---|---|
author | Havsteen, Inger Ohlhues, Anders Madsen, Kristoffer H. Nybing, Janus Damm Christensen, Hanne Christensen, Anders |
author_facet | Havsteen, Inger Ohlhues, Anders Madsen, Kristoffer H. Nybing, Janus Damm Christensen, Hanne Christensen, Anders |
author_sort | Havsteen, Inger |
collection | PubMed |
description | Movement artifacts compromise image quality and may interfere with interpretation, especially in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) applications with low signal-to-noise ratio such as functional MRI or diffusion tensor imaging, and when imaging small lesions. High image resolution has high sensitivity to motion artifacts and often prolongs scan time that again aggravates movement artifacts. During the scan fast imaging techniques and sequences, optimal receiver coils, careful patient positioning, and instruction may minimize movement artifacts. Physiological noise sources are motion from respiration, flow and pulse coupled to cardiac cycles, from the swallowing reflex and small spontaneous head movements. Par example, in resting-state functional MRI spontaneous neuronal activity adds 1–2% of signal change, even under optimal conditions signal contributions from physiological noise remain a considerable fraction hereof. Movement tracking during imaging may allow for prospective correction or postprocessing steps separating signal and noise. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5447676 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54476762017-06-13 Are Movement Artifacts in Magnetic Resonance Imaging a Real Problem?—A Narrative Review Havsteen, Inger Ohlhues, Anders Madsen, Kristoffer H. Nybing, Janus Damm Christensen, Hanne Christensen, Anders Front Neurol Neuroscience Movement artifacts compromise image quality and may interfere with interpretation, especially in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) applications with low signal-to-noise ratio such as functional MRI or diffusion tensor imaging, and when imaging small lesions. High image resolution has high sensitivity to motion artifacts and often prolongs scan time that again aggravates movement artifacts. During the scan fast imaging techniques and sequences, optimal receiver coils, careful patient positioning, and instruction may minimize movement artifacts. Physiological noise sources are motion from respiration, flow and pulse coupled to cardiac cycles, from the swallowing reflex and small spontaneous head movements. Par example, in resting-state functional MRI spontaneous neuronal activity adds 1–2% of signal change, even under optimal conditions signal contributions from physiological noise remain a considerable fraction hereof. Movement tracking during imaging may allow for prospective correction or postprocessing steps separating signal and noise. Frontiers Media S.A. 2017-05-30 /pmc/articles/PMC5447676/ /pubmed/28611728 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2017.00232 Text en Copyright © 2017 Havsteen, Ohlhues, Madsen, Nybing, Christensen and Christensen. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Neuroscience Havsteen, Inger Ohlhues, Anders Madsen, Kristoffer H. Nybing, Janus Damm Christensen, Hanne Christensen, Anders Are Movement Artifacts in Magnetic Resonance Imaging a Real Problem?—A Narrative Review |
title | Are Movement Artifacts in Magnetic Resonance Imaging a Real Problem?—A Narrative Review |
title_full | Are Movement Artifacts in Magnetic Resonance Imaging a Real Problem?—A Narrative Review |
title_fullStr | Are Movement Artifacts in Magnetic Resonance Imaging a Real Problem?—A Narrative Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Are Movement Artifacts in Magnetic Resonance Imaging a Real Problem?—A Narrative Review |
title_short | Are Movement Artifacts in Magnetic Resonance Imaging a Real Problem?—A Narrative Review |
title_sort | are movement artifacts in magnetic resonance imaging a real problem?—a narrative review |
topic | Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5447676/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28611728 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2017.00232 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT havsteeninger aremovementartifactsinmagneticresonanceimagingarealproblemanarrativereview AT ohlhuesanders aremovementartifactsinmagneticresonanceimagingarealproblemanarrativereview AT madsenkristofferh aremovementartifactsinmagneticresonanceimagingarealproblemanarrativereview AT nybingjanusdamm aremovementartifactsinmagneticresonanceimagingarealproblemanarrativereview AT christensenhanne aremovementartifactsinmagneticresonanceimagingarealproblemanarrativereview AT christensenanders aremovementartifactsinmagneticresonanceimagingarealproblemanarrativereview |