Cargando…

Are Movement Artifacts in Magnetic Resonance Imaging a Real Problem?—A Narrative Review

Movement artifacts compromise image quality and may interfere with interpretation, especially in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) applications with low signal-to-noise ratio such as functional MRI or diffusion tensor imaging, and when imaging small lesions. High image resolution has high sensitivity...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Havsteen, Inger, Ohlhues, Anders, Madsen, Kristoffer H., Nybing, Janus Damm, Christensen, Hanne, Christensen, Anders
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5447676/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28611728
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2017.00232
_version_ 1783239384523341824
author Havsteen, Inger
Ohlhues, Anders
Madsen, Kristoffer H.
Nybing, Janus Damm
Christensen, Hanne
Christensen, Anders
author_facet Havsteen, Inger
Ohlhues, Anders
Madsen, Kristoffer H.
Nybing, Janus Damm
Christensen, Hanne
Christensen, Anders
author_sort Havsteen, Inger
collection PubMed
description Movement artifacts compromise image quality and may interfere with interpretation, especially in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) applications with low signal-to-noise ratio such as functional MRI or diffusion tensor imaging, and when imaging small lesions. High image resolution has high sensitivity to motion artifacts and often prolongs scan time that again aggravates movement artifacts. During the scan fast imaging techniques and sequences, optimal receiver coils, careful patient positioning, and instruction may minimize movement artifacts. Physiological noise sources are motion from respiration, flow and pulse coupled to cardiac cycles, from the swallowing reflex and small spontaneous head movements. Par example, in resting-state functional MRI spontaneous neuronal activity adds 1–2% of signal change, even under optimal conditions signal contributions from physiological noise remain a considerable fraction hereof. Movement tracking during imaging may allow for prospective correction or postprocessing steps separating signal and noise.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5447676
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54476762017-06-13 Are Movement Artifacts in Magnetic Resonance Imaging a Real Problem?—A Narrative Review Havsteen, Inger Ohlhues, Anders Madsen, Kristoffer H. Nybing, Janus Damm Christensen, Hanne Christensen, Anders Front Neurol Neuroscience Movement artifacts compromise image quality and may interfere with interpretation, especially in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) applications with low signal-to-noise ratio such as functional MRI or diffusion tensor imaging, and when imaging small lesions. High image resolution has high sensitivity to motion artifacts and often prolongs scan time that again aggravates movement artifacts. During the scan fast imaging techniques and sequences, optimal receiver coils, careful patient positioning, and instruction may minimize movement artifacts. Physiological noise sources are motion from respiration, flow and pulse coupled to cardiac cycles, from the swallowing reflex and small spontaneous head movements. Par example, in resting-state functional MRI spontaneous neuronal activity adds 1–2% of signal change, even under optimal conditions signal contributions from physiological noise remain a considerable fraction hereof. Movement tracking during imaging may allow for prospective correction or postprocessing steps separating signal and noise. Frontiers Media S.A. 2017-05-30 /pmc/articles/PMC5447676/ /pubmed/28611728 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2017.00232 Text en Copyright © 2017 Havsteen, Ohlhues, Madsen, Nybing, Christensen and Christensen. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Havsteen, Inger
Ohlhues, Anders
Madsen, Kristoffer H.
Nybing, Janus Damm
Christensen, Hanne
Christensen, Anders
Are Movement Artifacts in Magnetic Resonance Imaging a Real Problem?—A Narrative Review
title Are Movement Artifacts in Magnetic Resonance Imaging a Real Problem?—A Narrative Review
title_full Are Movement Artifacts in Magnetic Resonance Imaging a Real Problem?—A Narrative Review
title_fullStr Are Movement Artifacts in Magnetic Resonance Imaging a Real Problem?—A Narrative Review
title_full_unstemmed Are Movement Artifacts in Magnetic Resonance Imaging a Real Problem?—A Narrative Review
title_short Are Movement Artifacts in Magnetic Resonance Imaging a Real Problem?—A Narrative Review
title_sort are movement artifacts in magnetic resonance imaging a real problem?—a narrative review
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5447676/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28611728
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2017.00232
work_keys_str_mv AT havsteeninger aremovementartifactsinmagneticresonanceimagingarealproblemanarrativereview
AT ohlhuesanders aremovementartifactsinmagneticresonanceimagingarealproblemanarrativereview
AT madsenkristofferh aremovementartifactsinmagneticresonanceimagingarealproblemanarrativereview
AT nybingjanusdamm aremovementartifactsinmagneticresonanceimagingarealproblemanarrativereview
AT christensenhanne aremovementartifactsinmagneticresonanceimagingarealproblemanarrativereview
AT christensenanders aremovementartifactsinmagneticresonanceimagingarealproblemanarrativereview