Cargando…

Contribution of Serologic Assays in the Evaluation of Influenza Virus Infection Rates and Vaccine Efficacy in Pregnant Women: Report From Randomized Controlled Trials

BACKGROUND. The utility of serologic testing to evaluate vaccine efficacy of seasonal inactivated influenza vaccine (IIV) is controversial. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of IIV against serologically diagnosed influenza infection (SDI) and reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction–confirmed...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Madhi, Shabir A., Nunes, Marta C., Weinberg, Adriana, Kuwanda, Locadiah, Hugo, Andrea, Jones, Stephanie, van Niekerk, Nadia, Ortiz, Justin R., Neuzil, Kathleen M., Klugman, Keith P., Simões, Eric A. F., Cutland, Clare L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5447878/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28369198
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cid/cix241
_version_ 1783239441440047104
author Madhi, Shabir A.
Nunes, Marta C.
Weinberg, Adriana
Kuwanda, Locadiah
Hugo, Andrea
Jones, Stephanie
van Niekerk, Nadia
Ortiz, Justin R.
Neuzil, Kathleen M.
Klugman, Keith P.
Simões, Eric A. F.
Cutland, Clare L.
author_facet Madhi, Shabir A.
Nunes, Marta C.
Weinberg, Adriana
Kuwanda, Locadiah
Hugo, Andrea
Jones, Stephanie
van Niekerk, Nadia
Ortiz, Justin R.
Neuzil, Kathleen M.
Klugman, Keith P.
Simões, Eric A. F.
Cutland, Clare L.
author_sort Madhi, Shabir A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND. The utility of serologic testing to evaluate vaccine efficacy of seasonal inactivated influenza vaccine (IIV) is controversial. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of IIV against serologically diagnosed influenza infection (SDI) and reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction–confirmed influenza illness (PCR-CI) in women vaccinated during pregnancy. METHODS. We undertook a post hoc analysis of 2 randomized clinical trials evaluating IIV efficacy among human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)–uninfected and HIV-infected pregnant women. SDI was defined as ≥4-fold increase in paired hemagglutinin antibody inhibition titers from 1 month postvaccination until end-of-study participation. PCR-CI was defined as molecular diagnostic evidence of influenza virus in pharyngeal specimens collected during clinical illness. RESULTS. Among placebo recipients, the respective incidence of PCR-CI and SDI was 5.6% and 35.0% in HIV-uninfected women and 20.5% and 43.6% among HIV-infected women. Vaccine efficacy in HIV-uninfected women was similar for PCR-CI (66.9%; 95% confidence interval [CI], –20.1% to 90.9%) and SDI (59.2%; 95% CI, 37.0%–73.5%); however, fewer women required vaccination to prevent 1 episode of SDI (5; 95% CI, 3–9) than PCR-CI (27; 95% CI, 12–∞). Also, vaccine efficacy was similar for PCR-CI (61.2%; 95% CI, 10.7%–83.2%) and SDI (60.9%; 95% CI, 33.9%–76.9%) in HIV-infected women, with 2-fold fewer women needing to be vaccinated to prevent SDI (4; 95% CI, 3–8) than PCR-CI (8; 95% CI, 4–52). CONCLUSIONS. Although vaccine efficacy was similar when measured for PCR-CI or SDI, IIV vaccination prevented a greater number of SDI than PCR-CI; the clinical relevance of the former warrants interrogation.Clinical Trials Registration. NCT01306669 and NCT01306682
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5447878
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54478782017-06-02 Contribution of Serologic Assays in the Evaluation of Influenza Virus Infection Rates and Vaccine Efficacy in Pregnant Women: Report From Randomized Controlled Trials Madhi, Shabir A. Nunes, Marta C. Weinberg, Adriana Kuwanda, Locadiah Hugo, Andrea Jones, Stephanie van Niekerk, Nadia Ortiz, Justin R. Neuzil, Kathleen M. Klugman, Keith P. Simões, Eric A. F. Cutland, Clare L. Clin Infect Dis Major Article BACKGROUND. The utility of serologic testing to evaluate vaccine efficacy of seasonal inactivated influenza vaccine (IIV) is controversial. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of IIV against serologically diagnosed influenza infection (SDI) and reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction–confirmed influenza illness (PCR-CI) in women vaccinated during pregnancy. METHODS. We undertook a post hoc analysis of 2 randomized clinical trials evaluating IIV efficacy among human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)–uninfected and HIV-infected pregnant women. SDI was defined as ≥4-fold increase in paired hemagglutinin antibody inhibition titers from 1 month postvaccination until end-of-study participation. PCR-CI was defined as molecular diagnostic evidence of influenza virus in pharyngeal specimens collected during clinical illness. RESULTS. Among placebo recipients, the respective incidence of PCR-CI and SDI was 5.6% and 35.0% in HIV-uninfected women and 20.5% and 43.6% among HIV-infected women. Vaccine efficacy in HIV-uninfected women was similar for PCR-CI (66.9%; 95% confidence interval [CI], –20.1% to 90.9%) and SDI (59.2%; 95% CI, 37.0%–73.5%); however, fewer women required vaccination to prevent 1 episode of SDI (5; 95% CI, 3–9) than PCR-CI (27; 95% CI, 12–∞). Also, vaccine efficacy was similar for PCR-CI (61.2%; 95% CI, 10.7%–83.2%) and SDI (60.9%; 95% CI, 33.9%–76.9%) in HIV-infected women, with 2-fold fewer women needing to be vaccinated to prevent SDI (4; 95% CI, 3–8) than PCR-CI (8; 95% CI, 4–52). CONCLUSIONS. Although vaccine efficacy was similar when measured for PCR-CI or SDI, IIV vaccination prevented a greater number of SDI than PCR-CI; the clinical relevance of the former warrants interrogation.Clinical Trials Registration. NCT01306669 and NCT01306682 Oxford University Press 2017-06-15 2017-03-21 /pmc/articles/PMC5447878/ /pubmed/28369198 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cid/cix241 Text en © The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press for the Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Major Article
Madhi, Shabir A.
Nunes, Marta C.
Weinberg, Adriana
Kuwanda, Locadiah
Hugo, Andrea
Jones, Stephanie
van Niekerk, Nadia
Ortiz, Justin R.
Neuzil, Kathleen M.
Klugman, Keith P.
Simões, Eric A. F.
Cutland, Clare L.
Contribution of Serologic Assays in the Evaluation of Influenza Virus Infection Rates and Vaccine Efficacy in Pregnant Women: Report From Randomized Controlled Trials
title Contribution of Serologic Assays in the Evaluation of Influenza Virus Infection Rates and Vaccine Efficacy in Pregnant Women: Report From Randomized Controlled Trials
title_full Contribution of Serologic Assays in the Evaluation of Influenza Virus Infection Rates and Vaccine Efficacy in Pregnant Women: Report From Randomized Controlled Trials
title_fullStr Contribution of Serologic Assays in the Evaluation of Influenza Virus Infection Rates and Vaccine Efficacy in Pregnant Women: Report From Randomized Controlled Trials
title_full_unstemmed Contribution of Serologic Assays in the Evaluation of Influenza Virus Infection Rates and Vaccine Efficacy in Pregnant Women: Report From Randomized Controlled Trials
title_short Contribution of Serologic Assays in the Evaluation of Influenza Virus Infection Rates and Vaccine Efficacy in Pregnant Women: Report From Randomized Controlled Trials
title_sort contribution of serologic assays in the evaluation of influenza virus infection rates and vaccine efficacy in pregnant women: report from randomized controlled trials
topic Major Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5447878/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28369198
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cid/cix241
work_keys_str_mv AT madhishabira contributionofserologicassaysintheevaluationofinfluenzavirusinfectionratesandvaccineefficacyinpregnantwomenreportfromrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT nunesmartac contributionofserologicassaysintheevaluationofinfluenzavirusinfectionratesandvaccineefficacyinpregnantwomenreportfromrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT weinbergadriana contributionofserologicassaysintheevaluationofinfluenzavirusinfectionratesandvaccineefficacyinpregnantwomenreportfromrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT kuwandalocadiah contributionofserologicassaysintheevaluationofinfluenzavirusinfectionratesandvaccineefficacyinpregnantwomenreportfromrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT hugoandrea contributionofserologicassaysintheevaluationofinfluenzavirusinfectionratesandvaccineefficacyinpregnantwomenreportfromrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT jonesstephanie contributionofserologicassaysintheevaluationofinfluenzavirusinfectionratesandvaccineefficacyinpregnantwomenreportfromrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT vanniekerknadia contributionofserologicassaysintheevaluationofinfluenzavirusinfectionratesandvaccineefficacyinpregnantwomenreportfromrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT ortizjustinr contributionofserologicassaysintheevaluationofinfluenzavirusinfectionratesandvaccineefficacyinpregnantwomenreportfromrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT neuzilkathleenm contributionofserologicassaysintheevaluationofinfluenzavirusinfectionratesandvaccineefficacyinpregnantwomenreportfromrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT klugmankeithp contributionofserologicassaysintheevaluationofinfluenzavirusinfectionratesandvaccineefficacyinpregnantwomenreportfromrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT simoesericaf contributionofserologicassaysintheevaluationofinfluenzavirusinfectionratesandvaccineefficacyinpregnantwomenreportfromrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT cutlandclarel contributionofserologicassaysintheevaluationofinfluenzavirusinfectionratesandvaccineefficacyinpregnantwomenreportfromrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT contributionofserologicassaysintheevaluationofinfluenzavirusinfectionratesandvaccineefficacyinpregnantwomenreportfromrandomizedcontrolledtrials