Cargando…
Contribution of Serologic Assays in the Evaluation of Influenza Virus Infection Rates and Vaccine Efficacy in Pregnant Women: Report From Randomized Controlled Trials
BACKGROUND. The utility of serologic testing to evaluate vaccine efficacy of seasonal inactivated influenza vaccine (IIV) is controversial. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of IIV against serologically diagnosed influenza infection (SDI) and reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction–confirmed...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5447878/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28369198 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cid/cix241 |
_version_ | 1783239441440047104 |
---|---|
author | Madhi, Shabir A. Nunes, Marta C. Weinberg, Adriana Kuwanda, Locadiah Hugo, Andrea Jones, Stephanie van Niekerk, Nadia Ortiz, Justin R. Neuzil, Kathleen M. Klugman, Keith P. Simões, Eric A. F. Cutland, Clare L. |
author_facet | Madhi, Shabir A. Nunes, Marta C. Weinberg, Adriana Kuwanda, Locadiah Hugo, Andrea Jones, Stephanie van Niekerk, Nadia Ortiz, Justin R. Neuzil, Kathleen M. Klugman, Keith P. Simões, Eric A. F. Cutland, Clare L. |
author_sort | Madhi, Shabir A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND. The utility of serologic testing to evaluate vaccine efficacy of seasonal inactivated influenza vaccine (IIV) is controversial. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of IIV against serologically diagnosed influenza infection (SDI) and reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction–confirmed influenza illness (PCR-CI) in women vaccinated during pregnancy. METHODS. We undertook a post hoc analysis of 2 randomized clinical trials evaluating IIV efficacy among human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)–uninfected and HIV-infected pregnant women. SDI was defined as ≥4-fold increase in paired hemagglutinin antibody inhibition titers from 1 month postvaccination until end-of-study participation. PCR-CI was defined as molecular diagnostic evidence of influenza virus in pharyngeal specimens collected during clinical illness. RESULTS. Among placebo recipients, the respective incidence of PCR-CI and SDI was 5.6% and 35.0% in HIV-uninfected women and 20.5% and 43.6% among HIV-infected women. Vaccine efficacy in HIV-uninfected women was similar for PCR-CI (66.9%; 95% confidence interval [CI], –20.1% to 90.9%) and SDI (59.2%; 95% CI, 37.0%–73.5%); however, fewer women required vaccination to prevent 1 episode of SDI (5; 95% CI, 3–9) than PCR-CI (27; 95% CI, 12–∞). Also, vaccine efficacy was similar for PCR-CI (61.2%; 95% CI, 10.7%–83.2%) and SDI (60.9%; 95% CI, 33.9%–76.9%) in HIV-infected women, with 2-fold fewer women needing to be vaccinated to prevent SDI (4; 95% CI, 3–8) than PCR-CI (8; 95% CI, 4–52). CONCLUSIONS. Although vaccine efficacy was similar when measured for PCR-CI or SDI, IIV vaccination prevented a greater number of SDI than PCR-CI; the clinical relevance of the former warrants interrogation.Clinical Trials Registration. NCT01306669 and NCT01306682 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5447878 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54478782017-06-02 Contribution of Serologic Assays in the Evaluation of Influenza Virus Infection Rates and Vaccine Efficacy in Pregnant Women: Report From Randomized Controlled Trials Madhi, Shabir A. Nunes, Marta C. Weinberg, Adriana Kuwanda, Locadiah Hugo, Andrea Jones, Stephanie van Niekerk, Nadia Ortiz, Justin R. Neuzil, Kathleen M. Klugman, Keith P. Simões, Eric A. F. Cutland, Clare L. Clin Infect Dis Major Article BACKGROUND. The utility of serologic testing to evaluate vaccine efficacy of seasonal inactivated influenza vaccine (IIV) is controversial. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of IIV against serologically diagnosed influenza infection (SDI) and reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction–confirmed influenza illness (PCR-CI) in women vaccinated during pregnancy. METHODS. We undertook a post hoc analysis of 2 randomized clinical trials evaluating IIV efficacy among human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)–uninfected and HIV-infected pregnant women. SDI was defined as ≥4-fold increase in paired hemagglutinin antibody inhibition titers from 1 month postvaccination until end-of-study participation. PCR-CI was defined as molecular diagnostic evidence of influenza virus in pharyngeal specimens collected during clinical illness. RESULTS. Among placebo recipients, the respective incidence of PCR-CI and SDI was 5.6% and 35.0% in HIV-uninfected women and 20.5% and 43.6% among HIV-infected women. Vaccine efficacy in HIV-uninfected women was similar for PCR-CI (66.9%; 95% confidence interval [CI], –20.1% to 90.9%) and SDI (59.2%; 95% CI, 37.0%–73.5%); however, fewer women required vaccination to prevent 1 episode of SDI (5; 95% CI, 3–9) than PCR-CI (27; 95% CI, 12–∞). Also, vaccine efficacy was similar for PCR-CI (61.2%; 95% CI, 10.7%–83.2%) and SDI (60.9%; 95% CI, 33.9%–76.9%) in HIV-infected women, with 2-fold fewer women needing to be vaccinated to prevent SDI (4; 95% CI, 3–8) than PCR-CI (8; 95% CI, 4–52). CONCLUSIONS. Although vaccine efficacy was similar when measured for PCR-CI or SDI, IIV vaccination prevented a greater number of SDI than PCR-CI; the clinical relevance of the former warrants interrogation.Clinical Trials Registration. NCT01306669 and NCT01306682 Oxford University Press 2017-06-15 2017-03-21 /pmc/articles/PMC5447878/ /pubmed/28369198 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cid/cix241 Text en © The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press for the Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Major Article Madhi, Shabir A. Nunes, Marta C. Weinberg, Adriana Kuwanda, Locadiah Hugo, Andrea Jones, Stephanie van Niekerk, Nadia Ortiz, Justin R. Neuzil, Kathleen M. Klugman, Keith P. Simões, Eric A. F. Cutland, Clare L. Contribution of Serologic Assays in the Evaluation of Influenza Virus Infection Rates and Vaccine Efficacy in Pregnant Women: Report From Randomized Controlled Trials |
title | Contribution of Serologic Assays in the Evaluation of Influenza Virus Infection Rates and Vaccine Efficacy in Pregnant Women: Report From Randomized Controlled Trials |
title_full | Contribution of Serologic Assays in the Evaluation of Influenza Virus Infection Rates and Vaccine Efficacy in Pregnant Women: Report From Randomized Controlled Trials |
title_fullStr | Contribution of Serologic Assays in the Evaluation of Influenza Virus Infection Rates and Vaccine Efficacy in Pregnant Women: Report From Randomized Controlled Trials |
title_full_unstemmed | Contribution of Serologic Assays in the Evaluation of Influenza Virus Infection Rates and Vaccine Efficacy in Pregnant Women: Report From Randomized Controlled Trials |
title_short | Contribution of Serologic Assays in the Evaluation of Influenza Virus Infection Rates and Vaccine Efficacy in Pregnant Women: Report From Randomized Controlled Trials |
title_sort | contribution of serologic assays in the evaluation of influenza virus infection rates and vaccine efficacy in pregnant women: report from randomized controlled trials |
topic | Major Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5447878/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28369198 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cid/cix241 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT madhishabira contributionofserologicassaysintheevaluationofinfluenzavirusinfectionratesandvaccineefficacyinpregnantwomenreportfromrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT nunesmartac contributionofserologicassaysintheevaluationofinfluenzavirusinfectionratesandvaccineefficacyinpregnantwomenreportfromrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT weinbergadriana contributionofserologicassaysintheevaluationofinfluenzavirusinfectionratesandvaccineefficacyinpregnantwomenreportfromrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT kuwandalocadiah contributionofserologicassaysintheevaluationofinfluenzavirusinfectionratesandvaccineefficacyinpregnantwomenreportfromrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT hugoandrea contributionofserologicassaysintheevaluationofinfluenzavirusinfectionratesandvaccineefficacyinpregnantwomenreportfromrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT jonesstephanie contributionofserologicassaysintheevaluationofinfluenzavirusinfectionratesandvaccineefficacyinpregnantwomenreportfromrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT vanniekerknadia contributionofserologicassaysintheevaluationofinfluenzavirusinfectionratesandvaccineefficacyinpregnantwomenreportfromrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT ortizjustinr contributionofserologicassaysintheevaluationofinfluenzavirusinfectionratesandvaccineefficacyinpregnantwomenreportfromrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT neuzilkathleenm contributionofserologicassaysintheevaluationofinfluenzavirusinfectionratesandvaccineefficacyinpregnantwomenreportfromrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT klugmankeithp contributionofserologicassaysintheevaluationofinfluenzavirusinfectionratesandvaccineefficacyinpregnantwomenreportfromrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT simoesericaf contributionofserologicassaysintheevaluationofinfluenzavirusinfectionratesandvaccineefficacyinpregnantwomenreportfromrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT cutlandclarel contributionofserologicassaysintheevaluationofinfluenzavirusinfectionratesandvaccineefficacyinpregnantwomenreportfromrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT contributionofserologicassaysintheevaluationofinfluenzavirusinfectionratesandvaccineefficacyinpregnantwomenreportfromrandomizedcontrolledtrials |