Cargando…

The Role of Radiofrequency Hyperthermia in The Radiosensitization of A Human Prostate Cancer Cell Line

OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated enhanced induced DNA damages and apoptosis of a spheroid culture of DU145 prostate cancer cells treated by a combination of radiofrequency hyperthermia (RF HT) with radiation treatment (RT) from an external radiotherapy machine compared to RT alone. MATERIALS AND METH...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Janati Esfahani, Azam, Mahdavi, Seied Rabi, Shiran, Mohammad Bagher, Khoei, Samideh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Royan Institute 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5448328/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28580312
http://dx.doi.org/10.22074/cellj.2017.4460
_version_ 1783239533376045056
author Janati Esfahani, Azam
Mahdavi, Seied Rabi
Shiran, Mohammad Bagher
Khoei, Samideh
author_facet Janati Esfahani, Azam
Mahdavi, Seied Rabi
Shiran, Mohammad Bagher
Khoei, Samideh
author_sort Janati Esfahani, Azam
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated enhanced induced DNA damages and apoptosis of a spheroid culture of DU145 prostate cancer cells treated by a combination of radiofrequency hyperthermia (RF HT) with radiation treatment (RT) from an external radiotherapy machine compared to RT alone. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this experimental study, DU145 cells were cultured as spheroids until they reached 300 µm in diameter. We exposed these cultures to either: RF HT for 90 minutes at 43˚C originated from a Celsius TCS system, RF HT followed by RT at doses of 2 Gy or 4 Gy (15 MV energy) with 15-minute interval, or RT alone at the above mentioned doses. The trypan blue exclusion assay, alkaline comet assay, and annexin V/PI flow cytometry were performed to measure cell viability, the amount of DNA damage in an individual cell as the tail moment, and percentage of induced cell apoptosis in response to treatments explained. RESULTS: We calculated the thermal enhancement factor (TEF) for the combined treatment regime. RF HT followed by the 4 Gy dose of RT resulted in minimum viability (85.33 ± 1.30%), the highest tail moment (1.98 ± 0.18), and highest percentage of apoptotic cells (64.48 ± 3.40%) compared to the other treatments. The results of the TEF assay were 2.54 from the comet assay and 2.33 according to flow cytometry. CONCLUSION: The present data suggest that combined treatment of mega voltage X-rays and RF HT can result in significant radiosensitization of prostate cancer cells.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5448328
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Royan Institute
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54483282017-06-02 The Role of Radiofrequency Hyperthermia in The Radiosensitization of A Human Prostate Cancer Cell Line Janati Esfahani, Azam Mahdavi, Seied Rabi Shiran, Mohammad Bagher Khoei, Samideh Cell J Original Article OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated enhanced induced DNA damages and apoptosis of a spheroid culture of DU145 prostate cancer cells treated by a combination of radiofrequency hyperthermia (RF HT) with radiation treatment (RT) from an external radiotherapy machine compared to RT alone. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this experimental study, DU145 cells were cultured as spheroids until they reached 300 µm in diameter. We exposed these cultures to either: RF HT for 90 minutes at 43˚C originated from a Celsius TCS system, RF HT followed by RT at doses of 2 Gy or 4 Gy (15 MV energy) with 15-minute interval, or RT alone at the above mentioned doses. The trypan blue exclusion assay, alkaline comet assay, and annexin V/PI flow cytometry were performed to measure cell viability, the amount of DNA damage in an individual cell as the tail moment, and percentage of induced cell apoptosis in response to treatments explained. RESULTS: We calculated the thermal enhancement factor (TEF) for the combined treatment regime. RF HT followed by the 4 Gy dose of RT resulted in minimum viability (85.33 ± 1.30%), the highest tail moment (1.98 ± 0.18), and highest percentage of apoptotic cells (64.48 ± 3.40%) compared to the other treatments. The results of the TEF assay were 2.54 from the comet assay and 2.33 according to flow cytometry. CONCLUSION: The present data suggest that combined treatment of mega voltage X-rays and RF HT can result in significant radiosensitization of prostate cancer cells. Royan Institute 2017 2017-05-17 /pmc/articles/PMC5448328/ /pubmed/28580312 http://dx.doi.org/10.22074/cellj.2017.4460 Text en Any use, distribution, reproduction or abstract of this publication in any medium, with the exception of commercial purposes, is permitted provided the original work is properly cited http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Janati Esfahani, Azam
Mahdavi, Seied Rabi
Shiran, Mohammad Bagher
Khoei, Samideh
The Role of Radiofrequency Hyperthermia in The Radiosensitization of A Human Prostate Cancer Cell Line
title The Role of Radiofrequency Hyperthermia in The Radiosensitization of A Human Prostate Cancer Cell Line
title_full The Role of Radiofrequency Hyperthermia in The Radiosensitization of A Human Prostate Cancer Cell Line
title_fullStr The Role of Radiofrequency Hyperthermia in The Radiosensitization of A Human Prostate Cancer Cell Line
title_full_unstemmed The Role of Radiofrequency Hyperthermia in The Radiosensitization of A Human Prostate Cancer Cell Line
title_short The Role of Radiofrequency Hyperthermia in The Radiosensitization of A Human Prostate Cancer Cell Line
title_sort role of radiofrequency hyperthermia in the radiosensitization of a human prostate cancer cell line
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5448328/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28580312
http://dx.doi.org/10.22074/cellj.2017.4460
work_keys_str_mv AT janatiesfahaniazam theroleofradiofrequencyhyperthermiaintheradiosensitizationofahumanprostatecancercellline
AT mahdaviseiedrabi theroleofradiofrequencyhyperthermiaintheradiosensitizationofahumanprostatecancercellline
AT shiranmohammadbagher theroleofradiofrequencyhyperthermiaintheradiosensitizationofahumanprostatecancercellline
AT khoeisamideh theroleofradiofrequencyhyperthermiaintheradiosensitizationofahumanprostatecancercellline
AT janatiesfahaniazam roleofradiofrequencyhyperthermiaintheradiosensitizationofahumanprostatecancercellline
AT mahdaviseiedrabi roleofradiofrequencyhyperthermiaintheradiosensitizationofahumanprostatecancercellline
AT shiranmohammadbagher roleofradiofrequencyhyperthermiaintheradiosensitizationofahumanprostatecancercellline
AT khoeisamideh roleofradiofrequencyhyperthermiaintheradiosensitizationofahumanprostatecancercellline