Cargando…

Recommendations for the use of oral treprostinil in clinical practice: a Delphi consensus project pulmonary circulation

Oral treprostinil was recently labeled for treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension. Similar to the period immediately after parenteral treprostinil was approved, there is a significant knowledge gap for practicing physicians who might prescribe oral treprostinil. Despite its oral route of deliv...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rahaghi, Franck F., Feldman, Jeremy P., Allen, Roblee P., Tapson, Victor, Safdar, Zeenat, Balasubramanian, Vijay P., Shapiro, Shelley, Mathier, Michael A., Elwing, Jean M., Chakinala, Murali M., White, R. James
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5448528/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28680576
http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/690109
_version_ 1783239571300941824
author Rahaghi, Franck F.
Feldman, Jeremy P.
Allen, Roblee P.
Tapson, Victor
Safdar, Zeenat
Balasubramanian, Vijay P.
Shapiro, Shelley
Mathier, Michael A.
Elwing, Jean M.
Chakinala, Murali M.
White, R. James
author_facet Rahaghi, Franck F.
Feldman, Jeremy P.
Allen, Roblee P.
Tapson, Victor
Safdar, Zeenat
Balasubramanian, Vijay P.
Shapiro, Shelley
Mathier, Michael A.
Elwing, Jean M.
Chakinala, Murali M.
White, R. James
author_sort Rahaghi, Franck F.
collection PubMed
description Oral treprostinil was recently labeled for treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension. Similar to the period immediately after parenteral treprostinil was approved, there is a significant knowledge gap for practicing physicians who might prescribe oral treprostinil. Despite its oral route of delivery, use of the drug is challenging because of the requirement for careful titration and management of drug-related adverse effects. We aimed to create a consensus document combining available evidence with expert opinion to provide guidance for use of oral treprostinil. Following a methodology commonly used in business and social sciences (the ‘Delphi Process’), two investigators from the oral treprostinil (Freedom) studies created a series of statements based on available evidence and the package insert. The set of ‘best practice’ statements was circulated to nine other Freedom trial investigators. Their comments were incorporated into the document as new line items for further vote and comment. The subsequent document was put to vote line by line (scale of −5 to +5) and a final statement was drafted. Consensus recommendations include initial therapy with 0.125 mg for treatment naÿ patients, three times daily dosing, aggressive use of antidiarrheal medication, and a strong preference for use of the drug in combination with other approved PAH therapies. This process was particularly valuable in providing guidance for the management of adverse events (where essentially no data is available). The Delphi process was useful to codify investigator experience and subsequently develop investigator consensus about practical issues for physicians who may wish to prescribe oral treprostinil.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5448528
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54485282017-06-08 Recommendations for the use of oral treprostinil in clinical practice: a Delphi consensus project pulmonary circulation Rahaghi, Franck F. Feldman, Jeremy P. Allen, Roblee P. Tapson, Victor Safdar, Zeenat Balasubramanian, Vijay P. Shapiro, Shelley Mathier, Michael A. Elwing, Jean M. Chakinala, Murali M. White, R. James Pulm Circ Research Articles Oral treprostinil was recently labeled for treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension. Similar to the period immediately after parenteral treprostinil was approved, there is a significant knowledge gap for practicing physicians who might prescribe oral treprostinil. Despite its oral route of delivery, use of the drug is challenging because of the requirement for careful titration and management of drug-related adverse effects. We aimed to create a consensus document combining available evidence with expert opinion to provide guidance for use of oral treprostinil. Following a methodology commonly used in business and social sciences (the ‘Delphi Process’), two investigators from the oral treprostinil (Freedom) studies created a series of statements based on available evidence and the package insert. The set of ‘best practice’ statements was circulated to nine other Freedom trial investigators. Their comments were incorporated into the document as new line items for further vote and comment. The subsequent document was put to vote line by line (scale of −5 to +5) and a final statement was drafted. Consensus recommendations include initial therapy with 0.125 mg for treatment naÿ patients, three times daily dosing, aggressive use of antidiarrheal medication, and a strong preference for use of the drug in combination with other approved PAH therapies. This process was particularly valuable in providing guidance for the management of adverse events (where essentially no data is available). The Delphi process was useful to codify investigator experience and subsequently develop investigator consensus about practical issues for physicians who may wish to prescribe oral treprostinil. SAGE Publications 2017-03-21 /pmc/articles/PMC5448528/ /pubmed/28680576 http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/690109 Text en © 2017 by Pulmonary Vascular Research Institute http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Research Articles
Rahaghi, Franck F.
Feldman, Jeremy P.
Allen, Roblee P.
Tapson, Victor
Safdar, Zeenat
Balasubramanian, Vijay P.
Shapiro, Shelley
Mathier, Michael A.
Elwing, Jean M.
Chakinala, Murali M.
White, R. James
Recommendations for the use of oral treprostinil in clinical practice: a Delphi consensus project pulmonary circulation
title Recommendations for the use of oral treprostinil in clinical practice: a Delphi consensus project pulmonary circulation
title_full Recommendations for the use of oral treprostinil in clinical practice: a Delphi consensus project pulmonary circulation
title_fullStr Recommendations for the use of oral treprostinil in clinical practice: a Delphi consensus project pulmonary circulation
title_full_unstemmed Recommendations for the use of oral treprostinil in clinical practice: a Delphi consensus project pulmonary circulation
title_short Recommendations for the use of oral treprostinil in clinical practice: a Delphi consensus project pulmonary circulation
title_sort recommendations for the use of oral treprostinil in clinical practice: a delphi consensus project pulmonary circulation
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5448528/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28680576
http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/690109
work_keys_str_mv AT rahaghifranckf recommendationsfortheuseoforaltreprostinilinclinicalpracticeadelphiconsensusprojectpulmonarycirculation
AT feldmanjeremyp recommendationsfortheuseoforaltreprostinilinclinicalpracticeadelphiconsensusprojectpulmonarycirculation
AT allenrobleep recommendationsfortheuseoforaltreprostinilinclinicalpracticeadelphiconsensusprojectpulmonarycirculation
AT tapsonvictor recommendationsfortheuseoforaltreprostinilinclinicalpracticeadelphiconsensusprojectpulmonarycirculation
AT safdarzeenat recommendationsfortheuseoforaltreprostinilinclinicalpracticeadelphiconsensusprojectpulmonarycirculation
AT balasubramanianvijayp recommendationsfortheuseoforaltreprostinilinclinicalpracticeadelphiconsensusprojectpulmonarycirculation
AT shapiroshelley recommendationsfortheuseoforaltreprostinilinclinicalpracticeadelphiconsensusprojectpulmonarycirculation
AT mathiermichaela recommendationsfortheuseoforaltreprostinilinclinicalpracticeadelphiconsensusprojectpulmonarycirculation
AT elwingjeanm recommendationsfortheuseoforaltreprostinilinclinicalpracticeadelphiconsensusprojectpulmonarycirculation
AT chakinalamuralim recommendationsfortheuseoforaltreprostinilinclinicalpracticeadelphiconsensusprojectpulmonarycirculation
AT whiterjames recommendationsfortheuseoforaltreprostinilinclinicalpracticeadelphiconsensusprojectpulmonarycirculation