Cargando…

Quality evaluation of investigator‐initiated trials using post‐approval cancer drugs in Japan

Investigator‐initiated trials (IIT) are important aspects of medical research and have contributed substantially to modern oncology. IIT using post‐approval drugs have been conducted by domestic institutions in Japan. Data from the present study were obtained by all IIT registered clinical trials fo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kondo, Shunsuke, Hosoi, Hiroko, Itahashi, Kota, Hashimoto, Jun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5448621/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28266163
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cas.13223
_version_ 1783239590352519168
author Kondo, Shunsuke
Hosoi, Hiroko
Itahashi, Kota
Hashimoto, Jun
author_facet Kondo, Shunsuke
Hosoi, Hiroko
Itahashi, Kota
Hashimoto, Jun
author_sort Kondo, Shunsuke
collection PubMed
description Investigator‐initiated trials (IIT) are important aspects of medical research and have contributed substantially to modern oncology. IIT using post‐approval drugs have been conducted by domestic institutions in Japan. Data from the present study were obtained by all IIT registered clinical trials for five cancers (lung, colorectal cancer, gastric cancer, liver cancer, and breast cancer) using drugs approved from 1999 to 2009 in Japan. Kaplan–Meier method, analysis of variance (anova), and Kruskal–Wallis test were used to estimate time to enrolment completion (TTEC) and time to enrolment per patient (TTEP). Of 1222 trials eligible for analysis, 465 trials (38%) completed enrolment to the studies, and 203 trials (17%) published results. In the distribution according to trial phase, 98 (8%) were phase I, 1058 (87%) were phase I/II + II, and 66 (5%) were phase II/III + III. Accrual achievement and publication rates were higher in late‐phase than in early‐phase trials. Median TTEC was 1387 days (95% confidence interval [CI], 1302–1472). Median TTEP was 38.5 days (95% CI, 34.5–42.5). The median TTEC and TTEP were significantly different in each trial phase (P < 0.01), funding source (P < 0.01), and publication status (median TTEC published trials versus unpublished trial; 720 days vs 1672 days, median TTEP; 16 days vs 55.8 days; P < 0.001). Many IIT using approved cancer drugs have been conducted; however, the quality of the clinical trials was low in terms of accrual achievement, publication rate, and time to publication of trial results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5448621
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54486212017-06-01 Quality evaluation of investigator‐initiated trials using post‐approval cancer drugs in Japan Kondo, Shunsuke Hosoi, Hiroko Itahashi, Kota Hashimoto, Jun Cancer Sci Original Articles Investigator‐initiated trials (IIT) are important aspects of medical research and have contributed substantially to modern oncology. IIT using post‐approval drugs have been conducted by domestic institutions in Japan. Data from the present study were obtained by all IIT registered clinical trials for five cancers (lung, colorectal cancer, gastric cancer, liver cancer, and breast cancer) using drugs approved from 1999 to 2009 in Japan. Kaplan–Meier method, analysis of variance (anova), and Kruskal–Wallis test were used to estimate time to enrolment completion (TTEC) and time to enrolment per patient (TTEP). Of 1222 trials eligible for analysis, 465 trials (38%) completed enrolment to the studies, and 203 trials (17%) published results. In the distribution according to trial phase, 98 (8%) were phase I, 1058 (87%) were phase I/II + II, and 66 (5%) were phase II/III + III. Accrual achievement and publication rates were higher in late‐phase than in early‐phase trials. Median TTEC was 1387 days (95% confidence interval [CI], 1302–1472). Median TTEP was 38.5 days (95% CI, 34.5–42.5). The median TTEC and TTEP were significantly different in each trial phase (P < 0.01), funding source (P < 0.01), and publication status (median TTEC published trials versus unpublished trial; 720 days vs 1672 days, median TTEP; 16 days vs 55.8 days; P < 0.001). Many IIT using approved cancer drugs have been conducted; however, the quality of the clinical trials was low in terms of accrual achievement, publication rate, and time to publication of trial results. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-05-16 2017-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5448621/ /pubmed/28266163 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cas.13223 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Cancer Science published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japanese Cancer Association. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Kondo, Shunsuke
Hosoi, Hiroko
Itahashi, Kota
Hashimoto, Jun
Quality evaluation of investigator‐initiated trials using post‐approval cancer drugs in Japan
title Quality evaluation of investigator‐initiated trials using post‐approval cancer drugs in Japan
title_full Quality evaluation of investigator‐initiated trials using post‐approval cancer drugs in Japan
title_fullStr Quality evaluation of investigator‐initiated trials using post‐approval cancer drugs in Japan
title_full_unstemmed Quality evaluation of investigator‐initiated trials using post‐approval cancer drugs in Japan
title_short Quality evaluation of investigator‐initiated trials using post‐approval cancer drugs in Japan
title_sort quality evaluation of investigator‐initiated trials using post‐approval cancer drugs in japan
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5448621/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28266163
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cas.13223
work_keys_str_mv AT kondoshunsuke qualityevaluationofinvestigatorinitiatedtrialsusingpostapprovalcancerdrugsinjapan
AT hosoihiroko qualityevaluationofinvestigatorinitiatedtrialsusingpostapprovalcancerdrugsinjapan
AT itahashikota qualityevaluationofinvestigatorinitiatedtrialsusingpostapprovalcancerdrugsinjapan
AT hashimotojun qualityevaluationofinvestigatorinitiatedtrialsusingpostapprovalcancerdrugsinjapan