Cargando…

Cellulose Isolation Methodology for NMR Analysis of Cellulose Ultrastructure

In order to obtain accurate information about the ultrastructure of cellulose from native biomass by (13)C cross polarization magic angle spinning (CP/MAS) NMR spectroscopy the cellulose component must be isolated due to overlapping resonances from both lignin and hemicellulose. Typically, cellulose...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Foston, Marcus B., Hubbell, Chistopher A., Ragauskas, Art J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5448851/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28824119
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma4111985
_version_ 1783239638649929728
author Foston, Marcus B.
Hubbell, Chistopher A.
Ragauskas, Art J.
author_facet Foston, Marcus B.
Hubbell, Chistopher A.
Ragauskas, Art J.
author_sort Foston, Marcus B.
collection PubMed
description In order to obtain accurate information about the ultrastructure of cellulose from native biomass by (13)C cross polarization magic angle spinning (CP/MAS) NMR spectroscopy the cellulose component must be isolated due to overlapping resonances from both lignin and hemicellulose. Typically, cellulose isolation has been achieved via holocellulose pulping to remove lignin followed by an acid hydrolysis procedure to remove the hemicellulose components. Using (13)C CP/MAS NMR and non-linear line-fitting of the cellulose C(4) region, it was observed that the standard acid hydrolysis procedure caused an apparent increase in crystallinity of ~10% or less on the cellulose isolated from Populus holocellulose. We have examined the effect of the cellulose isolation method, particularly the acid treatment time for hemicellulose removal, on cellulose ultrastructural characteristics by studying these effects on cotton, microcrystalline cellulose (MCC) and holocellulose pulped Populus. (13)C CP/MAS NMR of MCC indicated that holocellulose pulping and acid hydrolysis has little effect on the crystalline ultrastructural components of cellulose. Although any chemical method to isolate cellulose from native biomass will invariably alter substrate characteristics, especially those related to regions accessible to solvents, we found those changes to be minimal and consistent in samples of typical crystallinity and lignin/hemicellulose content. Based on the rate of the hemicellulose removal, as determined by HPLC-carbohydrate analysis and magnitude of cellulose ultrastructural alteration, the most suitable cellulose isolation methodology utilizes a treatment of 2.5 M HCl at 100 °C for a standard residence time between 1.5 and 4 h. However, for the most accurate crystallinity results this residence time should be determined empirically for a particular sample.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5448851
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54488512017-07-28 Cellulose Isolation Methodology for NMR Analysis of Cellulose Ultrastructure Foston, Marcus B. Hubbell, Chistopher A. Ragauskas, Art J. Materials (Basel) Article In order to obtain accurate information about the ultrastructure of cellulose from native biomass by (13)C cross polarization magic angle spinning (CP/MAS) NMR spectroscopy the cellulose component must be isolated due to overlapping resonances from both lignin and hemicellulose. Typically, cellulose isolation has been achieved via holocellulose pulping to remove lignin followed by an acid hydrolysis procedure to remove the hemicellulose components. Using (13)C CP/MAS NMR and non-linear line-fitting of the cellulose C(4) region, it was observed that the standard acid hydrolysis procedure caused an apparent increase in crystallinity of ~10% or less on the cellulose isolated from Populus holocellulose. We have examined the effect of the cellulose isolation method, particularly the acid treatment time for hemicellulose removal, on cellulose ultrastructural characteristics by studying these effects on cotton, microcrystalline cellulose (MCC) and holocellulose pulped Populus. (13)C CP/MAS NMR of MCC indicated that holocellulose pulping and acid hydrolysis has little effect on the crystalline ultrastructural components of cellulose. Although any chemical method to isolate cellulose from native biomass will invariably alter substrate characteristics, especially those related to regions accessible to solvents, we found those changes to be minimal and consistent in samples of typical crystallinity and lignin/hemicellulose content. Based on the rate of the hemicellulose removal, as determined by HPLC-carbohydrate analysis and magnitude of cellulose ultrastructural alteration, the most suitable cellulose isolation methodology utilizes a treatment of 2.5 M HCl at 100 °C for a standard residence time between 1.5 and 4 h. However, for the most accurate crystallinity results this residence time should be determined empirically for a particular sample. MDPI 2011-11-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5448851/ /pubmed/28824119 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma4111985 Text en © 2011 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Foston, Marcus B.
Hubbell, Chistopher A.
Ragauskas, Art J.
Cellulose Isolation Methodology for NMR Analysis of Cellulose Ultrastructure
title Cellulose Isolation Methodology for NMR Analysis of Cellulose Ultrastructure
title_full Cellulose Isolation Methodology for NMR Analysis of Cellulose Ultrastructure
title_fullStr Cellulose Isolation Methodology for NMR Analysis of Cellulose Ultrastructure
title_full_unstemmed Cellulose Isolation Methodology for NMR Analysis of Cellulose Ultrastructure
title_short Cellulose Isolation Methodology for NMR Analysis of Cellulose Ultrastructure
title_sort cellulose isolation methodology for nmr analysis of cellulose ultrastructure
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5448851/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28824119
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma4111985
work_keys_str_mv AT fostonmarcusb celluloseisolationmethodologyfornmranalysisofcelluloseultrastructure
AT hubbellchistophera celluloseisolationmethodologyfornmranalysisofcelluloseultrastructure
AT ragauskasartj celluloseisolationmethodologyfornmranalysisofcelluloseultrastructure