Cargando…

Comparison of Copper Scavenging Capacity between Two Different Red Mud Types

A batch experiment was conducted to compare the Cu scavenging capacity between two different red mud types: the first one was a highly basic red mud derived from a combined sintering and Bayer process, and the second one was a seawater-neutralized red mud derived from the Bayer process. The first re...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ma, Yingqun, Si, Chunhua, Lin, Chuxia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5449024/
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma5091708
_version_ 1783239683670540288
author Ma, Yingqun
Si, Chunhua
Lin, Chuxia
author_facet Ma, Yingqun
Si, Chunhua
Lin, Chuxia
author_sort Ma, Yingqun
collection PubMed
description A batch experiment was conducted to compare the Cu scavenging capacity between two different red mud types: the first one was a highly basic red mud derived from a combined sintering and Bayer process, and the second one was a seawater-neutralized red mud derived from the Bayer process. The first red mud contained substantial amounts of CaCO(3), which, in combination with the high OH(−) activity, favored the immobilization of water-borne Cu through massive formation of atacamite. In comparison, the seawater-neutralized red mud had a lower pH and was dominated by boehmite, which was likely to play a significant role in Cu adsorption. Overall, it appears that Cu was more tightly retained by the CaCO(3)-dominated red mud than the boehmite-dominated red mud. It is concluded that the heterogeneity of red mud has marked influences on its capacity to immobilize water-borne Cu and maintain the long-term stability of the immobilized Cu species. The research findings obtained from this study have implications for the development of Cu immobilization technology by using appropriate waste materials generated from the aluminium industry.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5449024
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54490242017-07-28 Comparison of Copper Scavenging Capacity between Two Different Red Mud Types Ma, Yingqun Si, Chunhua Lin, Chuxia Materials (Basel) Article A batch experiment was conducted to compare the Cu scavenging capacity between two different red mud types: the first one was a highly basic red mud derived from a combined sintering and Bayer process, and the second one was a seawater-neutralized red mud derived from the Bayer process. The first red mud contained substantial amounts of CaCO(3), which, in combination with the high OH(−) activity, favored the immobilization of water-borne Cu through massive formation of atacamite. In comparison, the seawater-neutralized red mud had a lower pH and was dominated by boehmite, which was likely to play a significant role in Cu adsorption. Overall, it appears that Cu was more tightly retained by the CaCO(3)-dominated red mud than the boehmite-dominated red mud. It is concluded that the heterogeneity of red mud has marked influences on its capacity to immobilize water-borne Cu and maintain the long-term stability of the immobilized Cu species. The research findings obtained from this study have implications for the development of Cu immobilization technology by using appropriate waste materials generated from the aluminium industry. MDPI 2012-09-24 /pmc/articles/PMC5449024/ http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma5091708 Text en © 2012 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Ma, Yingqun
Si, Chunhua
Lin, Chuxia
Comparison of Copper Scavenging Capacity between Two Different Red Mud Types
title Comparison of Copper Scavenging Capacity between Two Different Red Mud Types
title_full Comparison of Copper Scavenging Capacity between Two Different Red Mud Types
title_fullStr Comparison of Copper Scavenging Capacity between Two Different Red Mud Types
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Copper Scavenging Capacity between Two Different Red Mud Types
title_short Comparison of Copper Scavenging Capacity between Two Different Red Mud Types
title_sort comparison of copper scavenging capacity between two different red mud types
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5449024/
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma5091708
work_keys_str_mv AT mayingqun comparisonofcopperscavengingcapacitybetweentwodifferentredmudtypes
AT sichunhua comparisonofcopperscavengingcapacitybetweentwodifferentredmudtypes
AT linchuxia comparisonofcopperscavengingcapacitybetweentwodifferentredmudtypes