Cargando…

Effects of chemopreventive agents on the incidence of recurrent colorectal adenomas: a systematic review with network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND: Protective effects of several chemopreventive agents (CPAs) against colorectal adenomas have been well documented in randomized controlled trials (RCTs); however, there is uncertainty regarding which agents are the most effective. METHODS: We searched for RCTs published up until Septembe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Veettil, Sajesh K, Teerawattanapong, Nattawat, Ching, Siew Mooi, Lim, Kean Ghee, Saokaew, Surasak, Phisalprapa, Pochamana, Chaiyakunapruk, Nathorn
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5449107/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28579807
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OTT.S127335
_version_ 1783239710539251712
author Veettil, Sajesh K
Teerawattanapong, Nattawat
Ching, Siew Mooi
Lim, Kean Ghee
Saokaew, Surasak
Phisalprapa, Pochamana
Chaiyakunapruk, Nathorn
author_facet Veettil, Sajesh K
Teerawattanapong, Nattawat
Ching, Siew Mooi
Lim, Kean Ghee
Saokaew, Surasak
Phisalprapa, Pochamana
Chaiyakunapruk, Nathorn
author_sort Veettil, Sajesh K
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Protective effects of several chemopreventive agents (CPAs) against colorectal adenomas have been well documented in randomized controlled trials (RCTs); however, there is uncertainty regarding which agents are the most effective. METHODS: We searched for RCTs published up until September 2016. Retrieved trials were evaluated using risk of bias. We performed both pairwise analysis and network meta-analysis (NMA) of RCTs to compare the effects of CPAs on the recurrence of colorectal adenomas (primary outcome). Using NMA, we ranked CPAs based on efficacy. RESULTS: We identified 20 eligible RCTs enrolling 12,625 participants with a history of colorectal cancer or adenomas who were randomly assigned to receive either a placebo or one of 12 interventions. NMA using all trials demonstrated that celecoxib 800 mg/day (relative risk [RR] 0.61, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.45–0.83), celecoxib 400 mg/day (RR 0.70, 95% CI 0.55–0.87), low-dose aspirin (RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.59–0.96) and calcium (RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.69–0.96) were significantly associated with a reduction in the recurrence of any adenomas. NMA results were consistent with those from pairwise meta-analysis. The evidence indicated a high (celecoxib), moderate (low-dose aspirin) and low (calcium) Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) quality. NMA ranking showed that celecoxib 800 mg/day and celecoxib 400 mg/day were the best CPAs, followed by low-dose aspirin and calcium. Considering advanced adenoma recurrence, only celecoxib 800 mg/day and celecoxib 400 mg/day were demonstrated to have a protective effect (RR 0.37, 95% CI 0.27–0.52 vs RR 0.48, 95% CI 0.38–0.60, respectively). CONCLUSION: The available evidence from NMA suggests that celecoxib is more effective in reducing the risk of recurrence of colorectal adenomas, followed by low-dose aspirin and calcium. Since cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitors (eg, celecoxib) are associated with important cardiovascular events and gastrointestinal harms, more attention is warranted toward CPAs with a favorable benefit-to-risk ratio, such as low-dose aspirin and calcium.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5449107
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54491072017-06-02 Effects of chemopreventive agents on the incidence of recurrent colorectal adenomas: a systematic review with network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials Veettil, Sajesh K Teerawattanapong, Nattawat Ching, Siew Mooi Lim, Kean Ghee Saokaew, Surasak Phisalprapa, Pochamana Chaiyakunapruk, Nathorn Onco Targets Ther Original Research BACKGROUND: Protective effects of several chemopreventive agents (CPAs) against colorectal adenomas have been well documented in randomized controlled trials (RCTs); however, there is uncertainty regarding which agents are the most effective. METHODS: We searched for RCTs published up until September 2016. Retrieved trials were evaluated using risk of bias. We performed both pairwise analysis and network meta-analysis (NMA) of RCTs to compare the effects of CPAs on the recurrence of colorectal adenomas (primary outcome). Using NMA, we ranked CPAs based on efficacy. RESULTS: We identified 20 eligible RCTs enrolling 12,625 participants with a history of colorectal cancer or adenomas who were randomly assigned to receive either a placebo or one of 12 interventions. NMA using all trials demonstrated that celecoxib 800 mg/day (relative risk [RR] 0.61, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.45–0.83), celecoxib 400 mg/day (RR 0.70, 95% CI 0.55–0.87), low-dose aspirin (RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.59–0.96) and calcium (RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.69–0.96) were significantly associated with a reduction in the recurrence of any adenomas. NMA results were consistent with those from pairwise meta-analysis. The evidence indicated a high (celecoxib), moderate (low-dose aspirin) and low (calcium) Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) quality. NMA ranking showed that celecoxib 800 mg/day and celecoxib 400 mg/day were the best CPAs, followed by low-dose aspirin and calcium. Considering advanced adenoma recurrence, only celecoxib 800 mg/day and celecoxib 400 mg/day were demonstrated to have a protective effect (RR 0.37, 95% CI 0.27–0.52 vs RR 0.48, 95% CI 0.38–0.60, respectively). CONCLUSION: The available evidence from NMA suggests that celecoxib is more effective in reducing the risk of recurrence of colorectal adenomas, followed by low-dose aspirin and calcium. Since cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitors (eg, celecoxib) are associated with important cardiovascular events and gastrointestinal harms, more attention is warranted toward CPAs with a favorable benefit-to-risk ratio, such as low-dose aspirin and calcium. Dove Medical Press 2017-05-23 /pmc/articles/PMC5449107/ /pubmed/28579807 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OTT.S127335 Text en © 2017 Veettil et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Veettil, Sajesh K
Teerawattanapong, Nattawat
Ching, Siew Mooi
Lim, Kean Ghee
Saokaew, Surasak
Phisalprapa, Pochamana
Chaiyakunapruk, Nathorn
Effects of chemopreventive agents on the incidence of recurrent colorectal adenomas: a systematic review with network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title Effects of chemopreventive agents on the incidence of recurrent colorectal adenomas: a systematic review with network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_full Effects of chemopreventive agents on the incidence of recurrent colorectal adenomas: a systematic review with network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_fullStr Effects of chemopreventive agents on the incidence of recurrent colorectal adenomas: a systematic review with network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_full_unstemmed Effects of chemopreventive agents on the incidence of recurrent colorectal adenomas: a systematic review with network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_short Effects of chemopreventive agents on the incidence of recurrent colorectal adenomas: a systematic review with network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_sort effects of chemopreventive agents on the incidence of recurrent colorectal adenomas: a systematic review with network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5449107/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28579807
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OTT.S127335
work_keys_str_mv AT veettilsajeshk effectsofchemopreventiveagentsontheincidenceofrecurrentcolorectaladenomasasystematicreviewwithnetworkmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT teerawattanapongnattawat effectsofchemopreventiveagentsontheincidenceofrecurrentcolorectaladenomasasystematicreviewwithnetworkmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT chingsiewmooi effectsofchemopreventiveagentsontheincidenceofrecurrentcolorectaladenomasasystematicreviewwithnetworkmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT limkeanghee effectsofchemopreventiveagentsontheincidenceofrecurrentcolorectaladenomasasystematicreviewwithnetworkmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT saokaewsurasak effectsofchemopreventiveagentsontheincidenceofrecurrentcolorectaladenomasasystematicreviewwithnetworkmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT phisalprapapochamana effectsofchemopreventiveagentsontheincidenceofrecurrentcolorectaladenomasasystematicreviewwithnetworkmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT chaiyakunapruknathorn effectsofchemopreventiveagentsontheincidenceofrecurrentcolorectaladenomasasystematicreviewwithnetworkmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials