Cargando…

Quantitative sensory testing measures individual pain responses in emergency department patients

BACKGROUND: Refining and individualizing treatment of acute pain in the emergency department (ED) is a high priority, given that painful complaints are the most common reasons for ED visits. Few tools exist to objectively measure pain perception in the ED setting. We speculated that variation in per...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Duffy, Kevin J, Flickinger, Katharyn L, Kristan, Jeffrey T, Repine, Melissa J, Gianforcaro, Alexandro, Hasley, Rebecca B, Feroz, Saad, Rupp, Jessica M, Al-Baghli, Jumana, Pacella, Maria L, Suffoletto, Brian P, Callaway, Clifton W
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5449126/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28579822
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S132485
_version_ 1783239718714998784
author Duffy, Kevin J
Flickinger, Katharyn L
Kristan, Jeffrey T
Repine, Melissa J
Gianforcaro, Alexandro
Hasley, Rebecca B
Feroz, Saad
Rupp, Jessica M
Al-Baghli, Jumana
Pacella, Maria L
Suffoletto, Brian P
Callaway, Clifton W
author_facet Duffy, Kevin J
Flickinger, Katharyn L
Kristan, Jeffrey T
Repine, Melissa J
Gianforcaro, Alexandro
Hasley, Rebecca B
Feroz, Saad
Rupp, Jessica M
Al-Baghli, Jumana
Pacella, Maria L
Suffoletto, Brian P
Callaway, Clifton W
author_sort Duffy, Kevin J
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Refining and individualizing treatment of acute pain in the emergency department (ED) is a high priority, given that painful complaints are the most common reasons for ED visits. Few tools exist to objectively measure pain perception in the ED setting. We speculated that variation in perception of fixed painful stimuli would explain individual variation in reported pain and response to treatment among ED patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In three studies, we 1) describe performance characteristics of brief quantitative sensory testing (QST) in 50 healthy volunteers, 2) test effects of 10 mg oxycodone versus placebo on QST measures in 18 healthy volunteers, and 3) measure interindividual differences in nociception and treatment responses in 198 ED patients with a painful complaint during ED treatment. QST measures adapted for use in the ED included pressure sensation threshold, pressure pain threshold (PPT), pressure pain response (PPR), and cold pain tolerance (CPT) tests. RESULTS: First, all QST measures had high inter-rater reliability and test–retest reproducibility. Second, 10 mg oxycodone reduced PPR, increased PPT, and prolonged CPT. Third, baseline PPT and PPR revealed hyperalgesia in 31 (16%) ED subjects relative to healthy volunteers. In 173 (88%) ED subjects who completed repeat testing 30 minutes after pain treatment, PPT increased and PPR decreased (Cohen’s d(z) 0.10–0.19). Verbal pain scores (0–10) for the ED complaint decreased by 2.2 (95% confidence intervals [CI]: 1.9, 2.6) (Cohen’s d(z) 0.97) but did not covary with the changes in PPT and PPR (r=0.05–0.13). Treatment effects were greatest in ED subjects with a history of treatment for anxiety or depression (Cohen’s d(z) 0.26–0.43) or with baseline hyperalgesia (Cohen’s d(z) 0.40–0.88). CONCLUSION: QST reveals individual differences in perception of fixed painful stimuli in ED patients, including hyperalgesia. Subgroups of ED patients with hyperalgesia and psychiatric history report larger treatment effects on ED pain and QST measures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5449126
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54491262017-06-02 Quantitative sensory testing measures individual pain responses in emergency department patients Duffy, Kevin J Flickinger, Katharyn L Kristan, Jeffrey T Repine, Melissa J Gianforcaro, Alexandro Hasley, Rebecca B Feroz, Saad Rupp, Jessica M Al-Baghli, Jumana Pacella, Maria L Suffoletto, Brian P Callaway, Clifton W J Pain Res Original Research BACKGROUND: Refining and individualizing treatment of acute pain in the emergency department (ED) is a high priority, given that painful complaints are the most common reasons for ED visits. Few tools exist to objectively measure pain perception in the ED setting. We speculated that variation in perception of fixed painful stimuli would explain individual variation in reported pain and response to treatment among ED patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In three studies, we 1) describe performance characteristics of brief quantitative sensory testing (QST) in 50 healthy volunteers, 2) test effects of 10 mg oxycodone versus placebo on QST measures in 18 healthy volunteers, and 3) measure interindividual differences in nociception and treatment responses in 198 ED patients with a painful complaint during ED treatment. QST measures adapted for use in the ED included pressure sensation threshold, pressure pain threshold (PPT), pressure pain response (PPR), and cold pain tolerance (CPT) tests. RESULTS: First, all QST measures had high inter-rater reliability and test–retest reproducibility. Second, 10 mg oxycodone reduced PPR, increased PPT, and prolonged CPT. Third, baseline PPT and PPR revealed hyperalgesia in 31 (16%) ED subjects relative to healthy volunteers. In 173 (88%) ED subjects who completed repeat testing 30 minutes after pain treatment, PPT increased and PPR decreased (Cohen’s d(z) 0.10–0.19). Verbal pain scores (0–10) for the ED complaint decreased by 2.2 (95% confidence intervals [CI]: 1.9, 2.6) (Cohen’s d(z) 0.97) but did not covary with the changes in PPT and PPR (r=0.05–0.13). Treatment effects were greatest in ED subjects with a history of treatment for anxiety or depression (Cohen’s d(z) 0.26–0.43) or with baseline hyperalgesia (Cohen’s d(z) 0.40–0.88). CONCLUSION: QST reveals individual differences in perception of fixed painful stimuli in ED patients, including hyperalgesia. Subgroups of ED patients with hyperalgesia and psychiatric history report larger treatment effects on ED pain and QST measures. Dove Medical Press 2017-05-24 /pmc/articles/PMC5449126/ /pubmed/28579822 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S132485 Text en © 2017 Duffy et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Duffy, Kevin J
Flickinger, Katharyn L
Kristan, Jeffrey T
Repine, Melissa J
Gianforcaro, Alexandro
Hasley, Rebecca B
Feroz, Saad
Rupp, Jessica M
Al-Baghli, Jumana
Pacella, Maria L
Suffoletto, Brian P
Callaway, Clifton W
Quantitative sensory testing measures individual pain responses in emergency department patients
title Quantitative sensory testing measures individual pain responses in emergency department patients
title_full Quantitative sensory testing measures individual pain responses in emergency department patients
title_fullStr Quantitative sensory testing measures individual pain responses in emergency department patients
title_full_unstemmed Quantitative sensory testing measures individual pain responses in emergency department patients
title_short Quantitative sensory testing measures individual pain responses in emergency department patients
title_sort quantitative sensory testing measures individual pain responses in emergency department patients
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5449126/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28579822
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S132485
work_keys_str_mv AT duffykevinj quantitativesensorytestingmeasuresindividualpainresponsesinemergencydepartmentpatients
AT flickingerkatharynl quantitativesensorytestingmeasuresindividualpainresponsesinemergencydepartmentpatients
AT kristanjeffreyt quantitativesensorytestingmeasuresindividualpainresponsesinemergencydepartmentpatients
AT repinemelissaj quantitativesensorytestingmeasuresindividualpainresponsesinemergencydepartmentpatients
AT gianforcaroalexandro quantitativesensorytestingmeasuresindividualpainresponsesinemergencydepartmentpatients
AT hasleyrebeccab quantitativesensorytestingmeasuresindividualpainresponsesinemergencydepartmentpatients
AT ferozsaad quantitativesensorytestingmeasuresindividualpainresponsesinemergencydepartmentpatients
AT ruppjessicam quantitativesensorytestingmeasuresindividualpainresponsesinemergencydepartmentpatients
AT albaghlijumana quantitativesensorytestingmeasuresindividualpainresponsesinemergencydepartmentpatients
AT pacellamarial quantitativesensorytestingmeasuresindividualpainresponsesinemergencydepartmentpatients
AT suffolettobrianp quantitativesensorytestingmeasuresindividualpainresponsesinemergencydepartmentpatients
AT callawaycliftonw quantitativesensorytestingmeasuresindividualpainresponsesinemergencydepartmentpatients