Cargando…
Quantitative sensory testing measures individual pain responses in emergency department patients
BACKGROUND: Refining and individualizing treatment of acute pain in the emergency department (ED) is a high priority, given that painful complaints are the most common reasons for ED visits. Few tools exist to objectively measure pain perception in the ED setting. We speculated that variation in per...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5449126/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28579822 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S132485 |
_version_ | 1783239718714998784 |
---|---|
author | Duffy, Kevin J Flickinger, Katharyn L Kristan, Jeffrey T Repine, Melissa J Gianforcaro, Alexandro Hasley, Rebecca B Feroz, Saad Rupp, Jessica M Al-Baghli, Jumana Pacella, Maria L Suffoletto, Brian P Callaway, Clifton W |
author_facet | Duffy, Kevin J Flickinger, Katharyn L Kristan, Jeffrey T Repine, Melissa J Gianforcaro, Alexandro Hasley, Rebecca B Feroz, Saad Rupp, Jessica M Al-Baghli, Jumana Pacella, Maria L Suffoletto, Brian P Callaway, Clifton W |
author_sort | Duffy, Kevin J |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Refining and individualizing treatment of acute pain in the emergency department (ED) is a high priority, given that painful complaints are the most common reasons for ED visits. Few tools exist to objectively measure pain perception in the ED setting. We speculated that variation in perception of fixed painful stimuli would explain individual variation in reported pain and response to treatment among ED patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In three studies, we 1) describe performance characteristics of brief quantitative sensory testing (QST) in 50 healthy volunteers, 2) test effects of 10 mg oxycodone versus placebo on QST measures in 18 healthy volunteers, and 3) measure interindividual differences in nociception and treatment responses in 198 ED patients with a painful complaint during ED treatment. QST measures adapted for use in the ED included pressure sensation threshold, pressure pain threshold (PPT), pressure pain response (PPR), and cold pain tolerance (CPT) tests. RESULTS: First, all QST measures had high inter-rater reliability and test–retest reproducibility. Second, 10 mg oxycodone reduced PPR, increased PPT, and prolonged CPT. Third, baseline PPT and PPR revealed hyperalgesia in 31 (16%) ED subjects relative to healthy volunteers. In 173 (88%) ED subjects who completed repeat testing 30 minutes after pain treatment, PPT increased and PPR decreased (Cohen’s d(z) 0.10–0.19). Verbal pain scores (0–10) for the ED complaint decreased by 2.2 (95% confidence intervals [CI]: 1.9, 2.6) (Cohen’s d(z) 0.97) but did not covary with the changes in PPT and PPR (r=0.05–0.13). Treatment effects were greatest in ED subjects with a history of treatment for anxiety or depression (Cohen’s d(z) 0.26–0.43) or with baseline hyperalgesia (Cohen’s d(z) 0.40–0.88). CONCLUSION: QST reveals individual differences in perception of fixed painful stimuli in ED patients, including hyperalgesia. Subgroups of ED patients with hyperalgesia and psychiatric history report larger treatment effects on ED pain and QST measures. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5449126 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Dove Medical Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54491262017-06-02 Quantitative sensory testing measures individual pain responses in emergency department patients Duffy, Kevin J Flickinger, Katharyn L Kristan, Jeffrey T Repine, Melissa J Gianforcaro, Alexandro Hasley, Rebecca B Feroz, Saad Rupp, Jessica M Al-Baghli, Jumana Pacella, Maria L Suffoletto, Brian P Callaway, Clifton W J Pain Res Original Research BACKGROUND: Refining and individualizing treatment of acute pain in the emergency department (ED) is a high priority, given that painful complaints are the most common reasons for ED visits. Few tools exist to objectively measure pain perception in the ED setting. We speculated that variation in perception of fixed painful stimuli would explain individual variation in reported pain and response to treatment among ED patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In three studies, we 1) describe performance characteristics of brief quantitative sensory testing (QST) in 50 healthy volunteers, 2) test effects of 10 mg oxycodone versus placebo on QST measures in 18 healthy volunteers, and 3) measure interindividual differences in nociception and treatment responses in 198 ED patients with a painful complaint during ED treatment. QST measures adapted for use in the ED included pressure sensation threshold, pressure pain threshold (PPT), pressure pain response (PPR), and cold pain tolerance (CPT) tests. RESULTS: First, all QST measures had high inter-rater reliability and test–retest reproducibility. Second, 10 mg oxycodone reduced PPR, increased PPT, and prolonged CPT. Third, baseline PPT and PPR revealed hyperalgesia in 31 (16%) ED subjects relative to healthy volunteers. In 173 (88%) ED subjects who completed repeat testing 30 minutes after pain treatment, PPT increased and PPR decreased (Cohen’s d(z) 0.10–0.19). Verbal pain scores (0–10) for the ED complaint decreased by 2.2 (95% confidence intervals [CI]: 1.9, 2.6) (Cohen’s d(z) 0.97) but did not covary with the changes in PPT and PPR (r=0.05–0.13). Treatment effects were greatest in ED subjects with a history of treatment for anxiety or depression (Cohen’s d(z) 0.26–0.43) or with baseline hyperalgesia (Cohen’s d(z) 0.40–0.88). CONCLUSION: QST reveals individual differences in perception of fixed painful stimuli in ED patients, including hyperalgesia. Subgroups of ED patients with hyperalgesia and psychiatric history report larger treatment effects on ED pain and QST measures. Dove Medical Press 2017-05-24 /pmc/articles/PMC5449126/ /pubmed/28579822 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S132485 Text en © 2017 Duffy et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Duffy, Kevin J Flickinger, Katharyn L Kristan, Jeffrey T Repine, Melissa J Gianforcaro, Alexandro Hasley, Rebecca B Feroz, Saad Rupp, Jessica M Al-Baghli, Jumana Pacella, Maria L Suffoletto, Brian P Callaway, Clifton W Quantitative sensory testing measures individual pain responses in emergency department patients |
title | Quantitative sensory testing measures individual pain responses in emergency department patients |
title_full | Quantitative sensory testing measures individual pain responses in emergency department patients |
title_fullStr | Quantitative sensory testing measures individual pain responses in emergency department patients |
title_full_unstemmed | Quantitative sensory testing measures individual pain responses in emergency department patients |
title_short | Quantitative sensory testing measures individual pain responses in emergency department patients |
title_sort | quantitative sensory testing measures individual pain responses in emergency department patients |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5449126/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28579822 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S132485 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT duffykevinj quantitativesensorytestingmeasuresindividualpainresponsesinemergencydepartmentpatients AT flickingerkatharynl quantitativesensorytestingmeasuresindividualpainresponsesinemergencydepartmentpatients AT kristanjeffreyt quantitativesensorytestingmeasuresindividualpainresponsesinemergencydepartmentpatients AT repinemelissaj quantitativesensorytestingmeasuresindividualpainresponsesinemergencydepartmentpatients AT gianforcaroalexandro quantitativesensorytestingmeasuresindividualpainresponsesinemergencydepartmentpatients AT hasleyrebeccab quantitativesensorytestingmeasuresindividualpainresponsesinemergencydepartmentpatients AT ferozsaad quantitativesensorytestingmeasuresindividualpainresponsesinemergencydepartmentpatients AT ruppjessicam quantitativesensorytestingmeasuresindividualpainresponsesinemergencydepartmentpatients AT albaghlijumana quantitativesensorytestingmeasuresindividualpainresponsesinemergencydepartmentpatients AT pacellamarial quantitativesensorytestingmeasuresindividualpainresponsesinemergencydepartmentpatients AT suffolettobrianp quantitativesensorytestingmeasuresindividualpainresponsesinemergencydepartmentpatients AT callawaycliftonw quantitativesensorytestingmeasuresindividualpainresponsesinemergencydepartmentpatients |