Cargando…

Evaluation of Iontophoretic Collagen Cross-linking for Early Stage of Progressive Keratoconus Compared to Standard Cross-linking: A Non-Inferiority Study

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of iontophoretic collagen cross-linking (I-CXL) compared to epithelium-off standard collagen cross-linking (CXL) in treating the early stages of progressive keratoconus. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study at Oftapr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cantemir, Alina, Alexa, Anisia I., Anton, Nicoleta, Ciuntu, Roxana E., Danielescu, Ciprian, Chiselita, Dorin, Costin, Danut
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Healthcare 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5449295/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28160249
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40123-017-0076-8
_version_ 1783239740745580544
author Cantemir, Alina
Alexa, Anisia I.
Anton, Nicoleta
Ciuntu, Roxana E.
Danielescu, Ciprian
Chiselita, Dorin
Costin, Danut
author_facet Cantemir, Alina
Alexa, Anisia I.
Anton, Nicoleta
Ciuntu, Roxana E.
Danielescu, Ciprian
Chiselita, Dorin
Costin, Danut
author_sort Cantemir, Alina
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of iontophoretic collagen cross-linking (I-CXL) compared to epithelium-off standard collagen cross-linking (CXL) in treating the early stages of progressive keratoconus. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study at Oftaprof Clinic, Iasi, Romania included 40 eyes of 40 patients with progressive keratoconus stage I according to the Amsler classification who underwent I-CXL and the results were compared with a matched group of 40 eyes from 40 patients who received standard CXL. The follow-up period was 24 months. Uncorrected (UCVA) and corrected (CDVA) distance visual acuities, corneal topography, and pachymetry were evaluated in all patients. RESULTS: The mean patient age was 26.52 ± 3.77 years for the standard CXL group and 28.32 ± 4.91 for the I-CXL group. The mean UCVA and CDVA improved significantly in both groups. At 12 months, the improvement of UCVA was greater in the I-CXL group (P < 0.05). There was a statistically significant different trend in CDVA between groups with a more favorable outcome for the standard CXL group (P < 0.01). The manifest cylinder decreased by a mean of 0.962 ± 0.114 D in the epithelium-off CXL group and by 0.831 ± 0.082 D in the I-CXL group (P < 0.001). At 24 months, the K (max) values improved by 1.2 ± 0.199 D in the standard group and by 0.908 ± 0.177 D in the I-CXL group (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: All parameters either improved or remained unchanged after the iontophoretic collagen cross-linking intervention. I-CXL was found to be as effective as the standard technique. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s40123-017-0076-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5449295
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Springer Healthcare
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54492952017-06-15 Evaluation of Iontophoretic Collagen Cross-linking for Early Stage of Progressive Keratoconus Compared to Standard Cross-linking: A Non-Inferiority Study Cantemir, Alina Alexa, Anisia I. Anton, Nicoleta Ciuntu, Roxana E. Danielescu, Ciprian Chiselita, Dorin Costin, Danut Ophthalmol Ther Original Research INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of iontophoretic collagen cross-linking (I-CXL) compared to epithelium-off standard collagen cross-linking (CXL) in treating the early stages of progressive keratoconus. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study at Oftaprof Clinic, Iasi, Romania included 40 eyes of 40 patients with progressive keratoconus stage I according to the Amsler classification who underwent I-CXL and the results were compared with a matched group of 40 eyes from 40 patients who received standard CXL. The follow-up period was 24 months. Uncorrected (UCVA) and corrected (CDVA) distance visual acuities, corneal topography, and pachymetry were evaluated in all patients. RESULTS: The mean patient age was 26.52 ± 3.77 years for the standard CXL group and 28.32 ± 4.91 for the I-CXL group. The mean UCVA and CDVA improved significantly in both groups. At 12 months, the improvement of UCVA was greater in the I-CXL group (P < 0.05). There was a statistically significant different trend in CDVA between groups with a more favorable outcome for the standard CXL group (P < 0.01). The manifest cylinder decreased by a mean of 0.962 ± 0.114 D in the epithelium-off CXL group and by 0.831 ± 0.082 D in the I-CXL group (P < 0.001). At 24 months, the K (max) values improved by 1.2 ± 0.199 D in the standard group and by 0.908 ± 0.177 D in the I-CXL group (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: All parameters either improved or remained unchanged after the iontophoretic collagen cross-linking intervention. I-CXL was found to be as effective as the standard technique. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s40123-017-0076-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Healthcare 2017-02-03 2017-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5449295/ /pubmed/28160249 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40123-017-0076-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Research
Cantemir, Alina
Alexa, Anisia I.
Anton, Nicoleta
Ciuntu, Roxana E.
Danielescu, Ciprian
Chiselita, Dorin
Costin, Danut
Evaluation of Iontophoretic Collagen Cross-linking for Early Stage of Progressive Keratoconus Compared to Standard Cross-linking: A Non-Inferiority Study
title Evaluation of Iontophoretic Collagen Cross-linking for Early Stage of Progressive Keratoconus Compared to Standard Cross-linking: A Non-Inferiority Study
title_full Evaluation of Iontophoretic Collagen Cross-linking for Early Stage of Progressive Keratoconus Compared to Standard Cross-linking: A Non-Inferiority Study
title_fullStr Evaluation of Iontophoretic Collagen Cross-linking for Early Stage of Progressive Keratoconus Compared to Standard Cross-linking: A Non-Inferiority Study
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Iontophoretic Collagen Cross-linking for Early Stage of Progressive Keratoconus Compared to Standard Cross-linking: A Non-Inferiority Study
title_short Evaluation of Iontophoretic Collagen Cross-linking for Early Stage of Progressive Keratoconus Compared to Standard Cross-linking: A Non-Inferiority Study
title_sort evaluation of iontophoretic collagen cross-linking for early stage of progressive keratoconus compared to standard cross-linking: a non-inferiority study
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5449295/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28160249
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40123-017-0076-8
work_keys_str_mv AT cantemiralina evaluationofiontophoreticcollagencrosslinkingforearlystageofprogressivekeratoconuscomparedtostandardcrosslinkinganoninferioritystudy
AT alexaanisiai evaluationofiontophoreticcollagencrosslinkingforearlystageofprogressivekeratoconuscomparedtostandardcrosslinkinganoninferioritystudy
AT antonnicoleta evaluationofiontophoreticcollagencrosslinkingforearlystageofprogressivekeratoconuscomparedtostandardcrosslinkinganoninferioritystudy
AT ciunturoxanae evaluationofiontophoreticcollagencrosslinkingforearlystageofprogressivekeratoconuscomparedtostandardcrosslinkinganoninferioritystudy
AT danielescuciprian evaluationofiontophoreticcollagencrosslinkingforearlystageofprogressivekeratoconuscomparedtostandardcrosslinkinganoninferioritystudy
AT chiselitadorin evaluationofiontophoreticcollagencrosslinkingforearlystageofprogressivekeratoconuscomparedtostandardcrosslinkinganoninferioritystudy
AT costindanut evaluationofiontophoreticcollagencrosslinkingforearlystageofprogressivekeratoconuscomparedtostandardcrosslinkinganoninferioritystudy