Cargando…

Comparison of ocular biometric measurements between a new swept-source optical coherence tomography and a common optical low coherence reflectometry

The purpose of the current study was to compare the measurements between a new optical biometer based on swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT), the OA-2000 (Tomey, Japan), and an optical biometer based on optical low coherence reflectometry (OLCR), the Lenstar (Haag-Streit, Switzerland)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gao, Rongrong, Chen, Hao, Savini, Giacomo, Miao, Yaxin, Wang, Xiaorui, Yang, Jing, Zhao, Weiqi, Wang, Qinmei, Huang, Jinhai
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5449389/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28559547
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-02463-z
_version_ 1783239760021553152
author Gao, Rongrong
Chen, Hao
Savini, Giacomo
Miao, Yaxin
Wang, Xiaorui
Yang, Jing
Zhao, Weiqi
Wang, Qinmei
Huang, Jinhai
author_facet Gao, Rongrong
Chen, Hao
Savini, Giacomo
Miao, Yaxin
Wang, Xiaorui
Yang, Jing
Zhao, Weiqi
Wang, Qinmei
Huang, Jinhai
author_sort Gao, Rongrong
collection PubMed
description The purpose of the current study was to compare the measurements between a new optical biometer based on swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT), the OA-2000 (Tomey, Japan), and an optical biometer based on optical low coherence reflectometry (OLCR), the Lenstar (Haag-Streit, Switzerland). Ninety-nine eyes of 99 healthy subjects were included. The axial length (AL), central corneal thickness (CCT), anterior chamber depth (ACD), aqueous depth (AD), lens thickness (LT), keratometry (K) readings, including flat K (Kf), steep K (Ks), mean K (Km), astigmatism vectors J(0), J(45) at diameters of 2.5 and 3.0 mm, and white-to-white diameter (WTW) were measured three times each using both biometer in normal eyes by random sequence. Bland-Altman analysis showed good agreement between the SS-OCT and OLCR devices for AL, AD, ACD, LT, with narrow 95% LoA (−0.05 to 0.07 mm, −0.09 to 0.10 mm, −0.10 to 0.09 mm, and −0.06 to 0.22 mm, respectively), and the P values of ACD were both >0.05. The CCT, Kf, Ks, Km, J(0), J(45) and WTW values provided by the OA-2000 were in good agreement with the Lenstar, and statistically significant differences were detected for some of them but not clinical differences. The agreement was excellent especially for AL.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5449389
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54493892017-06-01 Comparison of ocular biometric measurements between a new swept-source optical coherence tomography and a common optical low coherence reflectometry Gao, Rongrong Chen, Hao Savini, Giacomo Miao, Yaxin Wang, Xiaorui Yang, Jing Zhao, Weiqi Wang, Qinmei Huang, Jinhai Sci Rep Article The purpose of the current study was to compare the measurements between a new optical biometer based on swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT), the OA-2000 (Tomey, Japan), and an optical biometer based on optical low coherence reflectometry (OLCR), the Lenstar (Haag-Streit, Switzerland). Ninety-nine eyes of 99 healthy subjects were included. The axial length (AL), central corneal thickness (CCT), anterior chamber depth (ACD), aqueous depth (AD), lens thickness (LT), keratometry (K) readings, including flat K (Kf), steep K (Ks), mean K (Km), astigmatism vectors J(0), J(45) at diameters of 2.5 and 3.0 mm, and white-to-white diameter (WTW) were measured three times each using both biometer in normal eyes by random sequence. Bland-Altman analysis showed good agreement between the SS-OCT and OLCR devices for AL, AD, ACD, LT, with narrow 95% LoA (−0.05 to 0.07 mm, −0.09 to 0.10 mm, −0.10 to 0.09 mm, and −0.06 to 0.22 mm, respectively), and the P values of ACD were both >0.05. The CCT, Kf, Ks, Km, J(0), J(45) and WTW values provided by the OA-2000 were in good agreement with the Lenstar, and statistically significant differences were detected for some of them but not clinical differences. The agreement was excellent especially for AL. Nature Publishing Group UK 2017-05-30 /pmc/articles/PMC5449389/ /pubmed/28559547 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-02463-z Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Gao, Rongrong
Chen, Hao
Savini, Giacomo
Miao, Yaxin
Wang, Xiaorui
Yang, Jing
Zhao, Weiqi
Wang, Qinmei
Huang, Jinhai
Comparison of ocular biometric measurements between a new swept-source optical coherence tomography and a common optical low coherence reflectometry
title Comparison of ocular biometric measurements between a new swept-source optical coherence tomography and a common optical low coherence reflectometry
title_full Comparison of ocular biometric measurements between a new swept-source optical coherence tomography and a common optical low coherence reflectometry
title_fullStr Comparison of ocular biometric measurements between a new swept-source optical coherence tomography and a common optical low coherence reflectometry
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of ocular biometric measurements between a new swept-source optical coherence tomography and a common optical low coherence reflectometry
title_short Comparison of ocular biometric measurements between a new swept-source optical coherence tomography and a common optical low coherence reflectometry
title_sort comparison of ocular biometric measurements between a new swept-source optical coherence tomography and a common optical low coherence reflectometry
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5449389/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28559547
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-02463-z
work_keys_str_mv AT gaorongrong comparisonofocularbiometricmeasurementsbetweenanewsweptsourceopticalcoherencetomographyandacommonopticallowcoherencereflectometry
AT chenhao comparisonofocularbiometricmeasurementsbetweenanewsweptsourceopticalcoherencetomographyandacommonopticallowcoherencereflectometry
AT savinigiacomo comparisonofocularbiometricmeasurementsbetweenanewsweptsourceopticalcoherencetomographyandacommonopticallowcoherencereflectometry
AT miaoyaxin comparisonofocularbiometricmeasurementsbetweenanewsweptsourceopticalcoherencetomographyandacommonopticallowcoherencereflectometry
AT wangxiaorui comparisonofocularbiometricmeasurementsbetweenanewsweptsourceopticalcoherencetomographyandacommonopticallowcoherencereflectometry
AT yangjing comparisonofocularbiometricmeasurementsbetweenanewsweptsourceopticalcoherencetomographyandacommonopticallowcoherencereflectometry
AT zhaoweiqi comparisonofocularbiometricmeasurementsbetweenanewsweptsourceopticalcoherencetomographyandacommonopticallowcoherencereflectometry
AT wangqinmei comparisonofocularbiometricmeasurementsbetweenanewsweptsourceopticalcoherencetomographyandacommonopticallowcoherencereflectometry
AT huangjinhai comparisonofocularbiometricmeasurementsbetweenanewsweptsourceopticalcoherencetomographyandacommonopticallowcoherencereflectometry