Cargando…

Antibiotic Resistances in Livestock: A Comparative Approach to Identify an Appropriate Regression Model for Count Data

Antimicrobial resistance in livestock is a matter of general concern. To develop hygiene measures and methods for resistance prevention and control, epidemiological studies on a population level are needed to detect factors associated with antimicrobial resistance in livestock holdings. In general,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hüls, Anke, Frömke, Cornelia, Ickstadt, Katja, Hille, Katja, Hering, Johanna, von Münchhausen, Christiane, Hartmann, Maria, Kreienbrock, Lothar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5449455/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28620609
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2017.00071
_version_ 1783239780425793536
author Hüls, Anke
Frömke, Cornelia
Ickstadt, Katja
Hille, Katja
Hering, Johanna
von Münchhausen, Christiane
Hartmann, Maria
Kreienbrock, Lothar
author_facet Hüls, Anke
Frömke, Cornelia
Ickstadt, Katja
Hille, Katja
Hering, Johanna
von Münchhausen, Christiane
Hartmann, Maria
Kreienbrock, Lothar
author_sort Hüls, Anke
collection PubMed
description Antimicrobial resistance in livestock is a matter of general concern. To develop hygiene measures and methods for resistance prevention and control, epidemiological studies on a population level are needed to detect factors associated with antimicrobial resistance in livestock holdings. In general, regression models are used to describe these relationships between environmental factors and resistance outcome. Besides the study design, the correlation structures of the different outcomes of antibiotic resistance and structural zero measurements on the resistance outcome as well as on the exposure side are challenges for the epidemiological model building process. The use of appropriate regression models that acknowledge these complexities is essential to assure valid epidemiological interpretations. The aims of this paper are (i) to explain the model building process comparing several competing models for count data (negative binomial model, quasi-Poisson model, zero-inflated model, and hurdle model) and (ii) to compare these models using data from a cross-sectional study on antibiotic resistance in animal husbandry. These goals are essential to evaluate which model is most suitable to identify potential prevention measures. The dataset used as an example in our analyses was generated initially to study the prevalence and associated factors for the appearance of cefotaxime-resistant Escherichia coli in 48 German fattening pig farms. For each farm, the outcome was the count of samples with resistant bacteria. There was almost no overdispersion and only moderate evidence of excess zeros in the data. Our analyses show that it is essential to evaluate regression models in studies analyzing the relationship between environmental factors and antibiotic resistances in livestock. After model comparison based on evaluation of model predictions, Akaike information criterion, and Pearson residuals, here the hurdle model was judged to be the most appropriate model.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5449455
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54494552017-06-15 Antibiotic Resistances in Livestock: A Comparative Approach to Identify an Appropriate Regression Model for Count Data Hüls, Anke Frömke, Cornelia Ickstadt, Katja Hille, Katja Hering, Johanna von Münchhausen, Christiane Hartmann, Maria Kreienbrock, Lothar Front Vet Sci Veterinary Science Antimicrobial resistance in livestock is a matter of general concern. To develop hygiene measures and methods for resistance prevention and control, epidemiological studies on a population level are needed to detect factors associated with antimicrobial resistance in livestock holdings. In general, regression models are used to describe these relationships between environmental factors and resistance outcome. Besides the study design, the correlation structures of the different outcomes of antibiotic resistance and structural zero measurements on the resistance outcome as well as on the exposure side are challenges for the epidemiological model building process. The use of appropriate regression models that acknowledge these complexities is essential to assure valid epidemiological interpretations. The aims of this paper are (i) to explain the model building process comparing several competing models for count data (negative binomial model, quasi-Poisson model, zero-inflated model, and hurdle model) and (ii) to compare these models using data from a cross-sectional study on antibiotic resistance in animal husbandry. These goals are essential to evaluate which model is most suitable to identify potential prevention measures. The dataset used as an example in our analyses was generated initially to study the prevalence and associated factors for the appearance of cefotaxime-resistant Escherichia coli in 48 German fattening pig farms. For each farm, the outcome was the count of samples with resistant bacteria. There was almost no overdispersion and only moderate evidence of excess zeros in the data. Our analyses show that it is essential to evaluate regression models in studies analyzing the relationship between environmental factors and antibiotic resistances in livestock. After model comparison based on evaluation of model predictions, Akaike information criterion, and Pearson residuals, here the hurdle model was judged to be the most appropriate model. Frontiers Media S.A. 2017-05-31 /pmc/articles/PMC5449455/ /pubmed/28620609 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2017.00071 Text en Copyright © 2017 Hüls, Frömke, Ickstadt, Hille, Hering, von Münchhausen, Hartmann and Kreienbrock. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Veterinary Science
Hüls, Anke
Frömke, Cornelia
Ickstadt, Katja
Hille, Katja
Hering, Johanna
von Münchhausen, Christiane
Hartmann, Maria
Kreienbrock, Lothar
Antibiotic Resistances in Livestock: A Comparative Approach to Identify an Appropriate Regression Model for Count Data
title Antibiotic Resistances in Livestock: A Comparative Approach to Identify an Appropriate Regression Model for Count Data
title_full Antibiotic Resistances in Livestock: A Comparative Approach to Identify an Appropriate Regression Model for Count Data
title_fullStr Antibiotic Resistances in Livestock: A Comparative Approach to Identify an Appropriate Regression Model for Count Data
title_full_unstemmed Antibiotic Resistances in Livestock: A Comparative Approach to Identify an Appropriate Regression Model for Count Data
title_short Antibiotic Resistances in Livestock: A Comparative Approach to Identify an Appropriate Regression Model for Count Data
title_sort antibiotic resistances in livestock: a comparative approach to identify an appropriate regression model for count data
topic Veterinary Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5449455/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28620609
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2017.00071
work_keys_str_mv AT hulsanke antibioticresistancesinlivestockacomparativeapproachtoidentifyanappropriateregressionmodelforcountdata
AT fromkecornelia antibioticresistancesinlivestockacomparativeapproachtoidentifyanappropriateregressionmodelforcountdata
AT ickstadtkatja antibioticresistancesinlivestockacomparativeapproachtoidentifyanappropriateregressionmodelforcountdata
AT hillekatja antibioticresistancesinlivestockacomparativeapproachtoidentifyanappropriateregressionmodelforcountdata
AT heringjohanna antibioticresistancesinlivestockacomparativeapproachtoidentifyanappropriateregressionmodelforcountdata
AT vonmunchhausenchristiane antibioticresistancesinlivestockacomparativeapproachtoidentifyanappropriateregressionmodelforcountdata
AT hartmannmaria antibioticresistancesinlivestockacomparativeapproachtoidentifyanappropriateregressionmodelforcountdata
AT kreienbrocklothar antibioticresistancesinlivestockacomparativeapproachtoidentifyanappropriateregressionmodelforcountdata