Cargando…
Scoping review of indicators and methods of measurement used to evaluate the impact of dog population management interventions
BACKGROUND: Dogs are ubiquitous in human society and attempts to manage their populations are common to most countries. Managing dog populations is achieved through a range of interventions to suit the dog population dynamics and dog ownership characteristics of the location, with a number of potent...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5450220/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28558736 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12917-017-1051-2 |
_version_ | 1783239924596604928 |
---|---|
author | Hiby, Elly Atema, Kate Nattrass Brimley, Rebecca Hammond-Seaman, Alexandra Jones, Mark Rowan, Andrew Fogelberg, Emelie Kennedy, Mark Balaram, Deepashree Nel, Louis Cleaveland, Sarah Hampson, Katie Townsend, Sunny Lembo, Tiziana Rooney, Nicola Whay, Helen Rebecca Pritchard, Joy Murray, Jane van Dijk, Lisa Waran, Natalie Bacon, Heather Knobel, Darryn Tasker, Lou Baker, Chris Hiby, Lex |
author_facet | Hiby, Elly Atema, Kate Nattrass Brimley, Rebecca Hammond-Seaman, Alexandra Jones, Mark Rowan, Andrew Fogelberg, Emelie Kennedy, Mark Balaram, Deepashree Nel, Louis Cleaveland, Sarah Hampson, Katie Townsend, Sunny Lembo, Tiziana Rooney, Nicola Whay, Helen Rebecca Pritchard, Joy Murray, Jane van Dijk, Lisa Waran, Natalie Bacon, Heather Knobel, Darryn Tasker, Lou Baker, Chris Hiby, Lex |
author_sort | Hiby, Elly |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Dogs are ubiquitous in human society and attempts to manage their populations are common to most countries. Managing dog populations is achieved through a range of interventions to suit the dog population dynamics and dog ownership characteristics of the location, with a number of potential impacts or goals in mind. Impact assessment provides the opportunity for interventions to identify areas of inefficiencies for improvement and build evidence of positive change. METHODS: This scoping review collates 26 studies that have assessed the impacts of dog population management interventions. RESULTS: It reports the use of 29 indicators of change under 8 categories of impact and describes variation in the methods used to measure these indicators. CONCLUSION: The relatively few published examples of impact assessment in dog population management suggest this field is in its infancy; however this review highlights those notable exceptions. By describing those indicators and methods of measurement that have been reported thus far, and apparent barriers to efficient assessment, this review aims to support and direct future impact assessment. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5450220 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54502202017-06-01 Scoping review of indicators and methods of measurement used to evaluate the impact of dog population management interventions Hiby, Elly Atema, Kate Nattrass Brimley, Rebecca Hammond-Seaman, Alexandra Jones, Mark Rowan, Andrew Fogelberg, Emelie Kennedy, Mark Balaram, Deepashree Nel, Louis Cleaveland, Sarah Hampson, Katie Townsend, Sunny Lembo, Tiziana Rooney, Nicola Whay, Helen Rebecca Pritchard, Joy Murray, Jane van Dijk, Lisa Waran, Natalie Bacon, Heather Knobel, Darryn Tasker, Lou Baker, Chris Hiby, Lex BMC Vet Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Dogs are ubiquitous in human society and attempts to manage their populations are common to most countries. Managing dog populations is achieved through a range of interventions to suit the dog population dynamics and dog ownership characteristics of the location, with a number of potential impacts or goals in mind. Impact assessment provides the opportunity for interventions to identify areas of inefficiencies for improvement and build evidence of positive change. METHODS: This scoping review collates 26 studies that have assessed the impacts of dog population management interventions. RESULTS: It reports the use of 29 indicators of change under 8 categories of impact and describes variation in the methods used to measure these indicators. CONCLUSION: The relatively few published examples of impact assessment in dog population management suggest this field is in its infancy; however this review highlights those notable exceptions. By describing those indicators and methods of measurement that have been reported thus far, and apparent barriers to efficient assessment, this review aims to support and direct future impact assessment. BioMed Central 2017-05-30 /pmc/articles/PMC5450220/ /pubmed/28558736 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12917-017-1051-2 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Hiby, Elly Atema, Kate Nattrass Brimley, Rebecca Hammond-Seaman, Alexandra Jones, Mark Rowan, Andrew Fogelberg, Emelie Kennedy, Mark Balaram, Deepashree Nel, Louis Cleaveland, Sarah Hampson, Katie Townsend, Sunny Lembo, Tiziana Rooney, Nicola Whay, Helen Rebecca Pritchard, Joy Murray, Jane van Dijk, Lisa Waran, Natalie Bacon, Heather Knobel, Darryn Tasker, Lou Baker, Chris Hiby, Lex Scoping review of indicators and methods of measurement used to evaluate the impact of dog population management interventions |
title | Scoping review of indicators and methods of measurement used to evaluate the impact of dog population management interventions |
title_full | Scoping review of indicators and methods of measurement used to evaluate the impact of dog population management interventions |
title_fullStr | Scoping review of indicators and methods of measurement used to evaluate the impact of dog population management interventions |
title_full_unstemmed | Scoping review of indicators and methods of measurement used to evaluate the impact of dog population management interventions |
title_short | Scoping review of indicators and methods of measurement used to evaluate the impact of dog population management interventions |
title_sort | scoping review of indicators and methods of measurement used to evaluate the impact of dog population management interventions |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5450220/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28558736 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12917-017-1051-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hibyelly scopingreviewofindicatorsandmethodsofmeasurementusedtoevaluatetheimpactofdogpopulationmanagementinterventions AT atemakatenattrass scopingreviewofindicatorsandmethodsofmeasurementusedtoevaluatetheimpactofdogpopulationmanagementinterventions AT brimleyrebecca scopingreviewofindicatorsandmethodsofmeasurementusedtoevaluatetheimpactofdogpopulationmanagementinterventions AT hammondseamanalexandra scopingreviewofindicatorsandmethodsofmeasurementusedtoevaluatetheimpactofdogpopulationmanagementinterventions AT jonesmark scopingreviewofindicatorsandmethodsofmeasurementusedtoevaluatetheimpactofdogpopulationmanagementinterventions AT rowanandrew scopingreviewofindicatorsandmethodsofmeasurementusedtoevaluatetheimpactofdogpopulationmanagementinterventions AT fogelbergemelie scopingreviewofindicatorsandmethodsofmeasurementusedtoevaluatetheimpactofdogpopulationmanagementinterventions AT kennedymark scopingreviewofindicatorsandmethodsofmeasurementusedtoevaluatetheimpactofdogpopulationmanagementinterventions AT balaramdeepashree scopingreviewofindicatorsandmethodsofmeasurementusedtoevaluatetheimpactofdogpopulationmanagementinterventions AT nellouis scopingreviewofindicatorsandmethodsofmeasurementusedtoevaluatetheimpactofdogpopulationmanagementinterventions AT cleavelandsarah scopingreviewofindicatorsandmethodsofmeasurementusedtoevaluatetheimpactofdogpopulationmanagementinterventions AT hampsonkatie scopingreviewofindicatorsandmethodsofmeasurementusedtoevaluatetheimpactofdogpopulationmanagementinterventions AT townsendsunny scopingreviewofindicatorsandmethodsofmeasurementusedtoevaluatetheimpactofdogpopulationmanagementinterventions AT lembotiziana scopingreviewofindicatorsandmethodsofmeasurementusedtoevaluatetheimpactofdogpopulationmanagementinterventions AT rooneynicola scopingreviewofindicatorsandmethodsofmeasurementusedtoevaluatetheimpactofdogpopulationmanagementinterventions AT whayhelenrebecca scopingreviewofindicatorsandmethodsofmeasurementusedtoevaluatetheimpactofdogpopulationmanagementinterventions AT pritchardjoy scopingreviewofindicatorsandmethodsofmeasurementusedtoevaluatetheimpactofdogpopulationmanagementinterventions AT murrayjane scopingreviewofindicatorsandmethodsofmeasurementusedtoevaluatetheimpactofdogpopulationmanagementinterventions AT vandijklisa scopingreviewofindicatorsandmethodsofmeasurementusedtoevaluatetheimpactofdogpopulationmanagementinterventions AT warannatalie scopingreviewofindicatorsandmethodsofmeasurementusedtoevaluatetheimpactofdogpopulationmanagementinterventions AT baconheather scopingreviewofindicatorsandmethodsofmeasurementusedtoevaluatetheimpactofdogpopulationmanagementinterventions AT knobeldarryn scopingreviewofindicatorsandmethodsofmeasurementusedtoevaluatetheimpactofdogpopulationmanagementinterventions AT taskerlou scopingreviewofindicatorsandmethodsofmeasurementusedtoevaluatetheimpactofdogpopulationmanagementinterventions AT bakerchris scopingreviewofindicatorsandmethodsofmeasurementusedtoevaluatetheimpactofdogpopulationmanagementinterventions AT hibylex scopingreviewofindicatorsandmethodsofmeasurementusedtoevaluatetheimpactofdogpopulationmanagementinterventions |