Cargando…

Uterus preserving surgery versus hysterectomy in the treatment of refractory postpartum haemorrhage in two tertiary maternity units in Cameroon: a cohort analysis of perioperative outcomes

BACKGROUND: Little evidence exists on the efficacy and safety of the different surgical techniques used in the treatment of postpartum haemorrhage (PPH). We aimed to compare uterus preserving surgery (UPS) versus hysterectomy for refractory PPH in terms of perioperative outcomes in a sub-Saharan Afr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dohbit, Julius Sama, Foumane, Pascal, Nkwabong, Elie, Kamouko, Christelle Ogolong, Tochie, Joel Noutakdie, Otabela, Bernard, Mboudou, Emile
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5450395/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28558661
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-017-1346-0
_version_ 1783239962297106432
author Dohbit, Julius Sama
Foumane, Pascal
Nkwabong, Elie
Kamouko, Christelle Ogolong
Tochie, Joel Noutakdie
Otabela, Bernard
Mboudou, Emile
author_facet Dohbit, Julius Sama
Foumane, Pascal
Nkwabong, Elie
Kamouko, Christelle Ogolong
Tochie, Joel Noutakdie
Otabela, Bernard
Mboudou, Emile
author_sort Dohbit, Julius Sama
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Little evidence exists on the efficacy and safety of the different surgical techniques used in the treatment of postpartum haemorrhage (PPH). We aimed to compare uterus preserving surgery (UPS) versus hysterectomy for refractory PPH in terms of perioperative outcomes in a sub-Saharan African country with a known high maternal mortality ratio due to PPH. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study comparing the perioperative outcomes of all women managed by UPS (defined as surgical interventions geared at achieving haemostasis while conserving the uterus) versus hysterectomy (defined as surgical resection of the uterus to achieve haemostasis) for PPH refractory to standard medical management in two tertiary hospitals in Cameroon from January 2004 to December 2014. We excluded patients who underwent hysterectomy after failure of UPS. Comparison was done using the Chi-square test or Fisher exact test where appropriate. Bonferroni adjustment of the p-value was performed in order to reduce the chance of obtaining false-positive results. RESULTS: We included 24 cases of UPS against 36 cases of hysterectomy. The indications of surgery were dominated by uterine rupture and uterine atony in both groups. Types of UPS performed were seven bilateral hypogastric artery ligations, seven hysterorraphies, six bilateral uterine artery ligations, three B-Lynch sutures and one Tsirulnikov triple ligation with an overall uterine salvage rate of 83.3%. Types of hysterectomies were 26 subtotal hysterectomies and 10 total hysterectomies. UPS was associated with maternal deaths (RR: 2.3; 95% CI: 1.38–3.93.; p: 0.0015) and postoperative infections (RR: 1.96; 95% CI: 1.1–3.49; p: 0.0215). The association of UPS with maternal death was not attenuated after Bonferroni correction. Hysterectomy had no statistically significant adverse outcome. CONCLUSION: Hysterectomy is safer than UPS in the management of intractable PPH in our setting. The choice of UPS as first-line surgical management of PPH in resource-limited settings should entail diligent anticipation of these adverse maternal outcomes in order to lessen the perioperative burden of PPH.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5450395
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54503952017-06-01 Uterus preserving surgery versus hysterectomy in the treatment of refractory postpartum haemorrhage in two tertiary maternity units in Cameroon: a cohort analysis of perioperative outcomes Dohbit, Julius Sama Foumane, Pascal Nkwabong, Elie Kamouko, Christelle Ogolong Tochie, Joel Noutakdie Otabela, Bernard Mboudou, Emile BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research Article BACKGROUND: Little evidence exists on the efficacy and safety of the different surgical techniques used in the treatment of postpartum haemorrhage (PPH). We aimed to compare uterus preserving surgery (UPS) versus hysterectomy for refractory PPH in terms of perioperative outcomes in a sub-Saharan African country with a known high maternal mortality ratio due to PPH. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study comparing the perioperative outcomes of all women managed by UPS (defined as surgical interventions geared at achieving haemostasis while conserving the uterus) versus hysterectomy (defined as surgical resection of the uterus to achieve haemostasis) for PPH refractory to standard medical management in two tertiary hospitals in Cameroon from January 2004 to December 2014. We excluded patients who underwent hysterectomy after failure of UPS. Comparison was done using the Chi-square test or Fisher exact test where appropriate. Bonferroni adjustment of the p-value was performed in order to reduce the chance of obtaining false-positive results. RESULTS: We included 24 cases of UPS against 36 cases of hysterectomy. The indications of surgery were dominated by uterine rupture and uterine atony in both groups. Types of UPS performed were seven bilateral hypogastric artery ligations, seven hysterorraphies, six bilateral uterine artery ligations, three B-Lynch sutures and one Tsirulnikov triple ligation with an overall uterine salvage rate of 83.3%. Types of hysterectomies were 26 subtotal hysterectomies and 10 total hysterectomies. UPS was associated with maternal deaths (RR: 2.3; 95% CI: 1.38–3.93.; p: 0.0015) and postoperative infections (RR: 1.96; 95% CI: 1.1–3.49; p: 0.0215). The association of UPS with maternal death was not attenuated after Bonferroni correction. Hysterectomy had no statistically significant adverse outcome. CONCLUSION: Hysterectomy is safer than UPS in the management of intractable PPH in our setting. The choice of UPS as first-line surgical management of PPH in resource-limited settings should entail diligent anticipation of these adverse maternal outcomes in order to lessen the perioperative burden of PPH. BioMed Central 2017-05-30 /pmc/articles/PMC5450395/ /pubmed/28558661 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-017-1346-0 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Dohbit, Julius Sama
Foumane, Pascal
Nkwabong, Elie
Kamouko, Christelle Ogolong
Tochie, Joel Noutakdie
Otabela, Bernard
Mboudou, Emile
Uterus preserving surgery versus hysterectomy in the treatment of refractory postpartum haemorrhage in two tertiary maternity units in Cameroon: a cohort analysis of perioperative outcomes
title Uterus preserving surgery versus hysterectomy in the treatment of refractory postpartum haemorrhage in two tertiary maternity units in Cameroon: a cohort analysis of perioperative outcomes
title_full Uterus preserving surgery versus hysterectomy in the treatment of refractory postpartum haemorrhage in two tertiary maternity units in Cameroon: a cohort analysis of perioperative outcomes
title_fullStr Uterus preserving surgery versus hysterectomy in the treatment of refractory postpartum haemorrhage in two tertiary maternity units in Cameroon: a cohort analysis of perioperative outcomes
title_full_unstemmed Uterus preserving surgery versus hysterectomy in the treatment of refractory postpartum haemorrhage in two tertiary maternity units in Cameroon: a cohort analysis of perioperative outcomes
title_short Uterus preserving surgery versus hysterectomy in the treatment of refractory postpartum haemorrhage in two tertiary maternity units in Cameroon: a cohort analysis of perioperative outcomes
title_sort uterus preserving surgery versus hysterectomy in the treatment of refractory postpartum haemorrhage in two tertiary maternity units in cameroon: a cohort analysis of perioperative outcomes
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5450395/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28558661
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-017-1346-0
work_keys_str_mv AT dohbitjuliussama uteruspreservingsurgeryversushysterectomyinthetreatmentofrefractorypostpartumhaemorrhageintwotertiarymaternityunitsincameroonacohortanalysisofperioperativeoutcomes
AT foumanepascal uteruspreservingsurgeryversushysterectomyinthetreatmentofrefractorypostpartumhaemorrhageintwotertiarymaternityunitsincameroonacohortanalysisofperioperativeoutcomes
AT nkwabongelie uteruspreservingsurgeryversushysterectomyinthetreatmentofrefractorypostpartumhaemorrhageintwotertiarymaternityunitsincameroonacohortanalysisofperioperativeoutcomes
AT kamoukochristelleogolong uteruspreservingsurgeryversushysterectomyinthetreatmentofrefractorypostpartumhaemorrhageintwotertiarymaternityunitsincameroonacohortanalysisofperioperativeoutcomes
AT tochiejoelnoutakdie uteruspreservingsurgeryversushysterectomyinthetreatmentofrefractorypostpartumhaemorrhageintwotertiarymaternityunitsincameroonacohortanalysisofperioperativeoutcomes
AT otabelabernard uteruspreservingsurgeryversushysterectomyinthetreatmentofrefractorypostpartumhaemorrhageintwotertiarymaternityunitsincameroonacohortanalysisofperioperativeoutcomes
AT mboudouemile uteruspreservingsurgeryversushysterectomyinthetreatmentofrefractorypostpartumhaemorrhageintwotertiarymaternityunitsincameroonacohortanalysisofperioperativeoutcomes