Cargando…

Reducing occupational sitting: Workers’ perspectives on participation in a multi-component intervention

BACKGROUND: Office workers spend much of their time sitting, which is now understood to be a risk factor for several chronic diseases. This qualitative study examined participants’ perspectives following their involvement in a cluster randomised controlled trial of a multi-component intervention tar...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hadgraft, Nyssa T., Willenberg, Lisa, LaMontagne, Anthony D., Malkoski, Keti, Dunstan, David W, Healy, Genevieve N, Moodie, Marj, Eakin, Elizabeth G, Owen, Neville, Lawler, Sheleigh P
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5450410/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28558781
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12966-017-0530-y
_version_ 1783239967069175808
author Hadgraft, Nyssa T.
Willenberg, Lisa
LaMontagne, Anthony D.
Malkoski, Keti
Dunstan, David W
Healy, Genevieve N
Moodie, Marj
Eakin, Elizabeth G
Owen, Neville
Lawler, Sheleigh P
author_facet Hadgraft, Nyssa T.
Willenberg, Lisa
LaMontagne, Anthony D.
Malkoski, Keti
Dunstan, David W
Healy, Genevieve N
Moodie, Marj
Eakin, Elizabeth G
Owen, Neville
Lawler, Sheleigh P
author_sort Hadgraft, Nyssa T.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Office workers spend much of their time sitting, which is now understood to be a risk factor for several chronic diseases. This qualitative study examined participants’ perspectives following their involvement in a cluster randomised controlled trial of a multi-component intervention targeting prolonged workplace sitting (Stand Up Victoria). The intervention incorporated a sit-stand workstation, individual health coaching and organisational support strategies. The aim of the study was to explore the acceptability of the intervention, barriers and facilitators to reducing workplace sitting, and perceived effects of the intervention on workplace culture, productivity and health-related outcomes. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews (n = 21 participants) and two focus groups (n = 7) were conducted with intervention participants at the conclusion of the 12 month trial and thematic analysis was used to analyse the data. Questions covered intervention acceptability, overall impact, barriers and facilitators to reducing workplace sitting, and perceived impact on productivity and workplace culture. RESULTS: Overall, participants had positive intervention experiences, perceiving that reductions in workplace sitting were associated with improved health and well-being with limited negative impact on work performance. While sit-stand workstations appeared to be the primary drivers of change, workstation design and limited suitability of standing for some job tasks and situations were perceived as barriers to their use. Social support from team leaders and other participants was perceived to facilitate behavioural changes and a shift in norms towards increased acceptance of standing in the workplace. CONCLUSIONS: Multi-component interventions to reduce workplace sitting, incorporating sit-stand workstations, are acceptable and feasible; however, supportive social and environmental conditions are required to support participant engagement. Best practice approaches to reduce workplace sitting should address the multiple levels of influence on behaviour, including factors that may act as barriers to behavioural change. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12966-017-0530-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5450410
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54504102017-06-01 Reducing occupational sitting: Workers’ perspectives on participation in a multi-component intervention Hadgraft, Nyssa T. Willenberg, Lisa LaMontagne, Anthony D. Malkoski, Keti Dunstan, David W Healy, Genevieve N Moodie, Marj Eakin, Elizabeth G Owen, Neville Lawler, Sheleigh P Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Research BACKGROUND: Office workers spend much of their time sitting, which is now understood to be a risk factor for several chronic diseases. This qualitative study examined participants’ perspectives following their involvement in a cluster randomised controlled trial of a multi-component intervention targeting prolonged workplace sitting (Stand Up Victoria). The intervention incorporated a sit-stand workstation, individual health coaching and organisational support strategies. The aim of the study was to explore the acceptability of the intervention, barriers and facilitators to reducing workplace sitting, and perceived effects of the intervention on workplace culture, productivity and health-related outcomes. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews (n = 21 participants) and two focus groups (n = 7) were conducted with intervention participants at the conclusion of the 12 month trial and thematic analysis was used to analyse the data. Questions covered intervention acceptability, overall impact, barriers and facilitators to reducing workplace sitting, and perceived impact on productivity and workplace culture. RESULTS: Overall, participants had positive intervention experiences, perceiving that reductions in workplace sitting were associated with improved health and well-being with limited negative impact on work performance. While sit-stand workstations appeared to be the primary drivers of change, workstation design and limited suitability of standing for some job tasks and situations were perceived as barriers to their use. Social support from team leaders and other participants was perceived to facilitate behavioural changes and a shift in norms towards increased acceptance of standing in the workplace. CONCLUSIONS: Multi-component interventions to reduce workplace sitting, incorporating sit-stand workstations, are acceptable and feasible; however, supportive social and environmental conditions are required to support participant engagement. Best practice approaches to reduce workplace sitting should address the multiple levels of influence on behaviour, including factors that may act as barriers to behavioural change. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12966-017-0530-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-05-30 /pmc/articles/PMC5450410/ /pubmed/28558781 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12966-017-0530-y Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Hadgraft, Nyssa T.
Willenberg, Lisa
LaMontagne, Anthony D.
Malkoski, Keti
Dunstan, David W
Healy, Genevieve N
Moodie, Marj
Eakin, Elizabeth G
Owen, Neville
Lawler, Sheleigh P
Reducing occupational sitting: Workers’ perspectives on participation in a multi-component intervention
title Reducing occupational sitting: Workers’ perspectives on participation in a multi-component intervention
title_full Reducing occupational sitting: Workers’ perspectives on participation in a multi-component intervention
title_fullStr Reducing occupational sitting: Workers’ perspectives on participation in a multi-component intervention
title_full_unstemmed Reducing occupational sitting: Workers’ perspectives on participation in a multi-component intervention
title_short Reducing occupational sitting: Workers’ perspectives on participation in a multi-component intervention
title_sort reducing occupational sitting: workers’ perspectives on participation in a multi-component intervention
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5450410/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28558781
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12966-017-0530-y
work_keys_str_mv AT hadgraftnyssat reducingoccupationalsittingworkersperspectivesonparticipationinamulticomponentintervention
AT willenberglisa reducingoccupationalsittingworkersperspectivesonparticipationinamulticomponentintervention
AT lamontagneanthonyd reducingoccupationalsittingworkersperspectivesonparticipationinamulticomponentintervention
AT malkoskiketi reducingoccupationalsittingworkersperspectivesonparticipationinamulticomponentintervention
AT dunstandavidw reducingoccupationalsittingworkersperspectivesonparticipationinamulticomponentintervention
AT healygenevieven reducingoccupationalsittingworkersperspectivesonparticipationinamulticomponentintervention
AT moodiemarj reducingoccupationalsittingworkersperspectivesonparticipationinamulticomponentintervention
AT eakinelizabethg reducingoccupationalsittingworkersperspectivesonparticipationinamulticomponentintervention
AT owenneville reducingoccupationalsittingworkersperspectivesonparticipationinamulticomponentintervention
AT lawlersheleighp reducingoccupationalsittingworkersperspectivesonparticipationinamulticomponentintervention