Cargando…
Reducing occupational sitting: Workers’ perspectives on participation in a multi-component intervention
BACKGROUND: Office workers spend much of their time sitting, which is now understood to be a risk factor for several chronic diseases. This qualitative study examined participants’ perspectives following their involvement in a cluster randomised controlled trial of a multi-component intervention tar...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5450410/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28558781 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12966-017-0530-y |
_version_ | 1783239967069175808 |
---|---|
author | Hadgraft, Nyssa T. Willenberg, Lisa LaMontagne, Anthony D. Malkoski, Keti Dunstan, David W Healy, Genevieve N Moodie, Marj Eakin, Elizabeth G Owen, Neville Lawler, Sheleigh P |
author_facet | Hadgraft, Nyssa T. Willenberg, Lisa LaMontagne, Anthony D. Malkoski, Keti Dunstan, David W Healy, Genevieve N Moodie, Marj Eakin, Elizabeth G Owen, Neville Lawler, Sheleigh P |
author_sort | Hadgraft, Nyssa T. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Office workers spend much of their time sitting, which is now understood to be a risk factor for several chronic diseases. This qualitative study examined participants’ perspectives following their involvement in a cluster randomised controlled trial of a multi-component intervention targeting prolonged workplace sitting (Stand Up Victoria). The intervention incorporated a sit-stand workstation, individual health coaching and organisational support strategies. The aim of the study was to explore the acceptability of the intervention, barriers and facilitators to reducing workplace sitting, and perceived effects of the intervention on workplace culture, productivity and health-related outcomes. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews (n = 21 participants) and two focus groups (n = 7) were conducted with intervention participants at the conclusion of the 12 month trial and thematic analysis was used to analyse the data. Questions covered intervention acceptability, overall impact, barriers and facilitators to reducing workplace sitting, and perceived impact on productivity and workplace culture. RESULTS: Overall, participants had positive intervention experiences, perceiving that reductions in workplace sitting were associated with improved health and well-being with limited negative impact on work performance. While sit-stand workstations appeared to be the primary drivers of change, workstation design and limited suitability of standing for some job tasks and situations were perceived as barriers to their use. Social support from team leaders and other participants was perceived to facilitate behavioural changes and a shift in norms towards increased acceptance of standing in the workplace. CONCLUSIONS: Multi-component interventions to reduce workplace sitting, incorporating sit-stand workstations, are acceptable and feasible; however, supportive social and environmental conditions are required to support participant engagement. Best practice approaches to reduce workplace sitting should address the multiple levels of influence on behaviour, including factors that may act as barriers to behavioural change. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12966-017-0530-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5450410 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54504102017-06-01 Reducing occupational sitting: Workers’ perspectives on participation in a multi-component intervention Hadgraft, Nyssa T. Willenberg, Lisa LaMontagne, Anthony D. Malkoski, Keti Dunstan, David W Healy, Genevieve N Moodie, Marj Eakin, Elizabeth G Owen, Neville Lawler, Sheleigh P Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Research BACKGROUND: Office workers spend much of their time sitting, which is now understood to be a risk factor for several chronic diseases. This qualitative study examined participants’ perspectives following their involvement in a cluster randomised controlled trial of a multi-component intervention targeting prolonged workplace sitting (Stand Up Victoria). The intervention incorporated a sit-stand workstation, individual health coaching and organisational support strategies. The aim of the study was to explore the acceptability of the intervention, barriers and facilitators to reducing workplace sitting, and perceived effects of the intervention on workplace culture, productivity and health-related outcomes. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews (n = 21 participants) and two focus groups (n = 7) were conducted with intervention participants at the conclusion of the 12 month trial and thematic analysis was used to analyse the data. Questions covered intervention acceptability, overall impact, barriers and facilitators to reducing workplace sitting, and perceived impact on productivity and workplace culture. RESULTS: Overall, participants had positive intervention experiences, perceiving that reductions in workplace sitting were associated with improved health and well-being with limited negative impact on work performance. While sit-stand workstations appeared to be the primary drivers of change, workstation design and limited suitability of standing for some job tasks and situations were perceived as barriers to their use. Social support from team leaders and other participants was perceived to facilitate behavioural changes and a shift in norms towards increased acceptance of standing in the workplace. CONCLUSIONS: Multi-component interventions to reduce workplace sitting, incorporating sit-stand workstations, are acceptable and feasible; however, supportive social and environmental conditions are required to support participant engagement. Best practice approaches to reduce workplace sitting should address the multiple levels of influence on behaviour, including factors that may act as barriers to behavioural change. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12966-017-0530-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-05-30 /pmc/articles/PMC5450410/ /pubmed/28558781 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12966-017-0530-y Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Hadgraft, Nyssa T. Willenberg, Lisa LaMontagne, Anthony D. Malkoski, Keti Dunstan, David W Healy, Genevieve N Moodie, Marj Eakin, Elizabeth G Owen, Neville Lawler, Sheleigh P Reducing occupational sitting: Workers’ perspectives on participation in a multi-component intervention |
title | Reducing occupational sitting: Workers’ perspectives on participation in a multi-component intervention |
title_full | Reducing occupational sitting: Workers’ perspectives on participation in a multi-component intervention |
title_fullStr | Reducing occupational sitting: Workers’ perspectives on participation in a multi-component intervention |
title_full_unstemmed | Reducing occupational sitting: Workers’ perspectives on participation in a multi-component intervention |
title_short | Reducing occupational sitting: Workers’ perspectives on participation in a multi-component intervention |
title_sort | reducing occupational sitting: workers’ perspectives on participation in a multi-component intervention |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5450410/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28558781 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12966-017-0530-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hadgraftnyssat reducingoccupationalsittingworkersperspectivesonparticipationinamulticomponentintervention AT willenberglisa reducingoccupationalsittingworkersperspectivesonparticipationinamulticomponentintervention AT lamontagneanthonyd reducingoccupationalsittingworkersperspectivesonparticipationinamulticomponentintervention AT malkoskiketi reducingoccupationalsittingworkersperspectivesonparticipationinamulticomponentintervention AT dunstandavidw reducingoccupationalsittingworkersperspectivesonparticipationinamulticomponentintervention AT healygenevieven reducingoccupationalsittingworkersperspectivesonparticipationinamulticomponentintervention AT moodiemarj reducingoccupationalsittingworkersperspectivesonparticipationinamulticomponentintervention AT eakinelizabethg reducingoccupationalsittingworkersperspectivesonparticipationinamulticomponentintervention AT owenneville reducingoccupationalsittingworkersperspectivesonparticipationinamulticomponentintervention AT lawlersheleighp reducingoccupationalsittingworkersperspectivesonparticipationinamulticomponentintervention |