Cargando…
Training Nuclei Detection Algorithms with Simple Annotations
BACKGROUND: Generating good training datasets is essential for machine learning-based nuclei detection methods. However, creating exhaustive nuclei contour annotations, to derive optimal training data from, is often infeasible. METHODS: We compared different approaches for training nuclei detection...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5450511/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28584683 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jpi.jpi_3_17 |
_version_ | 1783239993198641152 |
---|---|
author | Kost, Henning Homeyer, André Molin, Jesper Lundström, Claes Hahn, Horst Karl |
author_facet | Kost, Henning Homeyer, André Molin, Jesper Lundström, Claes Hahn, Horst Karl |
author_sort | Kost, Henning |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Generating good training datasets is essential for machine learning-based nuclei detection methods. However, creating exhaustive nuclei contour annotations, to derive optimal training data from, is often infeasible. METHODS: We compared different approaches for training nuclei detection methods solely based on nucleus center markers. Such markers contain less accurate information, especially with regard to nuclear boundaries, but can be produced much easier and in greater quantities. The approaches use different automated sample extraction methods to derive image positions and class labels from nucleus center markers. In addition, the approaches use different automated sample selection methods to improve the detection quality of the classification algorithm and reduce the run time of the training process. We evaluated the approaches based on a previously published generic nuclei detection algorithm and a set of Ki-67-stained breast cancer images. RESULTS: A Voronoi tessellation-based sample extraction method produced the best performing training sets. However, subsampling of the extracted training samples was crucial. Even simple class balancing improved the detection quality considerably. The incorporation of active learning led to a further increase in detection quality. CONCLUSIONS: With appropriate sample extraction and selection methods, nuclei detection algorithms trained on the basis of simple center marker annotations can produce comparable quality to algorithms trained on conventionally created training sets. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5450511 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54505112017-06-05 Training Nuclei Detection Algorithms with Simple Annotations Kost, Henning Homeyer, André Molin, Jesper Lundström, Claes Hahn, Horst Karl J Pathol Inform Research Article BACKGROUND: Generating good training datasets is essential for machine learning-based nuclei detection methods. However, creating exhaustive nuclei contour annotations, to derive optimal training data from, is often infeasible. METHODS: We compared different approaches for training nuclei detection methods solely based on nucleus center markers. Such markers contain less accurate information, especially with regard to nuclear boundaries, but can be produced much easier and in greater quantities. The approaches use different automated sample extraction methods to derive image positions and class labels from nucleus center markers. In addition, the approaches use different automated sample selection methods to improve the detection quality of the classification algorithm and reduce the run time of the training process. We evaluated the approaches based on a previously published generic nuclei detection algorithm and a set of Ki-67-stained breast cancer images. RESULTS: A Voronoi tessellation-based sample extraction method produced the best performing training sets. However, subsampling of the extracted training samples was crucial. Even simple class balancing improved the detection quality considerably. The incorporation of active learning led to a further increase in detection quality. CONCLUSIONS: With appropriate sample extraction and selection methods, nuclei detection algorithms trained on the basis of simple center marker annotations can produce comparable quality to algorithms trained on conventionally created training sets. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017-05-15 /pmc/articles/PMC5450511/ /pubmed/28584683 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jpi.jpi_3_17 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Journal of Pathology Informatics http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Kost, Henning Homeyer, André Molin, Jesper Lundström, Claes Hahn, Horst Karl Training Nuclei Detection Algorithms with Simple Annotations |
title | Training Nuclei Detection Algorithms with Simple Annotations |
title_full | Training Nuclei Detection Algorithms with Simple Annotations |
title_fullStr | Training Nuclei Detection Algorithms with Simple Annotations |
title_full_unstemmed | Training Nuclei Detection Algorithms with Simple Annotations |
title_short | Training Nuclei Detection Algorithms with Simple Annotations |
title_sort | training nuclei detection algorithms with simple annotations |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5450511/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28584683 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jpi.jpi_3_17 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kosthenning trainingnucleidetectionalgorithmswithsimpleannotations AT homeyerandre trainingnucleidetectionalgorithmswithsimpleannotations AT molinjesper trainingnucleidetectionalgorithmswithsimpleannotations AT lundstromclaes trainingnucleidetectionalgorithmswithsimpleannotations AT hahnhorstkarl trainingnucleidetectionalgorithmswithsimpleannotations |