Cargando…

Training Nuclei Detection Algorithms with Simple Annotations

BACKGROUND: Generating good training datasets is essential for machine learning-based nuclei detection methods. However, creating exhaustive nuclei contour annotations, to derive optimal training data from, is often infeasible. METHODS: We compared different approaches for training nuclei detection...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kost, Henning, Homeyer, André, Molin, Jesper, Lundström, Claes, Hahn, Horst Karl
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5450511/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28584683
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jpi.jpi_3_17
_version_ 1783239993198641152
author Kost, Henning
Homeyer, André
Molin, Jesper
Lundström, Claes
Hahn, Horst Karl
author_facet Kost, Henning
Homeyer, André
Molin, Jesper
Lundström, Claes
Hahn, Horst Karl
author_sort Kost, Henning
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Generating good training datasets is essential for machine learning-based nuclei detection methods. However, creating exhaustive nuclei contour annotations, to derive optimal training data from, is often infeasible. METHODS: We compared different approaches for training nuclei detection methods solely based on nucleus center markers. Such markers contain less accurate information, especially with regard to nuclear boundaries, but can be produced much easier and in greater quantities. The approaches use different automated sample extraction methods to derive image positions and class labels from nucleus center markers. In addition, the approaches use different automated sample selection methods to improve the detection quality of the classification algorithm and reduce the run time of the training process. We evaluated the approaches based on a previously published generic nuclei detection algorithm and a set of Ki-67-stained breast cancer images. RESULTS: A Voronoi tessellation-based sample extraction method produced the best performing training sets. However, subsampling of the extracted training samples was crucial. Even simple class balancing improved the detection quality considerably. The incorporation of active learning led to a further increase in detection quality. CONCLUSIONS: With appropriate sample extraction and selection methods, nuclei detection algorithms trained on the basis of simple center marker annotations can produce comparable quality to algorithms trained on conventionally created training sets.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5450511
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54505112017-06-05 Training Nuclei Detection Algorithms with Simple Annotations Kost, Henning Homeyer, André Molin, Jesper Lundström, Claes Hahn, Horst Karl J Pathol Inform Research Article BACKGROUND: Generating good training datasets is essential for machine learning-based nuclei detection methods. However, creating exhaustive nuclei contour annotations, to derive optimal training data from, is often infeasible. METHODS: We compared different approaches for training nuclei detection methods solely based on nucleus center markers. Such markers contain less accurate information, especially with regard to nuclear boundaries, but can be produced much easier and in greater quantities. The approaches use different automated sample extraction methods to derive image positions and class labels from nucleus center markers. In addition, the approaches use different automated sample selection methods to improve the detection quality of the classification algorithm and reduce the run time of the training process. We evaluated the approaches based on a previously published generic nuclei detection algorithm and a set of Ki-67-stained breast cancer images. RESULTS: A Voronoi tessellation-based sample extraction method produced the best performing training sets. However, subsampling of the extracted training samples was crucial. Even simple class balancing improved the detection quality considerably. The incorporation of active learning led to a further increase in detection quality. CONCLUSIONS: With appropriate sample extraction and selection methods, nuclei detection algorithms trained on the basis of simple center marker annotations can produce comparable quality to algorithms trained on conventionally created training sets. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017-05-15 /pmc/articles/PMC5450511/ /pubmed/28584683 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jpi.jpi_3_17 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Journal of Pathology Informatics http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kost, Henning
Homeyer, André
Molin, Jesper
Lundström, Claes
Hahn, Horst Karl
Training Nuclei Detection Algorithms with Simple Annotations
title Training Nuclei Detection Algorithms with Simple Annotations
title_full Training Nuclei Detection Algorithms with Simple Annotations
title_fullStr Training Nuclei Detection Algorithms with Simple Annotations
title_full_unstemmed Training Nuclei Detection Algorithms with Simple Annotations
title_short Training Nuclei Detection Algorithms with Simple Annotations
title_sort training nuclei detection algorithms with simple annotations
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5450511/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28584683
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jpi.jpi_3_17
work_keys_str_mv AT kosthenning trainingnucleidetectionalgorithmswithsimpleannotations
AT homeyerandre trainingnucleidetectionalgorithmswithsimpleannotations
AT molinjesper trainingnucleidetectionalgorithmswithsimpleannotations
AT lundstromclaes trainingnucleidetectionalgorithmswithsimpleannotations
AT hahnhorstkarl trainingnucleidetectionalgorithmswithsimpleannotations