Cargando…

Dynamic Responses in Brain Networks to Social Feedback: A Dual EEG Acquisition Study in Adolescent Couples

Adolescence is a sensitive period for the development of romantic relationships. During this period the maturation of frontolimbic networks is particularly important for the capacity to regulate emotional experiences. In previous research, both functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and dense...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kuo, Ching-Chang, Ha, Thao, Ebbert, Ashley M., Tucker, Don M., Dishion, Thomas J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5450753/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28620292
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fncom.2017.00046
_version_ 1783240049795530752
author Kuo, Ching-Chang
Ha, Thao
Ebbert, Ashley M.
Tucker, Don M.
Dishion, Thomas J.
author_facet Kuo, Ching-Chang
Ha, Thao
Ebbert, Ashley M.
Tucker, Don M.
Dishion, Thomas J.
author_sort Kuo, Ching-Chang
collection PubMed
description Adolescence is a sensitive period for the development of romantic relationships. During this period the maturation of frontolimbic networks is particularly important for the capacity to regulate emotional experiences. In previous research, both functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and dense array electroencephalography (dEEG) measures have suggested that responses in limbic regions are enhanced in adolescents experiencing social rejection. In the present research, we examined social acceptance and rejection from romantic partners as they engaged in a Chatroom Interact Task. Dual 128-channel dEEG systems were used to record neural responses to acceptance and rejection from both adolescent romantic partners and unfamiliar peers (N = 75). We employed a two-step temporal principal component analysis (PCA) and spatial independent component analysis (ICA) approach to statistically identify the neural components related to social feedback. Results revealed that the early (288 ms) discrimination between acceptance and rejection reflected by the P3a component was significant for the romantic partner but not the unfamiliar peer. In contrast, the later (364 ms) P3b component discriminated between acceptance and rejection for both partners and peers. The two-step approach (PCA then ICA) was better able than either PCA or ICA alone in separating these components of the brain's electrical activity that reflected both temporal and spatial phases of the brain's processing of social feedback.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5450753
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54507532017-06-15 Dynamic Responses in Brain Networks to Social Feedback: A Dual EEG Acquisition Study in Adolescent Couples Kuo, Ching-Chang Ha, Thao Ebbert, Ashley M. Tucker, Don M. Dishion, Thomas J. Front Comput Neurosci Neuroscience Adolescence is a sensitive period for the development of romantic relationships. During this period the maturation of frontolimbic networks is particularly important for the capacity to regulate emotional experiences. In previous research, both functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and dense array electroencephalography (dEEG) measures have suggested that responses in limbic regions are enhanced in adolescents experiencing social rejection. In the present research, we examined social acceptance and rejection from romantic partners as they engaged in a Chatroom Interact Task. Dual 128-channel dEEG systems were used to record neural responses to acceptance and rejection from both adolescent romantic partners and unfamiliar peers (N = 75). We employed a two-step temporal principal component analysis (PCA) and spatial independent component analysis (ICA) approach to statistically identify the neural components related to social feedback. Results revealed that the early (288 ms) discrimination between acceptance and rejection reflected by the P3a component was significant for the romantic partner but not the unfamiliar peer. In contrast, the later (364 ms) P3b component discriminated between acceptance and rejection for both partners and peers. The two-step approach (PCA then ICA) was better able than either PCA or ICA alone in separating these components of the brain's electrical activity that reflected both temporal and spatial phases of the brain's processing of social feedback. Frontiers Media S.A. 2017-05-31 /pmc/articles/PMC5450753/ /pubmed/28620292 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fncom.2017.00046 Text en Copyright © 2017 Kuo, Ha, Ebbert, Tucker and Dishion. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Kuo, Ching-Chang
Ha, Thao
Ebbert, Ashley M.
Tucker, Don M.
Dishion, Thomas J.
Dynamic Responses in Brain Networks to Social Feedback: A Dual EEG Acquisition Study in Adolescent Couples
title Dynamic Responses in Brain Networks to Social Feedback: A Dual EEG Acquisition Study in Adolescent Couples
title_full Dynamic Responses in Brain Networks to Social Feedback: A Dual EEG Acquisition Study in Adolescent Couples
title_fullStr Dynamic Responses in Brain Networks to Social Feedback: A Dual EEG Acquisition Study in Adolescent Couples
title_full_unstemmed Dynamic Responses in Brain Networks to Social Feedback: A Dual EEG Acquisition Study in Adolescent Couples
title_short Dynamic Responses in Brain Networks to Social Feedback: A Dual EEG Acquisition Study in Adolescent Couples
title_sort dynamic responses in brain networks to social feedback: a dual eeg acquisition study in adolescent couples
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5450753/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28620292
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fncom.2017.00046
work_keys_str_mv AT kuochingchang dynamicresponsesinbrainnetworkstosocialfeedbackadualeegacquisitionstudyinadolescentcouples
AT hathao dynamicresponsesinbrainnetworkstosocialfeedbackadualeegacquisitionstudyinadolescentcouples
AT ebbertashleym dynamicresponsesinbrainnetworkstosocialfeedbackadualeegacquisitionstudyinadolescentcouples
AT tuckerdonm dynamicresponsesinbrainnetworkstosocialfeedbackadualeegacquisitionstudyinadolescentcouples
AT dishionthomasj dynamicresponsesinbrainnetworkstosocialfeedbackadualeegacquisitionstudyinadolescentcouples