Cargando…

Comparison of osteogenic potential of poly-ether-ether-ketone with titanium-coated poly-ether-ether-ketone and titanium-blended poly-ether-ether-ketone: An in vitro study

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Poly-ether-ether-ketone (PEEK), a high-performance semi-crystalline thermoplastic polymer, has been employed to replace the metallic implant components in orthopedics. There were various studies performed in accordance to medical grade PEEK, but the relationship between titaniu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kumar, T. Anjan, Jei, J. Brintha, Muthukumar, B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5450891/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28584418
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jips.jips_166_16
_version_ 1783240074880614400
author Kumar, T. Anjan
Jei, J. Brintha
Muthukumar, B.
author_facet Kumar, T. Anjan
Jei, J. Brintha
Muthukumar, B.
author_sort Kumar, T. Anjan
collection PubMed
description STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Poly-ether-ether-ketone (PEEK), a high-performance semi-crystalline thermoplastic polymer, has been employed to replace the metallic implant components in orthopedics. There were various studies performed in accordance to medical grade PEEK, but the relationship between titanium dioxide (TiO(2))-coated PEEK, TiO(2)-blended PEEK, and untreated PEEK still remains complicated, even undefined. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare and quantify the osteogenic potential of untreated PEEK, TiO(2)-coated PEEK and TiO(2)-blended PEEK. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three groups with ten samples in each group were designed for this study. They were Group 1 - Untreated PEEK, Group 2 - TiO(2)-coated PEEK, Group 3 - TiO(2)-blended PEEK. The PEEK samples were prepared according to the ISO standard 15309:2013 and milled to size of 15 mm × 2 mm, and the surfaces were finished with grit-blasted alumina of size 20 μm. In this 10 samples were chosen for Group 1. Group 2 samples were prepared by coating TiO(2) nanoparticles by arc ion plating, and Group 3 samples were prepared by blending TiO(2) nanoparticles in HAAKE rheocord with degree of blending analyzed by torque rheometer. These samples were tested for cytotoxicity using human osteosarcoma cells, and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity was performed to evaluate and quantify the bone mineralization process. The cross-sectional and the fracture morphology of coatings was observed by a field emission scanning electron microscope (SEM) with the magnification range ×20–×200,000. RESULT: Results of cytotoxicity assay and ALP assay of Group 1, Group 2, and Group 3 were statistically analyzed. SEM analysis result clearly showed the difference in the matrix before and after cell adhesion. CONCLUSION: The results made it evident that n-TiO(2)-coated PEEK was more versatile biomaterial of choice in implant dentistry followed by n-TiO(2)-blended PEEK and untreated PEEK.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5450891
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54508912018-04-01 Comparison of osteogenic potential of poly-ether-ether-ketone with titanium-coated poly-ether-ether-ketone and titanium-blended poly-ether-ether-ketone: An in vitro study Kumar, T. Anjan Jei, J. Brintha Muthukumar, B. J Indian Prosthodont Soc Original Article STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Poly-ether-ether-ketone (PEEK), a high-performance semi-crystalline thermoplastic polymer, has been employed to replace the metallic implant components in orthopedics. There were various studies performed in accordance to medical grade PEEK, but the relationship between titanium dioxide (TiO(2))-coated PEEK, TiO(2)-blended PEEK, and untreated PEEK still remains complicated, even undefined. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare and quantify the osteogenic potential of untreated PEEK, TiO(2)-coated PEEK and TiO(2)-blended PEEK. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three groups with ten samples in each group were designed for this study. They were Group 1 - Untreated PEEK, Group 2 - TiO(2)-coated PEEK, Group 3 - TiO(2)-blended PEEK. The PEEK samples were prepared according to the ISO standard 15309:2013 and milled to size of 15 mm × 2 mm, and the surfaces were finished with grit-blasted alumina of size 20 μm. In this 10 samples were chosen for Group 1. Group 2 samples were prepared by coating TiO(2) nanoparticles by arc ion plating, and Group 3 samples were prepared by blending TiO(2) nanoparticles in HAAKE rheocord with degree of blending analyzed by torque rheometer. These samples were tested for cytotoxicity using human osteosarcoma cells, and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity was performed to evaluate and quantify the bone mineralization process. The cross-sectional and the fracture morphology of coatings was observed by a field emission scanning electron microscope (SEM) with the magnification range ×20–×200,000. RESULT: Results of cytotoxicity assay and ALP assay of Group 1, Group 2, and Group 3 were statistically analyzed. SEM analysis result clearly showed the difference in the matrix before and after cell adhesion. CONCLUSION: The results made it evident that n-TiO(2)-coated PEEK was more versatile biomaterial of choice in implant dentistry followed by n-TiO(2)-blended PEEK and untreated PEEK. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5450891/ /pubmed/28584418 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jips.jips_166_16 Text en Copyright: © 2017 The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Kumar, T. Anjan
Jei, J. Brintha
Muthukumar, B.
Comparison of osteogenic potential of poly-ether-ether-ketone with titanium-coated poly-ether-ether-ketone and titanium-blended poly-ether-ether-ketone: An in vitro study
title Comparison of osteogenic potential of poly-ether-ether-ketone with titanium-coated poly-ether-ether-ketone and titanium-blended poly-ether-ether-ketone: An in vitro study
title_full Comparison of osteogenic potential of poly-ether-ether-ketone with titanium-coated poly-ether-ether-ketone and titanium-blended poly-ether-ether-ketone: An in vitro study
title_fullStr Comparison of osteogenic potential of poly-ether-ether-ketone with titanium-coated poly-ether-ether-ketone and titanium-blended poly-ether-ether-ketone: An in vitro study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of osteogenic potential of poly-ether-ether-ketone with titanium-coated poly-ether-ether-ketone and titanium-blended poly-ether-ether-ketone: An in vitro study
title_short Comparison of osteogenic potential of poly-ether-ether-ketone with titanium-coated poly-ether-ether-ketone and titanium-blended poly-ether-ether-ketone: An in vitro study
title_sort comparison of osteogenic potential of poly-ether-ether-ketone with titanium-coated poly-ether-ether-ketone and titanium-blended poly-ether-ether-ketone: an in vitro study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5450891/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28584418
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jips.jips_166_16
work_keys_str_mv AT kumartanjan comparisonofosteogenicpotentialofpolyetheretherketonewithtitaniumcoatedpolyetheretherketoneandtitaniumblendedpolyetheretherketoneaninvitrostudy
AT jeijbrintha comparisonofosteogenicpotentialofpolyetheretherketonewithtitaniumcoatedpolyetheretherketoneandtitaniumblendedpolyetheretherketoneaninvitrostudy
AT muthukumarb comparisonofosteogenicpotentialofpolyetheretherketonewithtitaniumcoatedpolyetheretherketoneandtitaniumblendedpolyetheretherketoneaninvitrostudy