Cargando…

Development of the Ultra-Low Vision Visual Functioning Questionnaire (ULV-VFQ)

PURPOSE: To develop and psychometrically evaluate a visual functioning questionnaire (VFQ) in an ultra-low vision (ULV) population. METHODS: Questionnaire items, based on visual activities self-reported by a ULV population, were categorized by functional visual domain (e.g., mobility) and visual asp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jeter, Pamela E., Rozanski, Collin, Massof, Robert, Adeyemo, Olukemi, Dagnelie, Gislin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5450923/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28573075
http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.6.3.11
_version_ 1783240079023538176
author Jeter, Pamela E.
Rozanski, Collin
Massof, Robert
Adeyemo, Olukemi
Dagnelie, Gislin
author_facet Jeter, Pamela E.
Rozanski, Collin
Massof, Robert
Adeyemo, Olukemi
Dagnelie, Gislin
author_sort Jeter, Pamela E.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To develop and psychometrically evaluate a visual functioning questionnaire (VFQ) in an ultra-low vision (ULV) population. METHODS: Questionnaire items, based on visual activities self-reported by a ULV population, were categorized by functional visual domain (e.g., mobility) and visual aspect (e.g., contrast) to ensure a representative distribution. In Round 1, an initial set of 149 items was generated and administered to 90 participants with ULV (visual acuity [VA] ≤ 20/500; mean [SD] age 61 [15] years), including six patients with a retinal implant. Psychometric properties were evaluated through Rasch analysis and a revised set (150 items) was administered to 80 participants in Round 2. RESULTS: In Round 1, the person measure distribution (range, 8.6 logits) was centered at −1.50 logits relative to the item measures. In Round 2, the person measure distribution (range, 9.5 logits) was centered at −0.86 relative to the item mean. The reliability index in both rounds was 0.97 for Items and 0.99 for Persons. Infit analysis showed four underfit items in Round 1, five underfit items in Round 2 with a z-score greater than 4 cutoff. Principal component analysis on the residuals found 69.9% explained variance; the largest component in the unexplained variance was less than 3%. CONCLUSIONS: The ULV-VFQ, developed with content generated from a ULV population, showed excellent psychometric properties as well as superior measurement validity in a ULV population. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: The ULV-VFQ, part of the Prosthetic Low Vision Rehabilitation (PLoVR) development program, is a new VFQ developed for assessment of functional vision in ULV populations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5450923
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54509232017-06-01 Development of the Ultra-Low Vision Visual Functioning Questionnaire (ULV-VFQ) Jeter, Pamela E. Rozanski, Collin Massof, Robert Adeyemo, Olukemi Dagnelie, Gislin Transl Vis Sci Technol Articles PURPOSE: To develop and psychometrically evaluate a visual functioning questionnaire (VFQ) in an ultra-low vision (ULV) population. METHODS: Questionnaire items, based on visual activities self-reported by a ULV population, were categorized by functional visual domain (e.g., mobility) and visual aspect (e.g., contrast) to ensure a representative distribution. In Round 1, an initial set of 149 items was generated and administered to 90 participants with ULV (visual acuity [VA] ≤ 20/500; mean [SD] age 61 [15] years), including six patients with a retinal implant. Psychometric properties were evaluated through Rasch analysis and a revised set (150 items) was administered to 80 participants in Round 2. RESULTS: In Round 1, the person measure distribution (range, 8.6 logits) was centered at −1.50 logits relative to the item measures. In Round 2, the person measure distribution (range, 9.5 logits) was centered at −0.86 relative to the item mean. The reliability index in both rounds was 0.97 for Items and 0.99 for Persons. Infit analysis showed four underfit items in Round 1, five underfit items in Round 2 with a z-score greater than 4 cutoff. Principal component analysis on the residuals found 69.9% explained variance; the largest component in the unexplained variance was less than 3%. CONCLUSIONS: The ULV-VFQ, developed with content generated from a ULV population, showed excellent psychometric properties as well as superior measurement validity in a ULV population. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: The ULV-VFQ, part of the Prosthetic Low Vision Rehabilitation (PLoVR) development program, is a new VFQ developed for assessment of functional vision in ULV populations. The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2017-05-31 /pmc/articles/PMC5450923/ /pubmed/28573075 http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.6.3.11 Text en Copyright 2017 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
spellingShingle Articles
Jeter, Pamela E.
Rozanski, Collin
Massof, Robert
Adeyemo, Olukemi
Dagnelie, Gislin
Development of the Ultra-Low Vision Visual Functioning Questionnaire (ULV-VFQ)
title Development of the Ultra-Low Vision Visual Functioning Questionnaire (ULV-VFQ)
title_full Development of the Ultra-Low Vision Visual Functioning Questionnaire (ULV-VFQ)
title_fullStr Development of the Ultra-Low Vision Visual Functioning Questionnaire (ULV-VFQ)
title_full_unstemmed Development of the Ultra-Low Vision Visual Functioning Questionnaire (ULV-VFQ)
title_short Development of the Ultra-Low Vision Visual Functioning Questionnaire (ULV-VFQ)
title_sort development of the ultra-low vision visual functioning questionnaire (ulv-vfq)
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5450923/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28573075
http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.6.3.11
work_keys_str_mv AT jeterpamelae developmentoftheultralowvisionvisualfunctioningquestionnaireulvvfq
AT rozanskicollin developmentoftheultralowvisionvisualfunctioningquestionnaireulvvfq
AT massofrobert developmentoftheultralowvisionvisualfunctioningquestionnaireulvvfq
AT adeyemoolukemi developmentoftheultralowvisionvisualfunctioningquestionnaireulvvfq
AT dagneliegislin developmentoftheultralowvisionvisualfunctioningquestionnaireulvvfq
AT developmentoftheultralowvisionvisualfunctioningquestionnaireulvvfq