Cargando…
Cecum intubation rate as quality indicator in clinical versus screening colonoscopy
BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS : Some guidelines recommend a minimum standard of 90 % cecal intubation rate (CIR) in routine clinics and 95 % in screening colonoscopy, while others have not made this distinction – both with limited evidence to support either view. This study questions the rationale for m...
Autores principales: | Hoff, Geir, Holme, Øyvind, Bretthauer, Michael, Sandvei, Per, Darre-Næss, Ole, Stallemo, Asbjørn, Wiig, Håvard, Høie, Ole, Noraberg, Geir, Moritz, Volker, de Lange, Thomas |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG
2017
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5451274/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28573182 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-106180 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Gastronet survey on the use of one- or two-person technique for colonoscopy insertion
por: Hoff, Geir, et al.
Publicado: (2011) -
Registration bias in a clinical quality register
por: Hoff, Geir, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
An explorative study from the Norwegian Quality Register Gastronet comparing self-estimated versus registered quality in colonoscopy performance
por: Moritz, Volker, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Colonoscopy quality improvement after initial training: A cross-sectional study of intensive short-term training
por: Schult, Anna Lisa, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Polyp detection rates as quality indicator in clinical versus screening colonoscopy
por: Hoff, G., et al.
Publicado: (2019)