Cargando…

The relation between human hair follicle density and touch perception

Unmyelinated low threshold C-tactile fibers moderate pleasant aspects of touch. These fibers respond optimally to stroking stimulation of the skin with slow velocities (1–10 cm/s). Low threshold mechanoreceptors are arranged around hair follicles in rodent skin. If valid also in humans, hair follicl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jönsson, Emma H., Bendas, Johanna, Weidner, Kerstin, Wessberg, Johan, Olausson, Håkan, Wasling, Helena Backlund, Croy, Ilona
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5451466/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28566678
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-02308-9
_version_ 1783240184388648960
author Jönsson, Emma H.
Bendas, Johanna
Weidner, Kerstin
Wessberg, Johan
Olausson, Håkan
Wasling, Helena Backlund
Croy, Ilona
author_facet Jönsson, Emma H.
Bendas, Johanna
Weidner, Kerstin
Wessberg, Johan
Olausson, Håkan
Wasling, Helena Backlund
Croy, Ilona
author_sort Jönsson, Emma H.
collection PubMed
description Unmyelinated low threshold C-tactile fibers moderate pleasant aspects of touch. These fibers respond optimally to stroking stimulation of the skin with slow velocities (1–10 cm/s). Low threshold mechanoreceptors are arranged around hair follicles in rodent skin. If valid also in humans, hair follicle density (HFD) may relate to the perceived pleasantness of stroking tactile stimulation. We conducted two studies that examined the relation between HFD and affective touch perception in humans. In total, 138 healthy volunteers were stroked on the forearm and rated the pleasantness and intensity. Stimulation was performed by a robotic tactile stimulator delivering C-tactile optimal (1, 3, 10 cm/s) and non-optimal (0.1, 0.3, 30 cm/s) stroking velocities. Additionally, a measure of discriminative touch was applied in study 2. HFD of the same forearm was determined using the Cyanoacrylate Skin Stripping Method (CSSM), which we validated in a pretest. Women had higher HFD than men, which was explained by body size and weight. Furthermore, women rated affective touch stimuli as more pleasant and had higher tactile acuity. Depilation did not affect touch perception. A weak relationship was found between the C-tactile specific aspects of affective touch perception and HFD, and the hypothesis of HFD relating to pleasant aspects of stroking only received weak support.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5451466
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54514662017-06-02 The relation between human hair follicle density and touch perception Jönsson, Emma H. Bendas, Johanna Weidner, Kerstin Wessberg, Johan Olausson, Håkan Wasling, Helena Backlund Croy, Ilona Sci Rep Article Unmyelinated low threshold C-tactile fibers moderate pleasant aspects of touch. These fibers respond optimally to stroking stimulation of the skin with slow velocities (1–10 cm/s). Low threshold mechanoreceptors are arranged around hair follicles in rodent skin. If valid also in humans, hair follicle density (HFD) may relate to the perceived pleasantness of stroking tactile stimulation. We conducted two studies that examined the relation between HFD and affective touch perception in humans. In total, 138 healthy volunteers were stroked on the forearm and rated the pleasantness and intensity. Stimulation was performed by a robotic tactile stimulator delivering C-tactile optimal (1, 3, 10 cm/s) and non-optimal (0.1, 0.3, 30 cm/s) stroking velocities. Additionally, a measure of discriminative touch was applied in study 2. HFD of the same forearm was determined using the Cyanoacrylate Skin Stripping Method (CSSM), which we validated in a pretest. Women had higher HFD than men, which was explained by body size and weight. Furthermore, women rated affective touch stimuli as more pleasant and had higher tactile acuity. Depilation did not affect touch perception. A weak relationship was found between the C-tactile specific aspects of affective touch perception and HFD, and the hypothesis of HFD relating to pleasant aspects of stroking only received weak support. Nature Publishing Group UK 2017-05-31 /pmc/articles/PMC5451466/ /pubmed/28566678 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-02308-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Jönsson, Emma H.
Bendas, Johanna
Weidner, Kerstin
Wessberg, Johan
Olausson, Håkan
Wasling, Helena Backlund
Croy, Ilona
The relation between human hair follicle density and touch perception
title The relation between human hair follicle density and touch perception
title_full The relation between human hair follicle density and touch perception
title_fullStr The relation between human hair follicle density and touch perception
title_full_unstemmed The relation between human hair follicle density and touch perception
title_short The relation between human hair follicle density and touch perception
title_sort relation between human hair follicle density and touch perception
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5451466/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28566678
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-02308-9
work_keys_str_mv AT jonssonemmah therelationbetweenhumanhairfollicledensityandtouchperception
AT bendasjohanna therelationbetweenhumanhairfollicledensityandtouchperception
AT weidnerkerstin therelationbetweenhumanhairfollicledensityandtouchperception
AT wessbergjohan therelationbetweenhumanhairfollicledensityandtouchperception
AT olaussonhakan therelationbetweenhumanhairfollicledensityandtouchperception
AT waslinghelenabacklund therelationbetweenhumanhairfollicledensityandtouchperception
AT croyilona therelationbetweenhumanhairfollicledensityandtouchperception
AT jonssonemmah relationbetweenhumanhairfollicledensityandtouchperception
AT bendasjohanna relationbetweenhumanhairfollicledensityandtouchperception
AT weidnerkerstin relationbetweenhumanhairfollicledensityandtouchperception
AT wessbergjohan relationbetweenhumanhairfollicledensityandtouchperception
AT olaussonhakan relationbetweenhumanhairfollicledensityandtouchperception
AT waslinghelenabacklund relationbetweenhumanhairfollicledensityandtouchperception
AT croyilona relationbetweenhumanhairfollicledensityandtouchperception