Cargando…
The relation between human hair follicle density and touch perception
Unmyelinated low threshold C-tactile fibers moderate pleasant aspects of touch. These fibers respond optimally to stroking stimulation of the skin with slow velocities (1–10 cm/s). Low threshold mechanoreceptors are arranged around hair follicles in rodent skin. If valid also in humans, hair follicl...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5451466/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28566678 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-02308-9 |
_version_ | 1783240184388648960 |
---|---|
author | Jönsson, Emma H. Bendas, Johanna Weidner, Kerstin Wessberg, Johan Olausson, Håkan Wasling, Helena Backlund Croy, Ilona |
author_facet | Jönsson, Emma H. Bendas, Johanna Weidner, Kerstin Wessberg, Johan Olausson, Håkan Wasling, Helena Backlund Croy, Ilona |
author_sort | Jönsson, Emma H. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Unmyelinated low threshold C-tactile fibers moderate pleasant aspects of touch. These fibers respond optimally to stroking stimulation of the skin with slow velocities (1–10 cm/s). Low threshold mechanoreceptors are arranged around hair follicles in rodent skin. If valid also in humans, hair follicle density (HFD) may relate to the perceived pleasantness of stroking tactile stimulation. We conducted two studies that examined the relation between HFD and affective touch perception in humans. In total, 138 healthy volunteers were stroked on the forearm and rated the pleasantness and intensity. Stimulation was performed by a robotic tactile stimulator delivering C-tactile optimal (1, 3, 10 cm/s) and non-optimal (0.1, 0.3, 30 cm/s) stroking velocities. Additionally, a measure of discriminative touch was applied in study 2. HFD of the same forearm was determined using the Cyanoacrylate Skin Stripping Method (CSSM), which we validated in a pretest. Women had higher HFD than men, which was explained by body size and weight. Furthermore, women rated affective touch stimuli as more pleasant and had higher tactile acuity. Depilation did not affect touch perception. A weak relationship was found between the C-tactile specific aspects of affective touch perception and HFD, and the hypothesis of HFD relating to pleasant aspects of stroking only received weak support. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5451466 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54514662017-06-02 The relation between human hair follicle density and touch perception Jönsson, Emma H. Bendas, Johanna Weidner, Kerstin Wessberg, Johan Olausson, Håkan Wasling, Helena Backlund Croy, Ilona Sci Rep Article Unmyelinated low threshold C-tactile fibers moderate pleasant aspects of touch. These fibers respond optimally to stroking stimulation of the skin with slow velocities (1–10 cm/s). Low threshold mechanoreceptors are arranged around hair follicles in rodent skin. If valid also in humans, hair follicle density (HFD) may relate to the perceived pleasantness of stroking tactile stimulation. We conducted two studies that examined the relation between HFD and affective touch perception in humans. In total, 138 healthy volunteers were stroked on the forearm and rated the pleasantness and intensity. Stimulation was performed by a robotic tactile stimulator delivering C-tactile optimal (1, 3, 10 cm/s) and non-optimal (0.1, 0.3, 30 cm/s) stroking velocities. Additionally, a measure of discriminative touch was applied in study 2. HFD of the same forearm was determined using the Cyanoacrylate Skin Stripping Method (CSSM), which we validated in a pretest. Women had higher HFD than men, which was explained by body size and weight. Furthermore, women rated affective touch stimuli as more pleasant and had higher tactile acuity. Depilation did not affect touch perception. A weak relationship was found between the C-tactile specific aspects of affective touch perception and HFD, and the hypothesis of HFD relating to pleasant aspects of stroking only received weak support. Nature Publishing Group UK 2017-05-31 /pmc/articles/PMC5451466/ /pubmed/28566678 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-02308-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Jönsson, Emma H. Bendas, Johanna Weidner, Kerstin Wessberg, Johan Olausson, Håkan Wasling, Helena Backlund Croy, Ilona The relation between human hair follicle density and touch perception |
title | The relation between human hair follicle density and touch perception |
title_full | The relation between human hair follicle density and touch perception |
title_fullStr | The relation between human hair follicle density and touch perception |
title_full_unstemmed | The relation between human hair follicle density and touch perception |
title_short | The relation between human hair follicle density and touch perception |
title_sort | relation between human hair follicle density and touch perception |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5451466/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28566678 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-02308-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jonssonemmah therelationbetweenhumanhairfollicledensityandtouchperception AT bendasjohanna therelationbetweenhumanhairfollicledensityandtouchperception AT weidnerkerstin therelationbetweenhumanhairfollicledensityandtouchperception AT wessbergjohan therelationbetweenhumanhairfollicledensityandtouchperception AT olaussonhakan therelationbetweenhumanhairfollicledensityandtouchperception AT waslinghelenabacklund therelationbetweenhumanhairfollicledensityandtouchperception AT croyilona therelationbetweenhumanhairfollicledensityandtouchperception AT jonssonemmah relationbetweenhumanhairfollicledensityandtouchperception AT bendasjohanna relationbetweenhumanhairfollicledensityandtouchperception AT weidnerkerstin relationbetweenhumanhairfollicledensityandtouchperception AT wessbergjohan relationbetweenhumanhairfollicledensityandtouchperception AT olaussonhakan relationbetweenhumanhairfollicledensityandtouchperception AT waslinghelenabacklund relationbetweenhumanhairfollicledensityandtouchperception AT croyilona relationbetweenhumanhairfollicledensityandtouchperception |