Cargando…
And, not or: Quality, quantity in scientific publishing
Scientists often perceive a trade-off between quantity and quality in scientific publishing: finite amounts of time and effort can be spent to produce few high-quality papers or subdivided to produce many papers of lower quality. Despite this perception, previous studies have indicated the opposite...
Autores principales: | Michalska-Smith, Matthew J., Allesina, Stefano |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5453441/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28570567 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0178074 |
Ejemplares similares
-
With Great Power Comes Great Responsibility: the Importance of Rejection, Power, and Editors in the Practice of Scientific Publishing
por: Lortie, Christopher J., et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
Quantity and/or Quality? The Importance of Publishing Many Papers
por: Sandström, Ulf, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Telling ecological networks apart by their structure: A computational challenge
por: Michalska-Smith, Matthew J., et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
The Scientific Impact of Nations: Journal Placement and Citation Performance
por: Smith, Matthew J., et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
Worldwide trends in quantity and quality of published articles in the field of infectious diseases
por: Bliziotis, Ioannis A, et al.
Publicado: (2005)