Cargando…

Memory for faces and voices varies as a function of sex and expressed emotion

We investigated how memory for faces and voices (presented separately and in combination) varies as a function of sex and emotional expression (anger, disgust, fear, happiness, sadness, and neutral). At encoding, participants judged the expressed emotion of items in forced-choice tasks, followed by...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: S. Cortes, Diana, Laukka, Petri, Lindahl, Christina, Fischer, Håkan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5453523/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28570691
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0178423
_version_ 1783240676084809728
author S. Cortes, Diana
Laukka, Petri
Lindahl, Christina
Fischer, Håkan
author_facet S. Cortes, Diana
Laukka, Petri
Lindahl, Christina
Fischer, Håkan
author_sort S. Cortes, Diana
collection PubMed
description We investigated how memory for faces and voices (presented separately and in combination) varies as a function of sex and emotional expression (anger, disgust, fear, happiness, sadness, and neutral). At encoding, participants judged the expressed emotion of items in forced-choice tasks, followed by incidental Remember/Know recognition tasks. Results from 600 participants showed that accuracy (hits minus false alarms) was consistently higher for neutral compared to emotional items, whereas accuracy for specific emotions varied across the presentation modalities (i.e., faces, voices, and face-voice combinations). For the subjective sense of recollection (“remember” hits), neutral items received the highest hit rates only for faces, whereas for voices and face-voice combinations anger and fear expressions instead received the highest recollection rates. We also observed better accuracy for items by female expressers, and own-sex bias where female participants displayed memory advantage for female faces and face-voice combinations. Results further suggest that own-sex bias can be explained by recollection, rather than familiarity, rates. Overall, results show that memory for faces and voices may be influenced by the expressions that they carry, as well as by the sex of both items and participants. Emotion expressions may also enhance the subjective sense of recollection without enhancing memory accuracy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5453523
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54535232017-06-12 Memory for faces and voices varies as a function of sex and expressed emotion S. Cortes, Diana Laukka, Petri Lindahl, Christina Fischer, Håkan PLoS One Research Article We investigated how memory for faces and voices (presented separately and in combination) varies as a function of sex and emotional expression (anger, disgust, fear, happiness, sadness, and neutral). At encoding, participants judged the expressed emotion of items in forced-choice tasks, followed by incidental Remember/Know recognition tasks. Results from 600 participants showed that accuracy (hits minus false alarms) was consistently higher for neutral compared to emotional items, whereas accuracy for specific emotions varied across the presentation modalities (i.e., faces, voices, and face-voice combinations). For the subjective sense of recollection (“remember” hits), neutral items received the highest hit rates only for faces, whereas for voices and face-voice combinations anger and fear expressions instead received the highest recollection rates. We also observed better accuracy for items by female expressers, and own-sex bias where female participants displayed memory advantage for female faces and face-voice combinations. Results further suggest that own-sex bias can be explained by recollection, rather than familiarity, rates. Overall, results show that memory for faces and voices may be influenced by the expressions that they carry, as well as by the sex of both items and participants. Emotion expressions may also enhance the subjective sense of recollection without enhancing memory accuracy. Public Library of Science 2017-06-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5453523/ /pubmed/28570691 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0178423 Text en © 2017 S. Cortes et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
S. Cortes, Diana
Laukka, Petri
Lindahl, Christina
Fischer, Håkan
Memory for faces and voices varies as a function of sex and expressed emotion
title Memory for faces and voices varies as a function of sex and expressed emotion
title_full Memory for faces and voices varies as a function of sex and expressed emotion
title_fullStr Memory for faces and voices varies as a function of sex and expressed emotion
title_full_unstemmed Memory for faces and voices varies as a function of sex and expressed emotion
title_short Memory for faces and voices varies as a function of sex and expressed emotion
title_sort memory for faces and voices varies as a function of sex and expressed emotion
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5453523/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28570691
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0178423
work_keys_str_mv AT scortesdiana memoryforfacesandvoicesvariesasafunctionofsexandexpressedemotion
AT laukkapetri memoryforfacesandvoicesvariesasafunctionofsexandexpressedemotion
AT lindahlchristina memoryforfacesandvoicesvariesasafunctionofsexandexpressedemotion
AT fischerhakan memoryforfacesandvoicesvariesasafunctionofsexandexpressedemotion