Cargando…
Curated Collections for Educators: Five Key Papers about Program Evaluation
The evaluation of educational programs has become an expected part of medical education. At some point, all medical educators will need to critically evaluate the programs that they deliver. However, the evaluation of educational programs requires a very different skillset than teaching. In this art...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cureus
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5453746/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28589073 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.1224 |
_version_ | 1783240718382268416 |
---|---|
author | Thoma, Brent Gottlieb, Michael Boysen-Osborn, Megan King, Andrew Quinn, Antonia Krzyzaniak, Sara Pineda, Nicolas Yarris, Lalena M Chan, Teresa |
author_facet | Thoma, Brent Gottlieb, Michael Boysen-Osborn, Megan King, Andrew Quinn, Antonia Krzyzaniak, Sara Pineda, Nicolas Yarris, Lalena M Chan, Teresa |
author_sort | Thoma, Brent |
collection | PubMed |
description | The evaluation of educational programs has become an expected part of medical education. At some point, all medical educators will need to critically evaluate the programs that they deliver. However, the evaluation of educational programs requires a very different skillset than teaching. In this article, we aim to identify and summarize key papers that would be helpful for faculty members interested in exploring program evaluation. In November of 2016, the 2015-2016 Academic life in emergency medicine (ALiEM) Faculty Incubator program highlighted key papers in a discussion of program evaluation. This list of papers was augmented with suggestions by guest experts and by an open call on Twitter. This resulted in a list of 30 papers on program evaluation. Our authorship group then engaged in a process akin to a Delphi study to build consensus on the most important papers about program evaluation for medical education faculty. We present our group’s top five most highly rated papers on program evaluation. We also summarize these papers with respect to their relevance to junior medical education faculty members and faculty developers. Program evaluation is challenging. The described papers will be informative for junior faculty members as they aim to design literature-informed evaluations for their educational programs. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5453746 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Cureus |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54537462017-06-06 Curated Collections for Educators: Five Key Papers about Program Evaluation Thoma, Brent Gottlieb, Michael Boysen-Osborn, Megan King, Andrew Quinn, Antonia Krzyzaniak, Sara Pineda, Nicolas Yarris, Lalena M Chan, Teresa Cureus Medical Education The evaluation of educational programs has become an expected part of medical education. At some point, all medical educators will need to critically evaluate the programs that they deliver. However, the evaluation of educational programs requires a very different skillset than teaching. In this article, we aim to identify and summarize key papers that would be helpful for faculty members interested in exploring program evaluation. In November of 2016, the 2015-2016 Academic life in emergency medicine (ALiEM) Faculty Incubator program highlighted key papers in a discussion of program evaluation. This list of papers was augmented with suggestions by guest experts and by an open call on Twitter. This resulted in a list of 30 papers on program evaluation. Our authorship group then engaged in a process akin to a Delphi study to build consensus on the most important papers about program evaluation for medical education faculty. We present our group’s top five most highly rated papers on program evaluation. We also summarize these papers with respect to their relevance to junior medical education faculty members and faculty developers. Program evaluation is challenging. The described papers will be informative for junior faculty members as they aim to design literature-informed evaluations for their educational programs. Cureus 2017-05-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5453746/ /pubmed/28589073 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.1224 Text en Copyright © 2017, Thoma et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Medical Education Thoma, Brent Gottlieb, Michael Boysen-Osborn, Megan King, Andrew Quinn, Antonia Krzyzaniak, Sara Pineda, Nicolas Yarris, Lalena M Chan, Teresa Curated Collections for Educators: Five Key Papers about Program Evaluation |
title | Curated Collections for Educators: Five Key Papers about Program Evaluation |
title_full | Curated Collections for Educators: Five Key Papers about Program Evaluation |
title_fullStr | Curated Collections for Educators: Five Key Papers about Program Evaluation |
title_full_unstemmed | Curated Collections for Educators: Five Key Papers about Program Evaluation |
title_short | Curated Collections for Educators: Five Key Papers about Program Evaluation |
title_sort | curated collections for educators: five key papers about program evaluation |
topic | Medical Education |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5453746/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28589073 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.1224 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT thomabrent curatedcollectionsforeducatorsfivekeypapersaboutprogramevaluation AT gottliebmichael curatedcollectionsforeducatorsfivekeypapersaboutprogramevaluation AT boysenosbornmegan curatedcollectionsforeducatorsfivekeypapersaboutprogramevaluation AT kingandrew curatedcollectionsforeducatorsfivekeypapersaboutprogramevaluation AT quinnantonia curatedcollectionsforeducatorsfivekeypapersaboutprogramevaluation AT krzyzaniaksara curatedcollectionsforeducatorsfivekeypapersaboutprogramevaluation AT pinedanicolas curatedcollectionsforeducatorsfivekeypapersaboutprogramevaluation AT yarrislalenam curatedcollectionsforeducatorsfivekeypapersaboutprogramevaluation AT chanteresa curatedcollectionsforeducatorsfivekeypapersaboutprogramevaluation |