Cargando…

Curated Collections for Educators: Five Key Papers about Program Evaluation

The evaluation of educational programs has become an expected part of medical education. At some point, all medical educators will need to critically evaluate the programs that they deliver. However, the evaluation of educational programs requires a very different skillset than teaching. In this art...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Thoma, Brent, Gottlieb, Michael, Boysen-Osborn, Megan, King, Andrew, Quinn, Antonia, Krzyzaniak, Sara, Pineda, Nicolas, Yarris, Lalena M, Chan, Teresa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5453746/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28589073
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.1224
_version_ 1783240718382268416
author Thoma, Brent
Gottlieb, Michael
Boysen-Osborn, Megan
King, Andrew
Quinn, Antonia
Krzyzaniak, Sara
Pineda, Nicolas
Yarris, Lalena M
Chan, Teresa
author_facet Thoma, Brent
Gottlieb, Michael
Boysen-Osborn, Megan
King, Andrew
Quinn, Antonia
Krzyzaniak, Sara
Pineda, Nicolas
Yarris, Lalena M
Chan, Teresa
author_sort Thoma, Brent
collection PubMed
description The evaluation of educational programs has become an expected part of medical education. At some point, all medical educators will need to critically evaluate the programs that they deliver. However, the evaluation of educational programs requires a very different skillset than teaching. In this article, we aim to identify and summarize key papers that would be helpful for faculty members interested in exploring program evaluation. In November of 2016, the 2015-2016 Academic life in emergency medicine (ALiEM) Faculty Incubator program highlighted key papers in a discussion of program evaluation. This list of papers was augmented with suggestions by guest experts and by an open call on Twitter. This resulted in a list of 30 papers on program evaluation. Our authorship group then engaged in a process akin to a Delphi study to build consensus on the most important papers about program evaluation for medical education faculty. We present our group’s top five most highly rated papers on program evaluation. We also summarize these papers with respect to their relevance to junior medical education faculty members and faculty developers. Program evaluation is challenging. The described papers will be informative for junior faculty members as they aim to design literature-informed evaluations for their educational programs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5453746
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54537462017-06-06 Curated Collections for Educators: Five Key Papers about Program Evaluation Thoma, Brent Gottlieb, Michael Boysen-Osborn, Megan King, Andrew Quinn, Antonia Krzyzaniak, Sara Pineda, Nicolas Yarris, Lalena M Chan, Teresa Cureus Medical Education The evaluation of educational programs has become an expected part of medical education. At some point, all medical educators will need to critically evaluate the programs that they deliver. However, the evaluation of educational programs requires a very different skillset than teaching. In this article, we aim to identify and summarize key papers that would be helpful for faculty members interested in exploring program evaluation. In November of 2016, the 2015-2016 Academic life in emergency medicine (ALiEM) Faculty Incubator program highlighted key papers in a discussion of program evaluation. This list of papers was augmented with suggestions by guest experts and by an open call on Twitter. This resulted in a list of 30 papers on program evaluation. Our authorship group then engaged in a process akin to a Delphi study to build consensus on the most important papers about program evaluation for medical education faculty. We present our group’s top five most highly rated papers on program evaluation. We also summarize these papers with respect to their relevance to junior medical education faculty members and faculty developers. Program evaluation is challenging. The described papers will be informative for junior faculty members as they aim to design literature-informed evaluations for their educational programs. Cureus 2017-05-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5453746/ /pubmed/28589073 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.1224 Text en Copyright © 2017, Thoma et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Medical Education
Thoma, Brent
Gottlieb, Michael
Boysen-Osborn, Megan
King, Andrew
Quinn, Antonia
Krzyzaniak, Sara
Pineda, Nicolas
Yarris, Lalena M
Chan, Teresa
Curated Collections for Educators: Five Key Papers about Program Evaluation
title Curated Collections for Educators: Five Key Papers about Program Evaluation
title_full Curated Collections for Educators: Five Key Papers about Program Evaluation
title_fullStr Curated Collections for Educators: Five Key Papers about Program Evaluation
title_full_unstemmed Curated Collections for Educators: Five Key Papers about Program Evaluation
title_short Curated Collections for Educators: Five Key Papers about Program Evaluation
title_sort curated collections for educators: five key papers about program evaluation
topic Medical Education
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5453746/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28589073
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.1224
work_keys_str_mv AT thomabrent curatedcollectionsforeducatorsfivekeypapersaboutprogramevaluation
AT gottliebmichael curatedcollectionsforeducatorsfivekeypapersaboutprogramevaluation
AT boysenosbornmegan curatedcollectionsforeducatorsfivekeypapersaboutprogramevaluation
AT kingandrew curatedcollectionsforeducatorsfivekeypapersaboutprogramevaluation
AT quinnantonia curatedcollectionsforeducatorsfivekeypapersaboutprogramevaluation
AT krzyzaniaksara curatedcollectionsforeducatorsfivekeypapersaboutprogramevaluation
AT pinedanicolas curatedcollectionsforeducatorsfivekeypapersaboutprogramevaluation
AT yarrislalenam curatedcollectionsforeducatorsfivekeypapersaboutprogramevaluation
AT chanteresa curatedcollectionsforeducatorsfivekeypapersaboutprogramevaluation