Cargando…

Is HATCH score a reliable predictor of atrial fibrillation after cavotricuspid isthmus ablation for typical atrial flutter?

OBJECTIVE: We determined the effectiveness of the HATCH score in patients with typical atrial flutter (AFl) undergoing cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) ablation to predict long-term atrial fibrillation (AF). METHODS: We conducted an observational retrospective single-center cohort study including all pat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: García-Seara, Javier, Gude Sampedro, Francisco, Martínez Sande, Jose L., Fernández López, Xesus Alberte, Rodríguez Mañero, Moisés, González Melchor, Laila, Alvarez Alvarez, Belén, Iglesias Alvarez, Diego, González Juanatey, José Ramón
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5454134/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28616550
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcha.2016.05.006
_version_ 1783240782164000768
author García-Seara, Javier
Gude Sampedro, Francisco
Martínez Sande, Jose L.
Fernández López, Xesus Alberte
Rodríguez Mañero, Moisés
González Melchor, Laila
Alvarez Alvarez, Belén
Iglesias Alvarez, Diego
González Juanatey, José Ramón
author_facet García-Seara, Javier
Gude Sampedro, Francisco
Martínez Sande, Jose L.
Fernández López, Xesus Alberte
Rodríguez Mañero, Moisés
González Melchor, Laila
Alvarez Alvarez, Belén
Iglesias Alvarez, Diego
González Juanatey, José Ramón
author_sort García-Seara, Javier
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: We determined the effectiveness of the HATCH score in patients with typical atrial flutter (AFl) undergoing cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) ablation to predict long-term atrial fibrillation (AF). METHODS: We conducted an observational retrospective single-center cohort study including all patients admitted to our hospital for a CTI ablation between 1998 and 2010. The patients were divided into four categories: 1) new-onset AF (no prior AF and AF during follow-up (FU)); 2) old AF (prior AF and no AF during FU); 3) prior and post AF (AF prior and post CTI ablation); and 4) no AF. RESULTS: Four hundred and eight patients were included. In patients without prior AF, the hazard ratio (HR) for new-onset AF during FU was 0.98 (CI 95%: 0.65–1.50; p = 0.95) and 1.00 (CI 95%: 0.57–1.77; p = 0.98) for HATCH ≥ 2 and HATCH ≥ 3, respectively. In patients with prior AF, the HR for AF was 1.41 (CI 95%: 0.87–2.28; p = 0.17) and 1.79 (CI 95%: 0.96–3.35; p = 0.06), for HATCH ≥ 2 and HATCH ≥ 3, respectively. Left atrial enlargement was positively correlated with the occurrence of AF during FU, especially in the subgroup without prior AF, which had a HR of 2.44 (CI 95%: 1.35–4.40; p = 0.003), a HR of 2.88 (CI 95%: 1.36–6.10; p = 0.006) and a HR of 3.68 (CI 95%: 1.71–7.94; p = 0.001), for slight, moderate and severely dilated left atrial dimension, respectively, compared with a normal value. CONCLUSIONS: HATCH score did not predict AF in patients with typical AFl who underwent CTI ablation. Basal left atrium dimension could help predict new-onset AF.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5454134
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54541342017-06-14 Is HATCH score a reliable predictor of atrial fibrillation after cavotricuspid isthmus ablation for typical atrial flutter? García-Seara, Javier Gude Sampedro, Francisco Martínez Sande, Jose L. Fernández López, Xesus Alberte Rodríguez Mañero, Moisés González Melchor, Laila Alvarez Alvarez, Belén Iglesias Alvarez, Diego González Juanatey, José Ramón Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc Article OBJECTIVE: We determined the effectiveness of the HATCH score in patients with typical atrial flutter (AFl) undergoing cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) ablation to predict long-term atrial fibrillation (AF). METHODS: We conducted an observational retrospective single-center cohort study including all patients admitted to our hospital for a CTI ablation between 1998 and 2010. The patients were divided into four categories: 1) new-onset AF (no prior AF and AF during follow-up (FU)); 2) old AF (prior AF and no AF during FU); 3) prior and post AF (AF prior and post CTI ablation); and 4) no AF. RESULTS: Four hundred and eight patients were included. In patients without prior AF, the hazard ratio (HR) for new-onset AF during FU was 0.98 (CI 95%: 0.65–1.50; p = 0.95) and 1.00 (CI 95%: 0.57–1.77; p = 0.98) for HATCH ≥ 2 and HATCH ≥ 3, respectively. In patients with prior AF, the HR for AF was 1.41 (CI 95%: 0.87–2.28; p = 0.17) and 1.79 (CI 95%: 0.96–3.35; p = 0.06), for HATCH ≥ 2 and HATCH ≥ 3, respectively. Left atrial enlargement was positively correlated with the occurrence of AF during FU, especially in the subgroup without prior AF, which had a HR of 2.44 (CI 95%: 1.35–4.40; p = 0.003), a HR of 2.88 (CI 95%: 1.36–6.10; p = 0.006) and a HR of 3.68 (CI 95%: 1.71–7.94; p = 0.001), for slight, moderate and severely dilated left atrial dimension, respectively, compared with a normal value. CONCLUSIONS: HATCH score did not predict AF in patients with typical AFl who underwent CTI ablation. Basal left atrium dimension could help predict new-onset AF. Elsevier 2016-06-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5454134/ /pubmed/28616550 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcha.2016.05.006 Text en © 2016 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
García-Seara, Javier
Gude Sampedro, Francisco
Martínez Sande, Jose L.
Fernández López, Xesus Alberte
Rodríguez Mañero, Moisés
González Melchor, Laila
Alvarez Alvarez, Belén
Iglesias Alvarez, Diego
González Juanatey, José Ramón
Is HATCH score a reliable predictor of atrial fibrillation after cavotricuspid isthmus ablation for typical atrial flutter?
title Is HATCH score a reliable predictor of atrial fibrillation after cavotricuspid isthmus ablation for typical atrial flutter?
title_full Is HATCH score a reliable predictor of atrial fibrillation after cavotricuspid isthmus ablation for typical atrial flutter?
title_fullStr Is HATCH score a reliable predictor of atrial fibrillation after cavotricuspid isthmus ablation for typical atrial flutter?
title_full_unstemmed Is HATCH score a reliable predictor of atrial fibrillation after cavotricuspid isthmus ablation for typical atrial flutter?
title_short Is HATCH score a reliable predictor of atrial fibrillation after cavotricuspid isthmus ablation for typical atrial flutter?
title_sort is hatch score a reliable predictor of atrial fibrillation after cavotricuspid isthmus ablation for typical atrial flutter?
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5454134/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28616550
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcha.2016.05.006
work_keys_str_mv AT garciasearajavier ishatchscoreareliablepredictorofatrialfibrillationaftercavotricuspidisthmusablationfortypicalatrialflutter
AT gudesampedrofrancisco ishatchscoreareliablepredictorofatrialfibrillationaftercavotricuspidisthmusablationfortypicalatrialflutter
AT martinezsandejosel ishatchscoreareliablepredictorofatrialfibrillationaftercavotricuspidisthmusablationfortypicalatrialflutter
AT fernandezlopezxesusalberte ishatchscoreareliablepredictorofatrialfibrillationaftercavotricuspidisthmusablationfortypicalatrialflutter
AT rodriguezmaneromoises ishatchscoreareliablepredictorofatrialfibrillationaftercavotricuspidisthmusablationfortypicalatrialflutter
AT gonzalezmelchorlaila ishatchscoreareliablepredictorofatrialfibrillationaftercavotricuspidisthmusablationfortypicalatrialflutter
AT alvarezalvarezbelen ishatchscoreareliablepredictorofatrialfibrillationaftercavotricuspidisthmusablationfortypicalatrialflutter
AT iglesiasalvarezdiego ishatchscoreareliablepredictorofatrialfibrillationaftercavotricuspidisthmusablationfortypicalatrialflutter
AT gonzalezjuanateyjoseramon ishatchscoreareliablepredictorofatrialfibrillationaftercavotricuspidisthmusablationfortypicalatrialflutter