Cargando…
Is HATCH score a reliable predictor of atrial fibrillation after cavotricuspid isthmus ablation for typical atrial flutter?
OBJECTIVE: We determined the effectiveness of the HATCH score in patients with typical atrial flutter (AFl) undergoing cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) ablation to predict long-term atrial fibrillation (AF). METHODS: We conducted an observational retrospective single-center cohort study including all pat...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5454134/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28616550 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcha.2016.05.006 |
_version_ | 1783240782164000768 |
---|---|
author | García-Seara, Javier Gude Sampedro, Francisco Martínez Sande, Jose L. Fernández López, Xesus Alberte Rodríguez Mañero, Moisés González Melchor, Laila Alvarez Alvarez, Belén Iglesias Alvarez, Diego González Juanatey, José Ramón |
author_facet | García-Seara, Javier Gude Sampedro, Francisco Martínez Sande, Jose L. Fernández López, Xesus Alberte Rodríguez Mañero, Moisés González Melchor, Laila Alvarez Alvarez, Belén Iglesias Alvarez, Diego González Juanatey, José Ramón |
author_sort | García-Seara, Javier |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: We determined the effectiveness of the HATCH score in patients with typical atrial flutter (AFl) undergoing cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) ablation to predict long-term atrial fibrillation (AF). METHODS: We conducted an observational retrospective single-center cohort study including all patients admitted to our hospital for a CTI ablation between 1998 and 2010. The patients were divided into four categories: 1) new-onset AF (no prior AF and AF during follow-up (FU)); 2) old AF (prior AF and no AF during FU); 3) prior and post AF (AF prior and post CTI ablation); and 4) no AF. RESULTS: Four hundred and eight patients were included. In patients without prior AF, the hazard ratio (HR) for new-onset AF during FU was 0.98 (CI 95%: 0.65–1.50; p = 0.95) and 1.00 (CI 95%: 0.57–1.77; p = 0.98) for HATCH ≥ 2 and HATCH ≥ 3, respectively. In patients with prior AF, the HR for AF was 1.41 (CI 95%: 0.87–2.28; p = 0.17) and 1.79 (CI 95%: 0.96–3.35; p = 0.06), for HATCH ≥ 2 and HATCH ≥ 3, respectively. Left atrial enlargement was positively correlated with the occurrence of AF during FU, especially in the subgroup without prior AF, which had a HR of 2.44 (CI 95%: 1.35–4.40; p = 0.003), a HR of 2.88 (CI 95%: 1.36–6.10; p = 0.006) and a HR of 3.68 (CI 95%: 1.71–7.94; p = 0.001), for slight, moderate and severely dilated left atrial dimension, respectively, compared with a normal value. CONCLUSIONS: HATCH score did not predict AF in patients with typical AFl who underwent CTI ablation. Basal left atrium dimension could help predict new-onset AF. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5454134 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54541342017-06-14 Is HATCH score a reliable predictor of atrial fibrillation after cavotricuspid isthmus ablation for typical atrial flutter? García-Seara, Javier Gude Sampedro, Francisco Martínez Sande, Jose L. Fernández López, Xesus Alberte Rodríguez Mañero, Moisés González Melchor, Laila Alvarez Alvarez, Belén Iglesias Alvarez, Diego González Juanatey, José Ramón Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc Article OBJECTIVE: We determined the effectiveness of the HATCH score in patients with typical atrial flutter (AFl) undergoing cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) ablation to predict long-term atrial fibrillation (AF). METHODS: We conducted an observational retrospective single-center cohort study including all patients admitted to our hospital for a CTI ablation between 1998 and 2010. The patients were divided into four categories: 1) new-onset AF (no prior AF and AF during follow-up (FU)); 2) old AF (prior AF and no AF during FU); 3) prior and post AF (AF prior and post CTI ablation); and 4) no AF. RESULTS: Four hundred and eight patients were included. In patients without prior AF, the hazard ratio (HR) for new-onset AF during FU was 0.98 (CI 95%: 0.65–1.50; p = 0.95) and 1.00 (CI 95%: 0.57–1.77; p = 0.98) for HATCH ≥ 2 and HATCH ≥ 3, respectively. In patients with prior AF, the HR for AF was 1.41 (CI 95%: 0.87–2.28; p = 0.17) and 1.79 (CI 95%: 0.96–3.35; p = 0.06), for HATCH ≥ 2 and HATCH ≥ 3, respectively. Left atrial enlargement was positively correlated with the occurrence of AF during FU, especially in the subgroup without prior AF, which had a HR of 2.44 (CI 95%: 1.35–4.40; p = 0.003), a HR of 2.88 (CI 95%: 1.36–6.10; p = 0.006) and a HR of 3.68 (CI 95%: 1.71–7.94; p = 0.001), for slight, moderate and severely dilated left atrial dimension, respectively, compared with a normal value. CONCLUSIONS: HATCH score did not predict AF in patients with typical AFl who underwent CTI ablation. Basal left atrium dimension could help predict new-onset AF. Elsevier 2016-06-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5454134/ /pubmed/28616550 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcha.2016.05.006 Text en © 2016 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article García-Seara, Javier Gude Sampedro, Francisco Martínez Sande, Jose L. Fernández López, Xesus Alberte Rodríguez Mañero, Moisés González Melchor, Laila Alvarez Alvarez, Belén Iglesias Alvarez, Diego González Juanatey, José Ramón Is HATCH score a reliable predictor of atrial fibrillation after cavotricuspid isthmus ablation for typical atrial flutter? |
title | Is HATCH score a reliable predictor of atrial fibrillation after cavotricuspid isthmus ablation for typical atrial flutter? |
title_full | Is HATCH score a reliable predictor of atrial fibrillation after cavotricuspid isthmus ablation for typical atrial flutter? |
title_fullStr | Is HATCH score a reliable predictor of atrial fibrillation after cavotricuspid isthmus ablation for typical atrial flutter? |
title_full_unstemmed | Is HATCH score a reliable predictor of atrial fibrillation after cavotricuspid isthmus ablation for typical atrial flutter? |
title_short | Is HATCH score a reliable predictor of atrial fibrillation after cavotricuspid isthmus ablation for typical atrial flutter? |
title_sort | is hatch score a reliable predictor of atrial fibrillation after cavotricuspid isthmus ablation for typical atrial flutter? |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5454134/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28616550 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcha.2016.05.006 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT garciasearajavier ishatchscoreareliablepredictorofatrialfibrillationaftercavotricuspidisthmusablationfortypicalatrialflutter AT gudesampedrofrancisco ishatchscoreareliablepredictorofatrialfibrillationaftercavotricuspidisthmusablationfortypicalatrialflutter AT martinezsandejosel ishatchscoreareliablepredictorofatrialfibrillationaftercavotricuspidisthmusablationfortypicalatrialflutter AT fernandezlopezxesusalberte ishatchscoreareliablepredictorofatrialfibrillationaftercavotricuspidisthmusablationfortypicalatrialflutter AT rodriguezmaneromoises ishatchscoreareliablepredictorofatrialfibrillationaftercavotricuspidisthmusablationfortypicalatrialflutter AT gonzalezmelchorlaila ishatchscoreareliablepredictorofatrialfibrillationaftercavotricuspidisthmusablationfortypicalatrialflutter AT alvarezalvarezbelen ishatchscoreareliablepredictorofatrialfibrillationaftercavotricuspidisthmusablationfortypicalatrialflutter AT iglesiasalvarezdiego ishatchscoreareliablepredictorofatrialfibrillationaftercavotricuspidisthmusablationfortypicalatrialflutter AT gonzalezjuanateyjoseramon ishatchscoreareliablepredictorofatrialfibrillationaftercavotricuspidisthmusablationfortypicalatrialflutter |