Cargando…
Accuracy of quantitative echocardiographic measures of right ventricular function as compared to cardiovascular magnetic resonance
BACKGROUND: Many echocardiographic parameters have been proposed to evaluate right ventricular (RV) systolic function. We comprehensively assessed a wide range of quantitative echocardiographic parameters in a single cohort compared with same-day cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR). METHODS AND...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5454157/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28616541 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcha.2016.05.007 |
_version_ | 1783240787824214016 |
---|---|
author | Hamilton-Craig, Christian R. Stedman, Kathy Maxwell, Ryan Anderson, Bonita Stanton, Tony Chan, Jonathan Yamada, Akira Scalia, Gregory M. Burstow, Darryl J. |
author_facet | Hamilton-Craig, Christian R. Stedman, Kathy Maxwell, Ryan Anderson, Bonita Stanton, Tony Chan, Jonathan Yamada, Akira Scalia, Gregory M. Burstow, Darryl J. |
author_sort | Hamilton-Craig, Christian R. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Many echocardiographic parameters have been proposed to evaluate right ventricular (RV) systolic function. We comprehensively assessed a wide range of quantitative echocardiographic parameters in a single cohort compared with same-day cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR). METHODS AND RESULTS: 92 subjects were examined prospectively: Group 1 consisted of 46 healthy controls (21 males, 33.4 ± 11.4 years), Group 2 consisted of 46 patients (20 males, 38.5 ± 18.9 years) undergoing RV functional assessment by CMR (1.5 T). Echocardiography was performed on the same day as CMR; fractional area change (RVFAC), myocardial performance index via spectral Doppler (RVMPI), RVMPI via Doppler tissue imaging (RVMPI-DTI), peak systolic myocardial velocity by DTI (RVSm), tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE), speckle tracking strain, and three dimensional right ventricular ejection fraction (3DE-RV). Linear regression, Bland–Altman and receiver-operator-characteristic (ROC) analyses were performed. At ROC analysis, the most predictive echocardiographic methods were; RVFAC (AUC = 0.892), RVMPI (AUC 0.785), TAPSE (AUC 0.849) and 3DE-RV (AUC 0.909). 3DE-RV appeared the most accurate compared to CMR, although underestimated true RV volumes. CONCLUSION: As compared to CMR; 3DE-RV, RVFAC, TAPSE and RVMPI were the most reliable predictors of RV function. These parameters can be recommended for clinical use. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5454157 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54541572017-06-14 Accuracy of quantitative echocardiographic measures of right ventricular function as compared to cardiovascular magnetic resonance Hamilton-Craig, Christian R. Stedman, Kathy Maxwell, Ryan Anderson, Bonita Stanton, Tony Chan, Jonathan Yamada, Akira Scalia, Gregory M. Burstow, Darryl J. Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc Article BACKGROUND: Many echocardiographic parameters have been proposed to evaluate right ventricular (RV) systolic function. We comprehensively assessed a wide range of quantitative echocardiographic parameters in a single cohort compared with same-day cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR). METHODS AND RESULTS: 92 subjects were examined prospectively: Group 1 consisted of 46 healthy controls (21 males, 33.4 ± 11.4 years), Group 2 consisted of 46 patients (20 males, 38.5 ± 18.9 years) undergoing RV functional assessment by CMR (1.5 T). Echocardiography was performed on the same day as CMR; fractional area change (RVFAC), myocardial performance index via spectral Doppler (RVMPI), RVMPI via Doppler tissue imaging (RVMPI-DTI), peak systolic myocardial velocity by DTI (RVSm), tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE), speckle tracking strain, and three dimensional right ventricular ejection fraction (3DE-RV). Linear regression, Bland–Altman and receiver-operator-characteristic (ROC) analyses were performed. At ROC analysis, the most predictive echocardiographic methods were; RVFAC (AUC = 0.892), RVMPI (AUC 0.785), TAPSE (AUC 0.849) and 3DE-RV (AUC 0.909). 3DE-RV appeared the most accurate compared to CMR, although underestimated true RV volumes. CONCLUSION: As compared to CMR; 3DE-RV, RVFAC, TAPSE and RVMPI were the most reliable predictors of RV function. These parameters can be recommended for clinical use. Elsevier 2016-06-23 /pmc/articles/PMC5454157/ /pubmed/28616541 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcha.2016.05.007 Text en Crown Copyright © 2016 Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Hamilton-Craig, Christian R. Stedman, Kathy Maxwell, Ryan Anderson, Bonita Stanton, Tony Chan, Jonathan Yamada, Akira Scalia, Gregory M. Burstow, Darryl J. Accuracy of quantitative echocardiographic measures of right ventricular function as compared to cardiovascular magnetic resonance |
title | Accuracy of quantitative echocardiographic measures of right ventricular function as compared to cardiovascular magnetic resonance |
title_full | Accuracy of quantitative echocardiographic measures of right ventricular function as compared to cardiovascular magnetic resonance |
title_fullStr | Accuracy of quantitative echocardiographic measures of right ventricular function as compared to cardiovascular magnetic resonance |
title_full_unstemmed | Accuracy of quantitative echocardiographic measures of right ventricular function as compared to cardiovascular magnetic resonance |
title_short | Accuracy of quantitative echocardiographic measures of right ventricular function as compared to cardiovascular magnetic resonance |
title_sort | accuracy of quantitative echocardiographic measures of right ventricular function as compared to cardiovascular magnetic resonance |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5454157/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28616541 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcha.2016.05.007 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hamiltoncraigchristianr accuracyofquantitativeechocardiographicmeasuresofrightventricularfunctionascomparedtocardiovascularmagneticresonance AT stedmankathy accuracyofquantitativeechocardiographicmeasuresofrightventricularfunctionascomparedtocardiovascularmagneticresonance AT maxwellryan accuracyofquantitativeechocardiographicmeasuresofrightventricularfunctionascomparedtocardiovascularmagneticresonance AT andersonbonita accuracyofquantitativeechocardiographicmeasuresofrightventricularfunctionascomparedtocardiovascularmagneticresonance AT stantontony accuracyofquantitativeechocardiographicmeasuresofrightventricularfunctionascomparedtocardiovascularmagneticresonance AT chanjonathan accuracyofquantitativeechocardiographicmeasuresofrightventricularfunctionascomparedtocardiovascularmagneticresonance AT yamadaakira accuracyofquantitativeechocardiographicmeasuresofrightventricularfunctionascomparedtocardiovascularmagneticresonance AT scaliagregorym accuracyofquantitativeechocardiographicmeasuresofrightventricularfunctionascomparedtocardiovascularmagneticresonance AT burstowdarrylj accuracyofquantitativeechocardiographicmeasuresofrightventricularfunctionascomparedtocardiovascularmagneticresonance |