Cargando…

Comparison of treatment techniques for reduction in the submandibular gland dose: A retrospective study

INTRODUCTION: Recent studies have suggested reducing the dose submandibular glands receive when patients undergo head and neck radiotherapy can play a crucial role in preventing xerostomia. However, they are traditionally not spared due to concern that target coverage may be compromised. We investig...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hoyne, Christopher, Dreosti, Marcus, Shakeshaft, John, Baxi, Siddartha
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5454328/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28240447
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.203
_version_ 1783240814431830016
author Hoyne, Christopher
Dreosti, Marcus
Shakeshaft, John
Baxi, Siddartha
author_facet Hoyne, Christopher
Dreosti, Marcus
Shakeshaft, John
Baxi, Siddartha
author_sort Hoyne, Christopher
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Recent studies have suggested reducing the dose submandibular glands receive when patients undergo head and neck radiotherapy can play a crucial role in preventing xerostomia. However, they are traditionally not spared due to concern that target coverage may be compromised. We investigated the possibility of sparing the contralateral submandibular gland (cSM) by utilising modern planning techniques. METHODS: 10 head and neck patients previously treated with conformal therapy at our centre were retrospectively planned using intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). Each patient was prescribed 70 Gy in 35 fractions to the primary volume, with 56 Gy delivered to the elective nodal areas. The primary objective was to spare the cSM gland using appropriate dose constraints. RESULTS: Mean dose to the cSM gland was reduced to an acceptable dose level (39 Gy) for all patients replanned using an IMRT or VMAT technique, without compromising planned target volume (PTV) coverage or other critical structures. VMAT was able to reduce the mean dose to 31.5 ± 5.5 Gy compared to 34.5 ± 4.8 Gy of IMRT and offered improved plan conformity. CONCLUSION: Sparing the cSM gland is possible using IMRT and VMAT planning, whilst preserving coverage on the elective PTV. This has produced a change in protocol in our department, more focus placed on sparing the SM glands. VMAT is a viable alternative method of delivering treatment and will be utilised when required.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5454328
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54543282017-06-06 Comparison of treatment techniques for reduction in the submandibular gland dose: A retrospective study Hoyne, Christopher Dreosti, Marcus Shakeshaft, John Baxi, Siddartha J Med Radiat Sci Original Articles INTRODUCTION: Recent studies have suggested reducing the dose submandibular glands receive when patients undergo head and neck radiotherapy can play a crucial role in preventing xerostomia. However, they are traditionally not spared due to concern that target coverage may be compromised. We investigated the possibility of sparing the contralateral submandibular gland (cSM) by utilising modern planning techniques. METHODS: 10 head and neck patients previously treated with conformal therapy at our centre were retrospectively planned using intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). Each patient was prescribed 70 Gy in 35 fractions to the primary volume, with 56 Gy delivered to the elective nodal areas. The primary objective was to spare the cSM gland using appropriate dose constraints. RESULTS: Mean dose to the cSM gland was reduced to an acceptable dose level (39 Gy) for all patients replanned using an IMRT or VMAT technique, without compromising planned target volume (PTV) coverage or other critical structures. VMAT was able to reduce the mean dose to 31.5 ± 5.5 Gy compared to 34.5 ± 4.8 Gy of IMRT and offered improved plan conformity. CONCLUSION: Sparing the cSM gland is possible using IMRT and VMAT planning, whilst preserving coverage on the elective PTV. This has produced a change in protocol in our department, more focus placed on sparing the SM glands. VMAT is a viable alternative method of delivering treatment and will be utilised when required. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-02-27 2017-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5454328/ /pubmed/28240447 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.203 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Australian Society of Medical Imaging and Radiation Therapy and New Zealand Institute of Medical Radiation Technology. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial‐NoDerivs (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Hoyne, Christopher
Dreosti, Marcus
Shakeshaft, John
Baxi, Siddartha
Comparison of treatment techniques for reduction in the submandibular gland dose: A retrospective study
title Comparison of treatment techniques for reduction in the submandibular gland dose: A retrospective study
title_full Comparison of treatment techniques for reduction in the submandibular gland dose: A retrospective study
title_fullStr Comparison of treatment techniques for reduction in the submandibular gland dose: A retrospective study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of treatment techniques for reduction in the submandibular gland dose: A retrospective study
title_short Comparison of treatment techniques for reduction in the submandibular gland dose: A retrospective study
title_sort comparison of treatment techniques for reduction in the submandibular gland dose: a retrospective study
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5454328/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28240447
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.203
work_keys_str_mv AT hoynechristopher comparisonoftreatmenttechniquesforreductioninthesubmandibularglanddosearetrospectivestudy
AT dreostimarcus comparisonoftreatmenttechniquesforreductioninthesubmandibularglanddosearetrospectivestudy
AT shakeshaftjohn comparisonoftreatmenttechniquesforreductioninthesubmandibularglanddosearetrospectivestudy
AT baxisiddartha comparisonoftreatmenttechniquesforreductioninthesubmandibularglanddosearetrospectivestudy