Cargando…

Validated Smartphone-Based Apps for Ear and Hearing Assessments: A Review

BACKGROUND: An estimated 360 million people have a disabling hearing impairment globally, the vast majority of whom live in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Early identification through screening is important to negate the negative effects of untreated hearing impairment. Substantial barrie...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bright, Tess, Pallawela, Danuk
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5454564/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28582261
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/rehab.6074
_version_ 1783240851355336704
author Bright, Tess
Pallawela, Danuk
author_facet Bright, Tess
Pallawela, Danuk
author_sort Bright, Tess
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: An estimated 360 million people have a disabling hearing impairment globally, the vast majority of whom live in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Early identification through screening is important to negate the negative effects of untreated hearing impairment. Substantial barriers exist in screening for hearing impairment in LMICs, such as the requirement for skilled hearing health care professionals and prohibitively expensive specialist equipment to measure hearing. These challenges may be overcome through utilization of increasingly available smartphone app technologies for ear and hearing assessments that are easy to use by unskilled professionals. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to identify and compare available apps for ear and hearing assessments and consider the incorporation of such apps into hearing screening programs METHODS: In July 2015, the commercial app stores Google Play and Apple App Store were searched to identify apps for ear and hearing assessments. Thereafter, six databases (EMBASE, MEDLINE, Global Health, Web of Science, CINAHL, and mHealth Evidence) were searched to assess which of the apps identified in the commercial review had been validated against gold standard measures. A comparison was made between validated apps. RESULTS: App store search queries returned 30 apps that could be used for ear and hearing assessments, the majority of which are for performing audiometry. The literature search identified 11 eligible validity studies that examined 6 different apps. uHear, an app for self-administered audiometry, was validated in the highest number of peer reviewed studies against gold standard pure tone audiometry (n=5). However, the accuracy of uHear varied across these studies. CONCLUSIONS: Very few of the available apps have been validated in peer-reviewed studies. Of the apps that have been validated, further independent research is required to fully understand their accuracy at detecting ear and hearing conditions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5454564
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54545642017-06-07 Validated Smartphone-Based Apps for Ear and Hearing Assessments: A Review Bright, Tess Pallawela, Danuk JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol Review BACKGROUND: An estimated 360 million people have a disabling hearing impairment globally, the vast majority of whom live in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Early identification through screening is important to negate the negative effects of untreated hearing impairment. Substantial barriers exist in screening for hearing impairment in LMICs, such as the requirement for skilled hearing health care professionals and prohibitively expensive specialist equipment to measure hearing. These challenges may be overcome through utilization of increasingly available smartphone app technologies for ear and hearing assessments that are easy to use by unskilled professionals. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to identify and compare available apps for ear and hearing assessments and consider the incorporation of such apps into hearing screening programs METHODS: In July 2015, the commercial app stores Google Play and Apple App Store were searched to identify apps for ear and hearing assessments. Thereafter, six databases (EMBASE, MEDLINE, Global Health, Web of Science, CINAHL, and mHealth Evidence) were searched to assess which of the apps identified in the commercial review had been validated against gold standard measures. A comparison was made between validated apps. RESULTS: App store search queries returned 30 apps that could be used for ear and hearing assessments, the majority of which are for performing audiometry. The literature search identified 11 eligible validity studies that examined 6 different apps. uHear, an app for self-administered audiometry, was validated in the highest number of peer reviewed studies against gold standard pure tone audiometry (n=5). However, the accuracy of uHear varied across these studies. CONCLUSIONS: Very few of the available apps have been validated in peer-reviewed studies. Of the apps that have been validated, further independent research is required to fully understand their accuracy at detecting ear and hearing conditions. JMIR Publications 2016-12-23 /pmc/articles/PMC5454564/ /pubmed/28582261 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/rehab.6074 Text en ©Tess Bright, Danuk Pallawela. Originally published in JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technology (http://rehab.jmir.org), 23.12.2016. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technology, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://rehab.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Review
Bright, Tess
Pallawela, Danuk
Validated Smartphone-Based Apps for Ear and Hearing Assessments: A Review
title Validated Smartphone-Based Apps for Ear and Hearing Assessments: A Review
title_full Validated Smartphone-Based Apps for Ear and Hearing Assessments: A Review
title_fullStr Validated Smartphone-Based Apps for Ear and Hearing Assessments: A Review
title_full_unstemmed Validated Smartphone-Based Apps for Ear and Hearing Assessments: A Review
title_short Validated Smartphone-Based Apps for Ear and Hearing Assessments: A Review
title_sort validated smartphone-based apps for ear and hearing assessments: a review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5454564/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28582261
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/rehab.6074
work_keys_str_mv AT brighttess validatedsmartphonebasedappsforearandhearingassessmentsareview
AT pallaweladanuk validatedsmartphonebasedappsforearandhearingassessmentsareview