Cargando…
Does Breast Cancer Drive the Building of Survival Probability Models among States? An Assessment of Goodness of Fit for Patient Data from SEER Registries
BACKGROUND: Breast cancer is a worldwide public health concern and is the most prevalent type of cancer in women in the United States. This study concerned the best fit of statistical probability models on the basis of survival times for nine state cancer registries: California, Connecticut, Georgia...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
West Asia Organization for Cancer Prevention
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5454672/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28125875 http://dx.doi.org/10.22034/APJCP.2016.17.12.5287 |
_version_ | 1783240875646648320 |
---|---|
author | Khan, Hafiz Saxena, Anshul Perisetti, Abhilash Rafiq, Aamrin Gabbidon, Kemesha Mende, Sarah Lyuksyutova, Maria Quesada, Kandi Blakely, Summre Torres, Tiffany Afesse, Mahlet |
author_facet | Khan, Hafiz Saxena, Anshul Perisetti, Abhilash Rafiq, Aamrin Gabbidon, Kemesha Mende, Sarah Lyuksyutova, Maria Quesada, Kandi Blakely, Summre Torres, Tiffany Afesse, Mahlet |
author_sort | Khan, Hafiz |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Breast cancer is a worldwide public health concern and is the most prevalent type of cancer in women in the United States. This study concerned the best fit of statistical probability models on the basis of survival times for nine state cancer registries: California, Connecticut, Georgia, Hawaii, Iowa, Michigan, New Mexico, Utah, and Washington. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A probability random sampling method was applied to select and extract records of 2,000 breast cancer patients from the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database for each of the nine state cancer registries used in this study. EasyFit software was utilized to identify the best probability models by using goodness of fit tests, and to estimate parameters for various statistical probability distributions that fit survival data. RESULTS: Statistical analysis for the summary of statistics is reported for each of the states for the years 1973 to 2012. Kolmogorov-Smirnov, Anderson-Darling, and Chi-squared goodness of fit test values were used for survival data, the highest values of goodness of fit statistics being considered indicative of the best fit survival model for each state. CONCLUSIONS: It was found that California, Connecticut, Georgia, Iowa, New Mexico, and Washington followed the Burr probability distribution, while the Dagum probability distribution gave the best fit for Michigan and Utah, and Hawaii followed the Gamma probability distribution. These findings highlight differences between states through selected sociodemographic variables and also demonstrate probability modeling differences in breast cancer survival times. The results of this study can be used to guide healthcare providers and researchers for further investigations into social and environmental factors in order to reduce the occurrence of and mortality due to breast cancer. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5454672 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | West Asia Organization for Cancer Prevention |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54546722017-08-28 Does Breast Cancer Drive the Building of Survival Probability Models among States? An Assessment of Goodness of Fit for Patient Data from SEER Registries Khan, Hafiz Saxena, Anshul Perisetti, Abhilash Rafiq, Aamrin Gabbidon, Kemesha Mende, Sarah Lyuksyutova, Maria Quesada, Kandi Blakely, Summre Torres, Tiffany Afesse, Mahlet Asian Pac J Cancer Prev Research Article BACKGROUND: Breast cancer is a worldwide public health concern and is the most prevalent type of cancer in women in the United States. This study concerned the best fit of statistical probability models on the basis of survival times for nine state cancer registries: California, Connecticut, Georgia, Hawaii, Iowa, Michigan, New Mexico, Utah, and Washington. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A probability random sampling method was applied to select and extract records of 2,000 breast cancer patients from the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database for each of the nine state cancer registries used in this study. EasyFit software was utilized to identify the best probability models by using goodness of fit tests, and to estimate parameters for various statistical probability distributions that fit survival data. RESULTS: Statistical analysis for the summary of statistics is reported for each of the states for the years 1973 to 2012. Kolmogorov-Smirnov, Anderson-Darling, and Chi-squared goodness of fit test values were used for survival data, the highest values of goodness of fit statistics being considered indicative of the best fit survival model for each state. CONCLUSIONS: It was found that California, Connecticut, Georgia, Iowa, New Mexico, and Washington followed the Burr probability distribution, while the Dagum probability distribution gave the best fit for Michigan and Utah, and Hawaii followed the Gamma probability distribution. These findings highlight differences between states through selected sociodemographic variables and also demonstrate probability modeling differences in breast cancer survival times. The results of this study can be used to guide healthcare providers and researchers for further investigations into social and environmental factors in order to reduce the occurrence of and mortality due to breast cancer. West Asia Organization for Cancer Prevention 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC5454672/ /pubmed/28125875 http://dx.doi.org/10.22034/APJCP.2016.17.12.5287 Text en Copyright: © Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention http://creativecommons.org/licenses/BY-SA/4.0 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License |
spellingShingle | Research Article Khan, Hafiz Saxena, Anshul Perisetti, Abhilash Rafiq, Aamrin Gabbidon, Kemesha Mende, Sarah Lyuksyutova, Maria Quesada, Kandi Blakely, Summre Torres, Tiffany Afesse, Mahlet Does Breast Cancer Drive the Building of Survival Probability Models among States? An Assessment of Goodness of Fit for Patient Data from SEER Registries |
title | Does Breast Cancer Drive the Building of Survival Probability Models among States? An Assessment of Goodness of Fit for Patient Data from SEER Registries |
title_full | Does Breast Cancer Drive the Building of Survival Probability Models among States? An Assessment of Goodness of Fit for Patient Data from SEER Registries |
title_fullStr | Does Breast Cancer Drive the Building of Survival Probability Models among States? An Assessment of Goodness of Fit for Patient Data from SEER Registries |
title_full_unstemmed | Does Breast Cancer Drive the Building of Survival Probability Models among States? An Assessment of Goodness of Fit for Patient Data from SEER Registries |
title_short | Does Breast Cancer Drive the Building of Survival Probability Models among States? An Assessment of Goodness of Fit for Patient Data from SEER Registries |
title_sort | does breast cancer drive the building of survival probability models among states? an assessment of goodness of fit for patient data from seer registries |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5454672/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28125875 http://dx.doi.org/10.22034/APJCP.2016.17.12.5287 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT khanhafiz doesbreastcancerdrivethebuildingofsurvivalprobabilitymodelsamongstatesanassessmentofgoodnessoffitforpatientdatafromseerregistries AT saxenaanshul doesbreastcancerdrivethebuildingofsurvivalprobabilitymodelsamongstatesanassessmentofgoodnessoffitforpatientdatafromseerregistries AT perisettiabhilash doesbreastcancerdrivethebuildingofsurvivalprobabilitymodelsamongstatesanassessmentofgoodnessoffitforpatientdatafromseerregistries AT rafiqaamrin doesbreastcancerdrivethebuildingofsurvivalprobabilitymodelsamongstatesanassessmentofgoodnessoffitforpatientdatafromseerregistries AT gabbidonkemesha doesbreastcancerdrivethebuildingofsurvivalprobabilitymodelsamongstatesanassessmentofgoodnessoffitforpatientdatafromseerregistries AT mendesarah doesbreastcancerdrivethebuildingofsurvivalprobabilitymodelsamongstatesanassessmentofgoodnessoffitforpatientdatafromseerregistries AT lyuksyutovamaria doesbreastcancerdrivethebuildingofsurvivalprobabilitymodelsamongstatesanassessmentofgoodnessoffitforpatientdatafromseerregistries AT quesadakandi doesbreastcancerdrivethebuildingofsurvivalprobabilitymodelsamongstatesanassessmentofgoodnessoffitforpatientdatafromseerregistries AT blakelysummre doesbreastcancerdrivethebuildingofsurvivalprobabilitymodelsamongstatesanassessmentofgoodnessoffitforpatientdatafromseerregistries AT torrestiffany doesbreastcancerdrivethebuildingofsurvivalprobabilitymodelsamongstatesanassessmentofgoodnessoffitforpatientdatafromseerregistries AT afessemahlet doesbreastcancerdrivethebuildingofsurvivalprobabilitymodelsamongstatesanassessmentofgoodnessoffitforpatientdatafromseerregistries |