Cargando…

Diagnostic Value of Fine-Needle Aspiration Biopsies and Pathologic Methods for Benign and Malignant Breast Masses and Axillary Node Assessment

BACGROUND: The goal of this study was to evaluate the fine needle aspiration (FNA) preoperatively together with Touch Print, Crush Print, frozen section and pathologic methods to reach a diagnosis for patients with breast and axillary masses. METHODS: This study was conducted on 107 patients, and in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ahmadinejad, Mojtaba, Hajimaghsoudi, Leila, Pouryaghobi, Seyyed Mohsen, Ahmadinejad, Izadmehr, Ahmadi, Koorosh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: West Asia Organization for Cancer Prevention 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5454756/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28345843
http://dx.doi.org/10.22034/APJCP.2017.18.2.541
_version_ 1783240897207468032
author Ahmadinejad, Mojtaba
Hajimaghsoudi, Leila
Pouryaghobi, Seyyed Mohsen
Ahmadinejad, Izadmehr
Ahmadi, Koorosh
author_facet Ahmadinejad, Mojtaba
Hajimaghsoudi, Leila
Pouryaghobi, Seyyed Mohsen
Ahmadinejad, Izadmehr
Ahmadi, Koorosh
author_sort Ahmadinejad, Mojtaba
collection PubMed
description BACGROUND: The goal of this study was to evaluate the fine needle aspiration (FNA) preoperatively together with Touch Print, Crush Print, frozen section and pathologic methods to reach a diagnosis for patients with breast and axillary masses. METHODS: This study was conducted on 107 patients, and included 111 samples of breast and 43 of axillary masses taken at surgery. Data on epidemiological and clinical features of the patients were collected using a questionnaire. The results of the methods of FNA, Touch Print, and Crush Print were compared with the results of pathology after operations. RESULTS: Comparison between the diagnosis values of FNA with pathology for breast cancer showed sensitivity, sensitivity, positive predictive values, negative predictive values, positive mendacious percentages, and negative mendacious percentages of 80.4%, 98%, 97.3%, 87.6%, 2%, and 19.6%, respectively, and for metastatic axillary lymph nodes, 80%, 95.6%, 94.1%, 84.6%, 4.4%, and 20%. Comparison of diagnosis values of FNA with Touch Print and Crush Print for breast cancer gave values of 82.2%, 89%, 97.3%, 89%, 1.6%, and 17.8%, respectively, and for metastatic axillary lymph nodes 84.2%, 95.8%, 94.1%, 88.4%, 14.2%, and 15.8%. CONCLUSION: Use of these methods, compared with pathology, can decrease cost, time, and a need for a second surgery and related complications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5454756
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher West Asia Organization for Cancer Prevention
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54547562017-08-28 Diagnostic Value of Fine-Needle Aspiration Biopsies and Pathologic Methods for Benign and Malignant Breast Masses and Axillary Node Assessment Ahmadinejad, Mojtaba Hajimaghsoudi, Leila Pouryaghobi, Seyyed Mohsen Ahmadinejad, Izadmehr Ahmadi, Koorosh Asian Pac J Cancer Prev Research Article BACGROUND: The goal of this study was to evaluate the fine needle aspiration (FNA) preoperatively together with Touch Print, Crush Print, frozen section and pathologic methods to reach a diagnosis for patients with breast and axillary masses. METHODS: This study was conducted on 107 patients, and included 111 samples of breast and 43 of axillary masses taken at surgery. Data on epidemiological and clinical features of the patients were collected using a questionnaire. The results of the methods of FNA, Touch Print, and Crush Print were compared with the results of pathology after operations. RESULTS: Comparison between the diagnosis values of FNA with pathology for breast cancer showed sensitivity, sensitivity, positive predictive values, negative predictive values, positive mendacious percentages, and negative mendacious percentages of 80.4%, 98%, 97.3%, 87.6%, 2%, and 19.6%, respectively, and for metastatic axillary lymph nodes, 80%, 95.6%, 94.1%, 84.6%, 4.4%, and 20%. Comparison of diagnosis values of FNA with Touch Print and Crush Print for breast cancer gave values of 82.2%, 89%, 97.3%, 89%, 1.6%, and 17.8%, respectively, and for metastatic axillary lymph nodes 84.2%, 95.8%, 94.1%, 88.4%, 14.2%, and 15.8%. CONCLUSION: Use of these methods, compared with pathology, can decrease cost, time, and a need for a second surgery and related complications. West Asia Organization for Cancer Prevention 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5454756/ /pubmed/28345843 http://dx.doi.org/10.22034/APJCP.2017.18.2.541 Text en Copyright: © Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention http://creativecommons.org/licenses/BY-SA/4.0 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
spellingShingle Research Article
Ahmadinejad, Mojtaba
Hajimaghsoudi, Leila
Pouryaghobi, Seyyed Mohsen
Ahmadinejad, Izadmehr
Ahmadi, Koorosh
Diagnostic Value of Fine-Needle Aspiration Biopsies and Pathologic Methods for Benign and Malignant Breast Masses and Axillary Node Assessment
title Diagnostic Value of Fine-Needle Aspiration Biopsies and Pathologic Methods for Benign and Malignant Breast Masses and Axillary Node Assessment
title_full Diagnostic Value of Fine-Needle Aspiration Biopsies and Pathologic Methods for Benign and Malignant Breast Masses and Axillary Node Assessment
title_fullStr Diagnostic Value of Fine-Needle Aspiration Biopsies and Pathologic Methods for Benign and Malignant Breast Masses and Axillary Node Assessment
title_full_unstemmed Diagnostic Value of Fine-Needle Aspiration Biopsies and Pathologic Methods for Benign and Malignant Breast Masses and Axillary Node Assessment
title_short Diagnostic Value of Fine-Needle Aspiration Biopsies and Pathologic Methods for Benign and Malignant Breast Masses and Axillary Node Assessment
title_sort diagnostic value of fine-needle aspiration biopsies and pathologic methods for benign and malignant breast masses and axillary node assessment
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5454756/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28345843
http://dx.doi.org/10.22034/APJCP.2017.18.2.541
work_keys_str_mv AT ahmadinejadmojtaba diagnosticvalueoffineneedleaspirationbiopsiesandpathologicmethodsforbenignandmalignantbreastmassesandaxillarynodeassessment
AT hajimaghsoudileila diagnosticvalueoffineneedleaspirationbiopsiesandpathologicmethodsforbenignandmalignantbreastmassesandaxillarynodeassessment
AT pouryaghobiseyyedmohsen diagnosticvalueoffineneedleaspirationbiopsiesandpathologicmethodsforbenignandmalignantbreastmassesandaxillarynodeassessment
AT ahmadinejadizadmehr diagnosticvalueoffineneedleaspirationbiopsiesandpathologicmethodsforbenignandmalignantbreastmassesandaxillarynodeassessment
AT ahmadikoorosh diagnosticvalueoffineneedleaspirationbiopsiesandpathologicmethodsforbenignandmalignantbreastmassesandaxillarynodeassessment