Cargando…
Target Therapies for Uterine Carcinosarcomas: Current Evidence and Future Perspectives
Carcinosarcomas (CS) in gynecology are very infrequent and represent only 2–5% of uterine cancers. Despite surgical cytoreduction and subsequent chemotherapy being the primary treatment for uterine CS, the overall five-year survival rate is 30 ± 9% and recurrence is extremely common (50–80%). Due to...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5455008/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28531111 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms18051100 |
_version_ | 1783240960153485312 |
---|---|
author | Vitale, Salvatore Giovanni Laganà, Antonio Simone Capriglione, Stella Angioli, Roberto La Rosa, Valentina Lucia Lopez, Salvatore Valenti, Gaetano Sapia, Fabrizio Sarpietro, Giuseppe Butticè, Salvatore Tuscano, Carmelo Fanale, Daniele Tropea, Alessandro Rossetti, Diego |
author_facet | Vitale, Salvatore Giovanni Laganà, Antonio Simone Capriglione, Stella Angioli, Roberto La Rosa, Valentina Lucia Lopez, Salvatore Valenti, Gaetano Sapia, Fabrizio Sarpietro, Giuseppe Butticè, Salvatore Tuscano, Carmelo Fanale, Daniele Tropea, Alessandro Rossetti, Diego |
author_sort | Vitale, Salvatore Giovanni |
collection | PubMed |
description | Carcinosarcomas (CS) in gynecology are very infrequent and represent only 2–5% of uterine cancers. Despite surgical cytoreduction and subsequent chemotherapy being the primary treatment for uterine CS, the overall five-year survival rate is 30 ± 9% and recurrence is extremely common (50–80%). Due to the poor prognosis of CS, new strategies have been developed in the last few decades, targeting known dysfunctional molecular pathways for immunotherapy. In this paper, we aimed to gather the available evidence on the latest therapies for the treatment of CS. We performed a systematic review using the terms “uterine carcinosarcoma”, “uterine Malignant Mixed Müllerian Tumors”, “target therapies”, “angiogenesis therapy”, “cancer stem cell therapy”, “prognostic biomarker”, and “novel antibody-drug”. Based on our results, the differential expression and accessibility of epithelial cell adhesion molecule-1 on metastatic/chemotherapy-resistant CS cells in comparison to normal tissues and Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2) open up new possibilities in the field of target therapy. Nevertheless, future investigations are needed to clarify the impact of these new therapies on survival rate and medium-/long-term outcomes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5455008 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54550082017-06-08 Target Therapies for Uterine Carcinosarcomas: Current Evidence and Future Perspectives Vitale, Salvatore Giovanni Laganà, Antonio Simone Capriglione, Stella Angioli, Roberto La Rosa, Valentina Lucia Lopez, Salvatore Valenti, Gaetano Sapia, Fabrizio Sarpietro, Giuseppe Butticè, Salvatore Tuscano, Carmelo Fanale, Daniele Tropea, Alessandro Rossetti, Diego Int J Mol Sci Review Carcinosarcomas (CS) in gynecology are very infrequent and represent only 2–5% of uterine cancers. Despite surgical cytoreduction and subsequent chemotherapy being the primary treatment for uterine CS, the overall five-year survival rate is 30 ± 9% and recurrence is extremely common (50–80%). Due to the poor prognosis of CS, new strategies have been developed in the last few decades, targeting known dysfunctional molecular pathways for immunotherapy. In this paper, we aimed to gather the available evidence on the latest therapies for the treatment of CS. We performed a systematic review using the terms “uterine carcinosarcoma”, “uterine Malignant Mixed Müllerian Tumors”, “target therapies”, “angiogenesis therapy”, “cancer stem cell therapy”, “prognostic biomarker”, and “novel antibody-drug”. Based on our results, the differential expression and accessibility of epithelial cell adhesion molecule-1 on metastatic/chemotherapy-resistant CS cells in comparison to normal tissues and Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2) open up new possibilities in the field of target therapy. Nevertheless, future investigations are needed to clarify the impact of these new therapies on survival rate and medium-/long-term outcomes. MDPI 2017-05-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5455008/ /pubmed/28531111 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms18051100 Text en © 2017 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Vitale, Salvatore Giovanni Laganà, Antonio Simone Capriglione, Stella Angioli, Roberto La Rosa, Valentina Lucia Lopez, Salvatore Valenti, Gaetano Sapia, Fabrizio Sarpietro, Giuseppe Butticè, Salvatore Tuscano, Carmelo Fanale, Daniele Tropea, Alessandro Rossetti, Diego Target Therapies for Uterine Carcinosarcomas: Current Evidence and Future Perspectives |
title | Target Therapies for Uterine Carcinosarcomas: Current Evidence and Future Perspectives |
title_full | Target Therapies for Uterine Carcinosarcomas: Current Evidence and Future Perspectives |
title_fullStr | Target Therapies for Uterine Carcinosarcomas: Current Evidence and Future Perspectives |
title_full_unstemmed | Target Therapies for Uterine Carcinosarcomas: Current Evidence and Future Perspectives |
title_short | Target Therapies for Uterine Carcinosarcomas: Current Evidence and Future Perspectives |
title_sort | target therapies for uterine carcinosarcomas: current evidence and future perspectives |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5455008/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28531111 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms18051100 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vitalesalvatoregiovanni targettherapiesforuterinecarcinosarcomascurrentevidenceandfutureperspectives AT laganaantoniosimone targettherapiesforuterinecarcinosarcomascurrentevidenceandfutureperspectives AT capriglionestella targettherapiesforuterinecarcinosarcomascurrentevidenceandfutureperspectives AT angioliroberto targettherapiesforuterinecarcinosarcomascurrentevidenceandfutureperspectives AT larosavalentinalucia targettherapiesforuterinecarcinosarcomascurrentevidenceandfutureperspectives AT lopezsalvatore targettherapiesforuterinecarcinosarcomascurrentevidenceandfutureperspectives AT valentigaetano targettherapiesforuterinecarcinosarcomascurrentevidenceandfutureperspectives AT sapiafabrizio targettherapiesforuterinecarcinosarcomascurrentevidenceandfutureperspectives AT sarpietrogiuseppe targettherapiesforuterinecarcinosarcomascurrentevidenceandfutureperspectives AT butticesalvatore targettherapiesforuterinecarcinosarcomascurrentevidenceandfutureperspectives AT tuscanocarmelo targettherapiesforuterinecarcinosarcomascurrentevidenceandfutureperspectives AT fanaledaniele targettherapiesforuterinecarcinosarcomascurrentevidenceandfutureperspectives AT tropeaalessandro targettherapiesforuterinecarcinosarcomascurrentevidenceandfutureperspectives AT rossettidiego targettherapiesforuterinecarcinosarcomascurrentevidenceandfutureperspectives |