Cargando…

Target Therapies for Uterine Carcinosarcomas: Current Evidence and Future Perspectives

Carcinosarcomas (CS) in gynecology are very infrequent and represent only 2–5% of uterine cancers. Despite surgical cytoreduction and subsequent chemotherapy being the primary treatment for uterine CS, the overall five-year survival rate is 30 ± 9% and recurrence is extremely common (50–80%). Due to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vitale, Salvatore Giovanni, Laganà, Antonio Simone, Capriglione, Stella, Angioli, Roberto, La Rosa, Valentina Lucia, Lopez, Salvatore, Valenti, Gaetano, Sapia, Fabrizio, Sarpietro, Giuseppe, Butticè, Salvatore, Tuscano, Carmelo, Fanale, Daniele, Tropea, Alessandro, Rossetti, Diego
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5455008/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28531111
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms18051100
_version_ 1783240960153485312
author Vitale, Salvatore Giovanni
Laganà, Antonio Simone
Capriglione, Stella
Angioli, Roberto
La Rosa, Valentina Lucia
Lopez, Salvatore
Valenti, Gaetano
Sapia, Fabrizio
Sarpietro, Giuseppe
Butticè, Salvatore
Tuscano, Carmelo
Fanale, Daniele
Tropea, Alessandro
Rossetti, Diego
author_facet Vitale, Salvatore Giovanni
Laganà, Antonio Simone
Capriglione, Stella
Angioli, Roberto
La Rosa, Valentina Lucia
Lopez, Salvatore
Valenti, Gaetano
Sapia, Fabrizio
Sarpietro, Giuseppe
Butticè, Salvatore
Tuscano, Carmelo
Fanale, Daniele
Tropea, Alessandro
Rossetti, Diego
author_sort Vitale, Salvatore Giovanni
collection PubMed
description Carcinosarcomas (CS) in gynecology are very infrequent and represent only 2–5% of uterine cancers. Despite surgical cytoreduction and subsequent chemotherapy being the primary treatment for uterine CS, the overall five-year survival rate is 30 ± 9% and recurrence is extremely common (50–80%). Due to the poor prognosis of CS, new strategies have been developed in the last few decades, targeting known dysfunctional molecular pathways for immunotherapy. In this paper, we aimed to gather the available evidence on the latest therapies for the treatment of CS. We performed a systematic review using the terms “uterine carcinosarcoma”, “uterine Malignant Mixed Müllerian Tumors”, “target therapies”, “angiogenesis therapy”, “cancer stem cell therapy”, “prognostic biomarker”, and “novel antibody-drug”. Based on our results, the differential expression and accessibility of epithelial cell adhesion molecule-1 on metastatic/chemotherapy-resistant CS cells in comparison to normal tissues and Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2) open up new possibilities in the field of target therapy. Nevertheless, future investigations are needed to clarify the impact of these new therapies on survival rate and medium-/long-term outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5455008
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54550082017-06-08 Target Therapies for Uterine Carcinosarcomas: Current Evidence and Future Perspectives Vitale, Salvatore Giovanni Laganà, Antonio Simone Capriglione, Stella Angioli, Roberto La Rosa, Valentina Lucia Lopez, Salvatore Valenti, Gaetano Sapia, Fabrizio Sarpietro, Giuseppe Butticè, Salvatore Tuscano, Carmelo Fanale, Daniele Tropea, Alessandro Rossetti, Diego Int J Mol Sci Review Carcinosarcomas (CS) in gynecology are very infrequent and represent only 2–5% of uterine cancers. Despite surgical cytoreduction and subsequent chemotherapy being the primary treatment for uterine CS, the overall five-year survival rate is 30 ± 9% and recurrence is extremely common (50–80%). Due to the poor prognosis of CS, new strategies have been developed in the last few decades, targeting known dysfunctional molecular pathways for immunotherapy. In this paper, we aimed to gather the available evidence on the latest therapies for the treatment of CS. We performed a systematic review using the terms “uterine carcinosarcoma”, “uterine Malignant Mixed Müllerian Tumors”, “target therapies”, “angiogenesis therapy”, “cancer stem cell therapy”, “prognostic biomarker”, and “novel antibody-drug”. Based on our results, the differential expression and accessibility of epithelial cell adhesion molecule-1 on metastatic/chemotherapy-resistant CS cells in comparison to normal tissues and Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2) open up new possibilities in the field of target therapy. Nevertheless, future investigations are needed to clarify the impact of these new therapies on survival rate and medium-/long-term outcomes. MDPI 2017-05-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5455008/ /pubmed/28531111 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms18051100 Text en © 2017 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Vitale, Salvatore Giovanni
Laganà, Antonio Simone
Capriglione, Stella
Angioli, Roberto
La Rosa, Valentina Lucia
Lopez, Salvatore
Valenti, Gaetano
Sapia, Fabrizio
Sarpietro, Giuseppe
Butticè, Salvatore
Tuscano, Carmelo
Fanale, Daniele
Tropea, Alessandro
Rossetti, Diego
Target Therapies for Uterine Carcinosarcomas: Current Evidence and Future Perspectives
title Target Therapies for Uterine Carcinosarcomas: Current Evidence and Future Perspectives
title_full Target Therapies for Uterine Carcinosarcomas: Current Evidence and Future Perspectives
title_fullStr Target Therapies for Uterine Carcinosarcomas: Current Evidence and Future Perspectives
title_full_unstemmed Target Therapies for Uterine Carcinosarcomas: Current Evidence and Future Perspectives
title_short Target Therapies for Uterine Carcinosarcomas: Current Evidence and Future Perspectives
title_sort target therapies for uterine carcinosarcomas: current evidence and future perspectives
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5455008/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28531111
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms18051100
work_keys_str_mv AT vitalesalvatoregiovanni targettherapiesforuterinecarcinosarcomascurrentevidenceandfutureperspectives
AT laganaantoniosimone targettherapiesforuterinecarcinosarcomascurrentevidenceandfutureperspectives
AT capriglionestella targettherapiesforuterinecarcinosarcomascurrentevidenceandfutureperspectives
AT angioliroberto targettherapiesforuterinecarcinosarcomascurrentevidenceandfutureperspectives
AT larosavalentinalucia targettherapiesforuterinecarcinosarcomascurrentevidenceandfutureperspectives
AT lopezsalvatore targettherapiesforuterinecarcinosarcomascurrentevidenceandfutureperspectives
AT valentigaetano targettherapiesforuterinecarcinosarcomascurrentevidenceandfutureperspectives
AT sapiafabrizio targettherapiesforuterinecarcinosarcomascurrentevidenceandfutureperspectives
AT sarpietrogiuseppe targettherapiesforuterinecarcinosarcomascurrentevidenceandfutureperspectives
AT butticesalvatore targettherapiesforuterinecarcinosarcomascurrentevidenceandfutureperspectives
AT tuscanocarmelo targettherapiesforuterinecarcinosarcomascurrentevidenceandfutureperspectives
AT fanaledaniele targettherapiesforuterinecarcinosarcomascurrentevidenceandfutureperspectives
AT tropeaalessandro targettherapiesforuterinecarcinosarcomascurrentevidenceandfutureperspectives
AT rossettidiego targettherapiesforuterinecarcinosarcomascurrentevidenceandfutureperspectives