Cargando…

Evaluation of the safety and efficacy of a novel product for the removal of impacted human cerumen

BACKGROUND: This open-label study evaluated the safety and efficacy of a novel product for the removal of impacted cerumen in adult patients. METHODS: This was a prospective, single-center, single-arm, self-controlled clinical trial conducted in a community general practice setting. The novel produc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fullington, Douglas, Song, Jenny, Gilles, Antionette, Guo, Xiaowen, Hua, Waley, Anderson, C. Eric, Griffin, Joseph
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5455110/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28588421
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12901-017-0038-8
_version_ 1783240983610130432
author Fullington, Douglas
Song, Jenny
Gilles, Antionette
Guo, Xiaowen
Hua, Waley
Anderson, C. Eric
Griffin, Joseph
author_facet Fullington, Douglas
Song, Jenny
Gilles, Antionette
Guo, Xiaowen
Hua, Waley
Anderson, C. Eric
Griffin, Joseph
author_sort Fullington, Douglas
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This open-label study evaluated the safety and efficacy of a novel product for the removal of impacted cerumen in adult patients. METHODS: This was a prospective, single-center, single-arm, self-controlled clinical trial conducted in a community general practice setting. The novel product contains glycolic acid in an otologically-acceptable buffer containing sodium bicarbonate and glycerin and other buffering agents. The product was instilled into the ear canal prior to irrigation with warm water. Severity of cerumen impaction was graded using a 5-point scale. Improvement in tympanic membrane visualization was assessed after instillation and irrigation. RESULTS: A majority (83%, 25/30) of ears showed improvement with one application: with 53% (16/30) totally dissolved and gained 100% TM visualization. Total dissolution was observed in 80% (24/30) of the study ears per the intent-to-treat analysis and 86% (24/28) if irrigation instructions were followed. Most of the ears/participants that had cerumen blockage symptoms experienced significant improvement with the application. Feelings of fullness disappeared in 92% (11/12) of the affected ears; ears itching, 91% (10/11); water trapping or cracking, 78%, and decreased hearing disappeared in 71% (10/14). All (100%, 18) of the participants who completed the application satisfaction assessment were satisfied with the application process in terms of time needed and the overall rinse procedure. Only one mild adverse event (ear pruritis) occurred that was related to application. CONCLUSIONS: The tested cerumen removal product was effective and safe for removing moderate to severe blockage in patients with impacted cerumen. Procedure satisfaction for the product was high. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial is registered on http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/. The registration number is NCT02829294. The trial was retrospectively registered on July 8, 2016.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5455110
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54551102017-06-06 Evaluation of the safety and efficacy of a novel product for the removal of impacted human cerumen Fullington, Douglas Song, Jenny Gilles, Antionette Guo, Xiaowen Hua, Waley Anderson, C. Eric Griffin, Joseph BMC Ear Nose Throat Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: This open-label study evaluated the safety and efficacy of a novel product for the removal of impacted cerumen in adult patients. METHODS: This was a prospective, single-center, single-arm, self-controlled clinical trial conducted in a community general practice setting. The novel product contains glycolic acid in an otologically-acceptable buffer containing sodium bicarbonate and glycerin and other buffering agents. The product was instilled into the ear canal prior to irrigation with warm water. Severity of cerumen impaction was graded using a 5-point scale. Improvement in tympanic membrane visualization was assessed after instillation and irrigation. RESULTS: A majority (83%, 25/30) of ears showed improvement with one application: with 53% (16/30) totally dissolved and gained 100% TM visualization. Total dissolution was observed in 80% (24/30) of the study ears per the intent-to-treat analysis and 86% (24/28) if irrigation instructions were followed. Most of the ears/participants that had cerumen blockage symptoms experienced significant improvement with the application. Feelings of fullness disappeared in 92% (11/12) of the affected ears; ears itching, 91% (10/11); water trapping or cracking, 78%, and decreased hearing disappeared in 71% (10/14). All (100%, 18) of the participants who completed the application satisfaction assessment were satisfied with the application process in terms of time needed and the overall rinse procedure. Only one mild adverse event (ear pruritis) occurred that was related to application. CONCLUSIONS: The tested cerumen removal product was effective and safe for removing moderate to severe blockage in patients with impacted cerumen. Procedure satisfaction for the product was high. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial is registered on http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/. The registration number is NCT02829294. The trial was retrospectively registered on July 8, 2016. BioMed Central 2017-06-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5455110/ /pubmed/28588421 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12901-017-0038-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Fullington, Douglas
Song, Jenny
Gilles, Antionette
Guo, Xiaowen
Hua, Waley
Anderson, C. Eric
Griffin, Joseph
Evaluation of the safety and efficacy of a novel product for the removal of impacted human cerumen
title Evaluation of the safety and efficacy of a novel product for the removal of impacted human cerumen
title_full Evaluation of the safety and efficacy of a novel product for the removal of impacted human cerumen
title_fullStr Evaluation of the safety and efficacy of a novel product for the removal of impacted human cerumen
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the safety and efficacy of a novel product for the removal of impacted human cerumen
title_short Evaluation of the safety and efficacy of a novel product for the removal of impacted human cerumen
title_sort evaluation of the safety and efficacy of a novel product for the removal of impacted human cerumen
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5455110/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28588421
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12901-017-0038-8
work_keys_str_mv AT fullingtondouglas evaluationofthesafetyandefficacyofanovelproductfortheremovalofimpactedhumancerumen
AT songjenny evaluationofthesafetyandefficacyofanovelproductfortheremovalofimpactedhumancerumen
AT gillesantionette evaluationofthesafetyandefficacyofanovelproductfortheremovalofimpactedhumancerumen
AT guoxiaowen evaluationofthesafetyandefficacyofanovelproductfortheremovalofimpactedhumancerumen
AT huawaley evaluationofthesafetyandefficacyofanovelproductfortheremovalofimpactedhumancerumen
AT andersonceric evaluationofthesafetyandefficacyofanovelproductfortheremovalofimpactedhumancerumen
AT griffinjoseph evaluationofthesafetyandefficacyofanovelproductfortheremovalofimpactedhumancerumen