Cargando…
Research dissemination workshops: observations and implications based on an experience in Burkina Faso
BACKGROUND: In Burkina Faso, malaria remains the primary cause of healthcare use, morbidity and child mortality. Therefore, efforts are needed to support the knowledge transfer and application of the results of numerous studies to better formulate and implement programs in the fight against the mala...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5455175/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28577560 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12961-017-0205-9 |
_version_ | 1783240994934751232 |
---|---|
author | Mc Sween-Cadieux, Esther Dagenais, Christian Somé, Paul-André Ridde, Valéry |
author_facet | Mc Sween-Cadieux, Esther Dagenais, Christian Somé, Paul-André Ridde, Valéry |
author_sort | Mc Sween-Cadieux, Esther |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: In Burkina Faso, malaria remains the primary cause of healthcare use, morbidity and child mortality. Therefore, efforts are needed to support the knowledge transfer and application of the results of numerous studies to better formulate and implement programs in the fight against the malaria pandemic. To this end, a 2-day dissemination workshop was held to share the most recent results produced by a multidisciplinary research team. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the workshop and the policy briefs distributed there, the effects these produced on research results use and the processes that facilitated, or not, the application of the knowledge transmitted. METHODS: A mixed-methods design was used. The data were drawn from a quantitative evaluation questionnaire completed after the workshop (n = 25/31) and qualitative interviews conducted with the researchers and various actors who attended the workshop (n = 11) and with participants in working groups (n = 40) that later analysed the policy briefs distributed at the workshop. RESULTS: The participants recognised the quality of the research results presented, but felt that more needed to be done to adapt the researchers’ language and improve the functioning of the workshop. The potential effects of the workshop were rather limited. Effects were mainly at two levels: individual (e.g. acquisition of new knowledge, personal awareness raising) and local (e.g. change of practice in a local non-governmental organisation). Most participants perceived the utility of the research results, but several reported that their narrow decisional power limited their ability to apply this knowledge. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed the importance of workshops to inform key actors of research results and the need to undertake several different activities to increase the chances that the knowledge will be applied. Several recommendations are proposed to improve knowledge translation approaches in the West African context, including organising working and discussion groups, developing an action plan at the end of the workshop and offering support to participants after the workshop, among others. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5455175 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54551752017-06-06 Research dissemination workshops: observations and implications based on an experience in Burkina Faso Mc Sween-Cadieux, Esther Dagenais, Christian Somé, Paul-André Ridde, Valéry Health Res Policy Syst Research BACKGROUND: In Burkina Faso, malaria remains the primary cause of healthcare use, morbidity and child mortality. Therefore, efforts are needed to support the knowledge transfer and application of the results of numerous studies to better formulate and implement programs in the fight against the malaria pandemic. To this end, a 2-day dissemination workshop was held to share the most recent results produced by a multidisciplinary research team. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the workshop and the policy briefs distributed there, the effects these produced on research results use and the processes that facilitated, or not, the application of the knowledge transmitted. METHODS: A mixed-methods design was used. The data were drawn from a quantitative evaluation questionnaire completed after the workshop (n = 25/31) and qualitative interviews conducted with the researchers and various actors who attended the workshop (n = 11) and with participants in working groups (n = 40) that later analysed the policy briefs distributed at the workshop. RESULTS: The participants recognised the quality of the research results presented, but felt that more needed to be done to adapt the researchers’ language and improve the functioning of the workshop. The potential effects of the workshop were rather limited. Effects were mainly at two levels: individual (e.g. acquisition of new knowledge, personal awareness raising) and local (e.g. change of practice in a local non-governmental organisation). Most participants perceived the utility of the research results, but several reported that their narrow decisional power limited their ability to apply this knowledge. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed the importance of workshops to inform key actors of research results and the need to undertake several different activities to increase the chances that the knowledge will be applied. Several recommendations are proposed to improve knowledge translation approaches in the West African context, including organising working and discussion groups, developing an action plan at the end of the workshop and offering support to participants after the workshop, among others. BioMed Central 2017-06-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5455175/ /pubmed/28577560 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12961-017-0205-9 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Mc Sween-Cadieux, Esther Dagenais, Christian Somé, Paul-André Ridde, Valéry Research dissemination workshops: observations and implications based on an experience in Burkina Faso |
title | Research dissemination workshops: observations and implications based on an experience in Burkina Faso |
title_full | Research dissemination workshops: observations and implications based on an experience in Burkina Faso |
title_fullStr | Research dissemination workshops: observations and implications based on an experience in Burkina Faso |
title_full_unstemmed | Research dissemination workshops: observations and implications based on an experience in Burkina Faso |
title_short | Research dissemination workshops: observations and implications based on an experience in Burkina Faso |
title_sort | research dissemination workshops: observations and implications based on an experience in burkina faso |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5455175/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28577560 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12961-017-0205-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mcsweencadieuxesther researchdisseminationworkshopsobservationsandimplicationsbasedonanexperienceinburkinafaso AT dagenaischristian researchdisseminationworkshopsobservationsandimplicationsbasedonanexperienceinburkinafaso AT somepaulandre researchdisseminationworkshopsobservationsandimplicationsbasedonanexperienceinburkinafaso AT riddevalery researchdisseminationworkshopsobservationsandimplicationsbasedonanexperienceinburkinafaso |