Cargando…
Graft Remodeling following Transcrestal Sinus Floor Elevation via the Gel-Pressure Technique (GPT) and Pasteous Nano-Crystalline Hydroxyapatite Bone Substitute
Bone grafting of the maxillary sinus is attempted to compensate for sinus pneumatization and permit reliable insertion of endosseous dental implants for prosthetic rehabilitation. The aim of the present clinical investigation was to study bone regeneration four months after transcrestal sinus floor...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5455727/ http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma8063210 |
_version_ | 1783241095684030464 |
---|---|
author | Pommer, Bernhard Unger, Ewald Busenlechner, Dieter Haas, Robert Mailath-Pokorny, Georg Fürhauser, Rudolf Watzek, Georg |
author_facet | Pommer, Bernhard Unger, Ewald Busenlechner, Dieter Haas, Robert Mailath-Pokorny, Georg Fürhauser, Rudolf Watzek, Georg |
author_sort | Pommer, Bernhard |
collection | PubMed |
description | Bone grafting of the maxillary sinus is attempted to compensate for sinus pneumatization and permit reliable insertion of endosseous dental implants for prosthetic rehabilitation. The aim of the present clinical investigation was to study bone regeneration four months after transcrestal sinus floor elevation via the Gel-Pressure Technique (GPT) and application of pasteous nano-crystalline hydroxyapatite bone substitute. A total of 25 patients with deficient alveolar ridges in the posterior maxilla (mean residual bone height: 4.7 ± 1.8 mm) were subjected to 32 flapless transcrestal sinus floor augmentations and simultaneous insertion of 40 implants. Sinus membrane elevation height averaged 11.2 ± 2.7 mm and minimal vertical graft resorption of 0.1 mm was observed after four months. Radiographic bone density averaged 460 Hounsfield units in regions adjacent to the native jawbone (1 to 7 mm distance), while reduction of bone density by −7.2%, −11.3%, −14.8%, −19.6% and −22.7% was recorded in more apical regions of 8, 9, 10, 11, and ≥12 mm distance to the original sinus floor, respectively. The results suggest that graft remodeling is completed up to a distance of 7 mm within a healing period of four months after sinus augmentation using nano-crystalline hydroxyapatite bone substitute material. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5455727 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54557272017-07-28 Graft Remodeling following Transcrestal Sinus Floor Elevation via the Gel-Pressure Technique (GPT) and Pasteous Nano-Crystalline Hydroxyapatite Bone Substitute Pommer, Bernhard Unger, Ewald Busenlechner, Dieter Haas, Robert Mailath-Pokorny, Georg Fürhauser, Rudolf Watzek, Georg Materials (Basel) Article Bone grafting of the maxillary sinus is attempted to compensate for sinus pneumatization and permit reliable insertion of endosseous dental implants for prosthetic rehabilitation. The aim of the present clinical investigation was to study bone regeneration four months after transcrestal sinus floor elevation via the Gel-Pressure Technique (GPT) and application of pasteous nano-crystalline hydroxyapatite bone substitute. A total of 25 patients with deficient alveolar ridges in the posterior maxilla (mean residual bone height: 4.7 ± 1.8 mm) were subjected to 32 flapless transcrestal sinus floor augmentations and simultaneous insertion of 40 implants. Sinus membrane elevation height averaged 11.2 ± 2.7 mm and minimal vertical graft resorption of 0.1 mm was observed after four months. Radiographic bone density averaged 460 Hounsfield units in regions adjacent to the native jawbone (1 to 7 mm distance), while reduction of bone density by −7.2%, −11.3%, −14.8%, −19.6% and −22.7% was recorded in more apical regions of 8, 9, 10, 11, and ≥12 mm distance to the original sinus floor, respectively. The results suggest that graft remodeling is completed up to a distance of 7 mm within a healing period of four months after sinus augmentation using nano-crystalline hydroxyapatite bone substitute material. MDPI 2015-06-03 /pmc/articles/PMC5455727/ http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma8063210 Text en © 2015 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Pommer, Bernhard Unger, Ewald Busenlechner, Dieter Haas, Robert Mailath-Pokorny, Georg Fürhauser, Rudolf Watzek, Georg Graft Remodeling following Transcrestal Sinus Floor Elevation via the Gel-Pressure Technique (GPT) and Pasteous Nano-Crystalline Hydroxyapatite Bone Substitute |
title | Graft Remodeling following Transcrestal Sinus Floor Elevation via the Gel-Pressure Technique (GPT) and Pasteous Nano-Crystalline Hydroxyapatite Bone Substitute |
title_full | Graft Remodeling following Transcrestal Sinus Floor Elevation via the Gel-Pressure Technique (GPT) and Pasteous Nano-Crystalline Hydroxyapatite Bone Substitute |
title_fullStr | Graft Remodeling following Transcrestal Sinus Floor Elevation via the Gel-Pressure Technique (GPT) and Pasteous Nano-Crystalline Hydroxyapatite Bone Substitute |
title_full_unstemmed | Graft Remodeling following Transcrestal Sinus Floor Elevation via the Gel-Pressure Technique (GPT) and Pasteous Nano-Crystalline Hydroxyapatite Bone Substitute |
title_short | Graft Remodeling following Transcrestal Sinus Floor Elevation via the Gel-Pressure Technique (GPT) and Pasteous Nano-Crystalline Hydroxyapatite Bone Substitute |
title_sort | graft remodeling following transcrestal sinus floor elevation via the gel-pressure technique (gpt) and pasteous nano-crystalline hydroxyapatite bone substitute |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5455727/ http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma8063210 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pommerbernhard graftremodelingfollowingtranscrestalsinusfloorelevationviathegelpressuretechniquegptandpasteousnanocrystallinehydroxyapatitebonesubstitute AT ungerewald graftremodelingfollowingtranscrestalsinusfloorelevationviathegelpressuretechniquegptandpasteousnanocrystallinehydroxyapatitebonesubstitute AT busenlechnerdieter graftremodelingfollowingtranscrestalsinusfloorelevationviathegelpressuretechniquegptandpasteousnanocrystallinehydroxyapatitebonesubstitute AT haasrobert graftremodelingfollowingtranscrestalsinusfloorelevationviathegelpressuretechniquegptandpasteousnanocrystallinehydroxyapatitebonesubstitute AT mailathpokornygeorg graftremodelingfollowingtranscrestalsinusfloorelevationviathegelpressuretechniquegptandpasteousnanocrystallinehydroxyapatitebonesubstitute AT furhauserrudolf graftremodelingfollowingtranscrestalsinusfloorelevationviathegelpressuretechniquegptandpasteousnanocrystallinehydroxyapatitebonesubstitute AT watzekgeorg graftremodelingfollowingtranscrestalsinusfloorelevationviathegelpressuretechniquegptandpasteousnanocrystallinehydroxyapatitebonesubstitute |