Cargando…

Graft Remodeling following Transcrestal Sinus Floor Elevation via the Gel-Pressure Technique (GPT) and Pasteous Nano-Crystalline Hydroxyapatite Bone Substitute

Bone grafting of the maxillary sinus is attempted to compensate for sinus pneumatization and permit reliable insertion of endosseous dental implants for prosthetic rehabilitation. The aim of the present clinical investigation was to study bone regeneration four months after transcrestal sinus floor...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pommer, Bernhard, Unger, Ewald, Busenlechner, Dieter, Haas, Robert, Mailath-Pokorny, Georg, Fürhauser, Rudolf, Watzek, Georg
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5455727/
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma8063210
_version_ 1783241095684030464
author Pommer, Bernhard
Unger, Ewald
Busenlechner, Dieter
Haas, Robert
Mailath-Pokorny, Georg
Fürhauser, Rudolf
Watzek, Georg
author_facet Pommer, Bernhard
Unger, Ewald
Busenlechner, Dieter
Haas, Robert
Mailath-Pokorny, Georg
Fürhauser, Rudolf
Watzek, Georg
author_sort Pommer, Bernhard
collection PubMed
description Bone grafting of the maxillary sinus is attempted to compensate for sinus pneumatization and permit reliable insertion of endosseous dental implants for prosthetic rehabilitation. The aim of the present clinical investigation was to study bone regeneration four months after transcrestal sinus floor elevation via the Gel-Pressure Technique (GPT) and application of pasteous nano-crystalline hydroxyapatite bone substitute. A total of 25 patients with deficient alveolar ridges in the posterior maxilla (mean residual bone height: 4.7 ± 1.8 mm) were subjected to 32 flapless transcrestal sinus floor augmentations and simultaneous insertion of 40 implants. Sinus membrane elevation height averaged 11.2 ± 2.7 mm and minimal vertical graft resorption of 0.1 mm was observed after four months. Radiographic bone density averaged 460 Hounsfield units in regions adjacent to the native jawbone (1 to 7 mm distance), while reduction of bone density by −7.2%, −11.3%, −14.8%, −19.6% and −22.7% was recorded in more apical regions of 8, 9, 10, 11, and ≥12 mm distance to the original sinus floor, respectively. The results suggest that graft remodeling is completed up to a distance of 7 mm within a healing period of four months after sinus augmentation using nano-crystalline hydroxyapatite bone substitute material.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5455727
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54557272017-07-28 Graft Remodeling following Transcrestal Sinus Floor Elevation via the Gel-Pressure Technique (GPT) and Pasteous Nano-Crystalline Hydroxyapatite Bone Substitute Pommer, Bernhard Unger, Ewald Busenlechner, Dieter Haas, Robert Mailath-Pokorny, Georg Fürhauser, Rudolf Watzek, Georg Materials (Basel) Article Bone grafting of the maxillary sinus is attempted to compensate for sinus pneumatization and permit reliable insertion of endosseous dental implants for prosthetic rehabilitation. The aim of the present clinical investigation was to study bone regeneration four months after transcrestal sinus floor elevation via the Gel-Pressure Technique (GPT) and application of pasteous nano-crystalline hydroxyapatite bone substitute. A total of 25 patients with deficient alveolar ridges in the posterior maxilla (mean residual bone height: 4.7 ± 1.8 mm) were subjected to 32 flapless transcrestal sinus floor augmentations and simultaneous insertion of 40 implants. Sinus membrane elevation height averaged 11.2 ± 2.7 mm and minimal vertical graft resorption of 0.1 mm was observed after four months. Radiographic bone density averaged 460 Hounsfield units in regions adjacent to the native jawbone (1 to 7 mm distance), while reduction of bone density by −7.2%, −11.3%, −14.8%, −19.6% and −22.7% was recorded in more apical regions of 8, 9, 10, 11, and ≥12 mm distance to the original sinus floor, respectively. The results suggest that graft remodeling is completed up to a distance of 7 mm within a healing period of four months after sinus augmentation using nano-crystalline hydroxyapatite bone substitute material. MDPI 2015-06-03 /pmc/articles/PMC5455727/ http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma8063210 Text en © 2015 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Pommer, Bernhard
Unger, Ewald
Busenlechner, Dieter
Haas, Robert
Mailath-Pokorny, Georg
Fürhauser, Rudolf
Watzek, Georg
Graft Remodeling following Transcrestal Sinus Floor Elevation via the Gel-Pressure Technique (GPT) and Pasteous Nano-Crystalline Hydroxyapatite Bone Substitute
title Graft Remodeling following Transcrestal Sinus Floor Elevation via the Gel-Pressure Technique (GPT) and Pasteous Nano-Crystalline Hydroxyapatite Bone Substitute
title_full Graft Remodeling following Transcrestal Sinus Floor Elevation via the Gel-Pressure Technique (GPT) and Pasteous Nano-Crystalline Hydroxyapatite Bone Substitute
title_fullStr Graft Remodeling following Transcrestal Sinus Floor Elevation via the Gel-Pressure Technique (GPT) and Pasteous Nano-Crystalline Hydroxyapatite Bone Substitute
title_full_unstemmed Graft Remodeling following Transcrestal Sinus Floor Elevation via the Gel-Pressure Technique (GPT) and Pasteous Nano-Crystalline Hydroxyapatite Bone Substitute
title_short Graft Remodeling following Transcrestal Sinus Floor Elevation via the Gel-Pressure Technique (GPT) and Pasteous Nano-Crystalline Hydroxyapatite Bone Substitute
title_sort graft remodeling following transcrestal sinus floor elevation via the gel-pressure technique (gpt) and pasteous nano-crystalline hydroxyapatite bone substitute
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5455727/
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma8063210
work_keys_str_mv AT pommerbernhard graftremodelingfollowingtranscrestalsinusfloorelevationviathegelpressuretechniquegptandpasteousnanocrystallinehydroxyapatitebonesubstitute
AT ungerewald graftremodelingfollowingtranscrestalsinusfloorelevationviathegelpressuretechniquegptandpasteousnanocrystallinehydroxyapatitebonesubstitute
AT busenlechnerdieter graftremodelingfollowingtranscrestalsinusfloorelevationviathegelpressuretechniquegptandpasteousnanocrystallinehydroxyapatitebonesubstitute
AT haasrobert graftremodelingfollowingtranscrestalsinusfloorelevationviathegelpressuretechniquegptandpasteousnanocrystallinehydroxyapatitebonesubstitute
AT mailathpokornygeorg graftremodelingfollowingtranscrestalsinusfloorelevationviathegelpressuretechniquegptandpasteousnanocrystallinehydroxyapatitebonesubstitute
AT furhauserrudolf graftremodelingfollowingtranscrestalsinusfloorelevationviathegelpressuretechniquegptandpasteousnanocrystallinehydroxyapatitebonesubstitute
AT watzekgeorg graftremodelingfollowingtranscrestalsinusfloorelevationviathegelpressuretechniquegptandpasteousnanocrystallinehydroxyapatitebonesubstitute