Cargando…

Comparative Shear-Bond Strength of Six Dental Self-Adhesive Resin Cements to Zirconia

This study compared shear bond strength (SBS) of six self-adhesive resin cements (SARC) and one resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC) to zirconia before and after thermocycling. The cylinder shape (Φ 2.35 mm × 3 mm) of six SARCs (G-CEM LinkAce (GLA), Maxcem Elite (MAX), Clearfil SA Luting (CSL...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Si-Eun, Bae, Ji-Hyeon, Choi, Jae-Won, Jeon, Yong-Chan, Jeong, Chang-Mo, Yoon, Mi-Jung, Huh, Jung-Bo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5455735/
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma8063306
_version_ 1783241097822076928
author Lee, Si-Eun
Bae, Ji-Hyeon
Choi, Jae-Won
Jeon, Yong-Chan
Jeong, Chang-Mo
Yoon, Mi-Jung
Huh, Jung-Bo
author_facet Lee, Si-Eun
Bae, Ji-Hyeon
Choi, Jae-Won
Jeon, Yong-Chan
Jeong, Chang-Mo
Yoon, Mi-Jung
Huh, Jung-Bo
author_sort Lee, Si-Eun
collection PubMed
description This study compared shear bond strength (SBS) of six self-adhesive resin cements (SARC) and one resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC) to zirconia before and after thermocycling. The cylinder shape (Φ 2.35 mm × 3 mm) of six SARCs (G-CEM LinkAce (GLA), Maxcem Elite (MAX), Clearfil SA Luting (CSL), PermaCem 2.0 (PM2), Rely-X U200 (RXU), Smartcem 2 (SC2)) were bonded to the top surface of the zirconia specimens with light-curing. RMGIC (Fujicem (FJC)) was bonded to the specimens with self-curing. The shear bond strength of all cemented specimens was measured with universal testing machine. Half of the specimens were thermocycled 5000 times before shear bonding strength testing. Fractured surfaces were examined with a field-emission SEM (10,000×) and analyzed by energy dispersive x-ray analysis. MAX, PM2, SC2 group without thermocycling and GLA, MAX, PM2 group with thermocycling showed adhesive failure, but GLA, CSL, RXU, FJC group without thermocycling and SLC, RXU, SC2, FJC group with thermocycling indicated cohesive failure. Within the limitation of this study, All of SARCs except MAX demonstrated higher bond strength than that of RMGIC regardless of thermocycling. Also, SARC containing MDP monomers (CSL) retained better bonds than other cements.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5455735
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54557352017-07-28 Comparative Shear-Bond Strength of Six Dental Self-Adhesive Resin Cements to Zirconia Lee, Si-Eun Bae, Ji-Hyeon Choi, Jae-Won Jeon, Yong-Chan Jeong, Chang-Mo Yoon, Mi-Jung Huh, Jung-Bo Materials (Basel) Article This study compared shear bond strength (SBS) of six self-adhesive resin cements (SARC) and one resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC) to zirconia before and after thermocycling. The cylinder shape (Φ 2.35 mm × 3 mm) of six SARCs (G-CEM LinkAce (GLA), Maxcem Elite (MAX), Clearfil SA Luting (CSL), PermaCem 2.0 (PM2), Rely-X U200 (RXU), Smartcem 2 (SC2)) were bonded to the top surface of the zirconia specimens with light-curing. RMGIC (Fujicem (FJC)) was bonded to the specimens with self-curing. The shear bond strength of all cemented specimens was measured with universal testing machine. Half of the specimens were thermocycled 5000 times before shear bonding strength testing. Fractured surfaces were examined with a field-emission SEM (10,000×) and analyzed by energy dispersive x-ray analysis. MAX, PM2, SC2 group without thermocycling and GLA, MAX, PM2 group with thermocycling showed adhesive failure, but GLA, CSL, RXU, FJC group without thermocycling and SLC, RXU, SC2, FJC group with thermocycling indicated cohesive failure. Within the limitation of this study, All of SARCs except MAX demonstrated higher bond strength than that of RMGIC regardless of thermocycling. Also, SARC containing MDP monomers (CSL) retained better bonds than other cements. MDPI 2015-06-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5455735/ http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma8063306 Text en © 2015 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Lee, Si-Eun
Bae, Ji-Hyeon
Choi, Jae-Won
Jeon, Yong-Chan
Jeong, Chang-Mo
Yoon, Mi-Jung
Huh, Jung-Bo
Comparative Shear-Bond Strength of Six Dental Self-Adhesive Resin Cements to Zirconia
title Comparative Shear-Bond Strength of Six Dental Self-Adhesive Resin Cements to Zirconia
title_full Comparative Shear-Bond Strength of Six Dental Self-Adhesive Resin Cements to Zirconia
title_fullStr Comparative Shear-Bond Strength of Six Dental Self-Adhesive Resin Cements to Zirconia
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Shear-Bond Strength of Six Dental Self-Adhesive Resin Cements to Zirconia
title_short Comparative Shear-Bond Strength of Six Dental Self-Adhesive Resin Cements to Zirconia
title_sort comparative shear-bond strength of six dental self-adhesive resin cements to zirconia
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5455735/
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma8063306
work_keys_str_mv AT leesieun comparativeshearbondstrengthofsixdentalselfadhesiveresincementstozirconia
AT baejihyeon comparativeshearbondstrengthofsixdentalselfadhesiveresincementstozirconia
AT choijaewon comparativeshearbondstrengthofsixdentalselfadhesiveresincementstozirconia
AT jeonyongchan comparativeshearbondstrengthofsixdentalselfadhesiveresincementstozirconia
AT jeongchangmo comparativeshearbondstrengthofsixdentalselfadhesiveresincementstozirconia
AT yoonmijung comparativeshearbondstrengthofsixdentalselfadhesiveresincementstozirconia
AT huhjungbo comparativeshearbondstrengthofsixdentalselfadhesiveresincementstozirconia