Cargando…
Comparative Shear-Bond Strength of Six Dental Self-Adhesive Resin Cements to Zirconia
This study compared shear bond strength (SBS) of six self-adhesive resin cements (SARC) and one resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC) to zirconia before and after thermocycling. The cylinder shape (Φ 2.35 mm × 3 mm) of six SARCs (G-CEM LinkAce (GLA), Maxcem Elite (MAX), Clearfil SA Luting (CSL...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5455735/ http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma8063306 |
_version_ | 1783241097822076928 |
---|---|
author | Lee, Si-Eun Bae, Ji-Hyeon Choi, Jae-Won Jeon, Yong-Chan Jeong, Chang-Mo Yoon, Mi-Jung Huh, Jung-Bo |
author_facet | Lee, Si-Eun Bae, Ji-Hyeon Choi, Jae-Won Jeon, Yong-Chan Jeong, Chang-Mo Yoon, Mi-Jung Huh, Jung-Bo |
author_sort | Lee, Si-Eun |
collection | PubMed |
description | This study compared shear bond strength (SBS) of six self-adhesive resin cements (SARC) and one resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC) to zirconia before and after thermocycling. The cylinder shape (Φ 2.35 mm × 3 mm) of six SARCs (G-CEM LinkAce (GLA), Maxcem Elite (MAX), Clearfil SA Luting (CSL), PermaCem 2.0 (PM2), Rely-X U200 (RXU), Smartcem 2 (SC2)) were bonded to the top surface of the zirconia specimens with light-curing. RMGIC (Fujicem (FJC)) was bonded to the specimens with self-curing. The shear bond strength of all cemented specimens was measured with universal testing machine. Half of the specimens were thermocycled 5000 times before shear bonding strength testing. Fractured surfaces were examined with a field-emission SEM (10,000×) and analyzed by energy dispersive x-ray analysis. MAX, PM2, SC2 group without thermocycling and GLA, MAX, PM2 group with thermocycling showed adhesive failure, but GLA, CSL, RXU, FJC group without thermocycling and SLC, RXU, SC2, FJC group with thermocycling indicated cohesive failure. Within the limitation of this study, All of SARCs except MAX demonstrated higher bond strength than that of RMGIC regardless of thermocycling. Also, SARC containing MDP monomers (CSL) retained better bonds than other cements. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5455735 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54557352017-07-28 Comparative Shear-Bond Strength of Six Dental Self-Adhesive Resin Cements to Zirconia Lee, Si-Eun Bae, Ji-Hyeon Choi, Jae-Won Jeon, Yong-Chan Jeong, Chang-Mo Yoon, Mi-Jung Huh, Jung-Bo Materials (Basel) Article This study compared shear bond strength (SBS) of six self-adhesive resin cements (SARC) and one resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC) to zirconia before and after thermocycling. The cylinder shape (Φ 2.35 mm × 3 mm) of six SARCs (G-CEM LinkAce (GLA), Maxcem Elite (MAX), Clearfil SA Luting (CSL), PermaCem 2.0 (PM2), Rely-X U200 (RXU), Smartcem 2 (SC2)) were bonded to the top surface of the zirconia specimens with light-curing. RMGIC (Fujicem (FJC)) was bonded to the specimens with self-curing. The shear bond strength of all cemented specimens was measured with universal testing machine. Half of the specimens were thermocycled 5000 times before shear bonding strength testing. Fractured surfaces were examined with a field-emission SEM (10,000×) and analyzed by energy dispersive x-ray analysis. MAX, PM2, SC2 group without thermocycling and GLA, MAX, PM2 group with thermocycling showed adhesive failure, but GLA, CSL, RXU, FJC group without thermocycling and SLC, RXU, SC2, FJC group with thermocycling indicated cohesive failure. Within the limitation of this study, All of SARCs except MAX demonstrated higher bond strength than that of RMGIC regardless of thermocycling. Also, SARC containing MDP monomers (CSL) retained better bonds than other cements. MDPI 2015-06-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5455735/ http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma8063306 Text en © 2015 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Lee, Si-Eun Bae, Ji-Hyeon Choi, Jae-Won Jeon, Yong-Chan Jeong, Chang-Mo Yoon, Mi-Jung Huh, Jung-Bo Comparative Shear-Bond Strength of Six Dental Self-Adhesive Resin Cements to Zirconia |
title | Comparative Shear-Bond Strength of Six Dental Self-Adhesive Resin Cements to Zirconia |
title_full | Comparative Shear-Bond Strength of Six Dental Self-Adhesive Resin Cements to Zirconia |
title_fullStr | Comparative Shear-Bond Strength of Six Dental Self-Adhesive Resin Cements to Zirconia |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative Shear-Bond Strength of Six Dental Self-Adhesive Resin Cements to Zirconia |
title_short | Comparative Shear-Bond Strength of Six Dental Self-Adhesive Resin Cements to Zirconia |
title_sort | comparative shear-bond strength of six dental self-adhesive resin cements to zirconia |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5455735/ http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma8063306 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT leesieun comparativeshearbondstrengthofsixdentalselfadhesiveresincementstozirconia AT baejihyeon comparativeshearbondstrengthofsixdentalselfadhesiveresincementstozirconia AT choijaewon comparativeshearbondstrengthofsixdentalselfadhesiveresincementstozirconia AT jeonyongchan comparativeshearbondstrengthofsixdentalselfadhesiveresincementstozirconia AT jeongchangmo comparativeshearbondstrengthofsixdentalselfadhesiveresincementstozirconia AT yoonmijung comparativeshearbondstrengthofsixdentalselfadhesiveresincementstozirconia AT huhjungbo comparativeshearbondstrengthofsixdentalselfadhesiveresincementstozirconia |