Cargando…
Microleakage of Different Self-Adhesive Materials for Lithium Disilicate CAD/CAM Crowns
Objectives: To evaluate the microleakage and marginal gap of various luting materials after cementing ceramic crowns. Methods: Cervical margins of human molars were designed as circular chamfers. Cementation of full-contour ceramic crowns was conducted with zinc-phosphate cement (Harvard cement), re...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5455752/ http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma8063238 |
_version_ | 1783241101725925376 |
---|---|
author | Naumova, Ella A. Valta, Alexander Schaper, Katharina Arnold, Wolfgang. H. Piwowarczyk, Andree |
author_facet | Naumova, Ella A. Valta, Alexander Schaper, Katharina Arnold, Wolfgang. H. Piwowarczyk, Andree |
author_sort | Naumova, Ella A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objectives: To evaluate the microleakage and marginal gap of various luting materials after cementing ceramic crowns. Methods: Cervical margins of human molars were designed as circular chamfers. Cementation of full-contour ceramic crowns was conducted with zinc-phosphate cement (Harvard cement), resin cement (Panavia F 2.0) and self-adhesive resin cements (RelyX Unicem, BifixSE, MaxCem Elite, PermaCem2.0, G-Cem). Aging of specimens was performed in artificial saliva, at 37 °C for four weeks and thermocycling. The marginal gap was measured with a scanning electron microscope and silver precipitation within the microleakage. All data were compared statistically. Results: Independent of the margin preparation, the highest median value for microleakage was 320.2 μm (Harvard cement), and the lowest was 0 μm (Panavia F 2.0). The median value for enamel was 0 µm and for dentin 270.9 μm (p < 0.001), which was independent of the luting material. The marginal and absolute marginal gaps were not significantly different between the tested materials. There was no correlation between microleakage and the marginal gaps. Conclusion: Significant differences in microleakage were found between the tested luting materials (p < 0.05). Independent from the luting materials, the microleakage in dentin showed significantly higher values than in enamel. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5455752 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54557522017-07-28 Microleakage of Different Self-Adhesive Materials for Lithium Disilicate CAD/CAM Crowns Naumova, Ella A. Valta, Alexander Schaper, Katharina Arnold, Wolfgang. H. Piwowarczyk, Andree Materials (Basel) Article Objectives: To evaluate the microleakage and marginal gap of various luting materials after cementing ceramic crowns. Methods: Cervical margins of human molars were designed as circular chamfers. Cementation of full-contour ceramic crowns was conducted with zinc-phosphate cement (Harvard cement), resin cement (Panavia F 2.0) and self-adhesive resin cements (RelyX Unicem, BifixSE, MaxCem Elite, PermaCem2.0, G-Cem). Aging of specimens was performed in artificial saliva, at 37 °C for four weeks and thermocycling. The marginal gap was measured with a scanning electron microscope and silver precipitation within the microleakage. All data were compared statistically. Results: Independent of the margin preparation, the highest median value for microleakage was 320.2 μm (Harvard cement), and the lowest was 0 μm (Panavia F 2.0). The median value for enamel was 0 µm and for dentin 270.9 μm (p < 0.001), which was independent of the luting material. The marginal and absolute marginal gaps were not significantly different between the tested materials. There was no correlation between microleakage and the marginal gaps. Conclusion: Significant differences in microleakage were found between the tested luting materials (p < 0.05). Independent from the luting materials, the microleakage in dentin showed significantly higher values than in enamel. MDPI 2015-06-03 /pmc/articles/PMC5455752/ http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma8063238 Text en © 2015 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Naumova, Ella A. Valta, Alexander Schaper, Katharina Arnold, Wolfgang. H. Piwowarczyk, Andree Microleakage of Different Self-Adhesive Materials for Lithium Disilicate CAD/CAM Crowns |
title | Microleakage of Different Self-Adhesive Materials for Lithium Disilicate CAD/CAM Crowns |
title_full | Microleakage of Different Self-Adhesive Materials for Lithium Disilicate CAD/CAM Crowns |
title_fullStr | Microleakage of Different Self-Adhesive Materials for Lithium Disilicate CAD/CAM Crowns |
title_full_unstemmed | Microleakage of Different Self-Adhesive Materials for Lithium Disilicate CAD/CAM Crowns |
title_short | Microleakage of Different Self-Adhesive Materials for Lithium Disilicate CAD/CAM Crowns |
title_sort | microleakage of different self-adhesive materials for lithium disilicate cad/cam crowns |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5455752/ http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma8063238 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT naumovaellaa microleakageofdifferentselfadhesivematerialsforlithiumdisilicatecadcamcrowns AT valtaalexander microleakageofdifferentselfadhesivematerialsforlithiumdisilicatecadcamcrowns AT schaperkatharina microleakageofdifferentselfadhesivematerialsforlithiumdisilicatecadcamcrowns AT arnoldwolfgangh microleakageofdifferentselfadhesivematerialsforlithiumdisilicatecadcamcrowns AT piwowarczykandree microleakageofdifferentselfadhesivematerialsforlithiumdisilicatecadcamcrowns |