Cargando…
Outcomes of Constrained Prostheses in Primary and Revision TKR
INTRODUCTION: The decision to use varus/valgus constrained or hinge knee prostheses in complex Total Knee Replacement (TKR) cases is difficult. There are few publications that compare survival rates, to aid this decision-making. This study compares the survival rates of unlinked fully constrained an...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5455848/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967117S00160 |
_version_ | 1783241114849902592 |
---|---|
author | Parkinson, Ben Lorimer, Michelle Lewis, Peter |
author_facet | Parkinson, Ben Lorimer, Michelle Lewis, Peter |
author_sort | Parkinson, Ben |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: The decision to use varus/valgus constrained or hinge knee prostheses in complex Total Knee Replacement (TKR) cases is difficult. There are few publications that compare survival rates, to aid this decision-making. This study compares the survival rates of unlinked fully constrained and hinge constrained prostheses in the primary and revision settings. METHODS: Data from the AOANJRR to 31(st) of December 2013 was analysed to determine the survival rate of unlinked and hinge constrained TKR in the primary and revision settings (excluding the diagnosis of tumour and infection). Only first-time revisions of a known primary TKR were included in the revision analysis. Kaplan-Meier estimates of survivorship were calculated for the two categories of constraint and were matched for age and diagnosis in both primary and revision TKR situations. Hazard ratios using the Cox proportional-hazards model were used. The survivorship of individual prosthesis models was determined. RESULTS: There were 3237 prostheses implanted during the study period that met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 1896 were for primary TKR and 1341 for revision TKR. There were 1349 unlinked fully constrained and 547 hinge prostheses for primary TKR and 991 unlinked fully constrained and 350 hinge prostheses for revision TKR. In both the primary and revision settings when matched by age, there was no difference in rates of revision for either level of constraint. When matched by indication in the primary setting, there was no difference in the rates of revision for either level of constraint. The rate of revision for both categories of constrained prosthesis was significantly higher in younger patients <55 years of age (p < 0.05). There were no differences in survival rates of individual models of constrained TKR. CONCLUSIONS: The survival rates of unlinked constrained and hinge knee prostheses are similar when matched by age or diagnosis. In complex TKR instability cases, surgeons should feel confident in choosing the appropriate prosthesis to gain a stable knee and need not be concerned that a hinge prosthesis may carry a higher revision rate. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5455848 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54558482017-06-12 Outcomes of Constrained Prostheses in Primary and Revision TKR Parkinson, Ben Lorimer, Michelle Lewis, Peter Orthop J Sports Med Article INTRODUCTION: The decision to use varus/valgus constrained or hinge knee prostheses in complex Total Knee Replacement (TKR) cases is difficult. There are few publications that compare survival rates, to aid this decision-making. This study compares the survival rates of unlinked fully constrained and hinge constrained prostheses in the primary and revision settings. METHODS: Data from the AOANJRR to 31(st) of December 2013 was analysed to determine the survival rate of unlinked and hinge constrained TKR in the primary and revision settings (excluding the diagnosis of tumour and infection). Only first-time revisions of a known primary TKR were included in the revision analysis. Kaplan-Meier estimates of survivorship were calculated for the two categories of constraint and were matched for age and diagnosis in both primary and revision TKR situations. Hazard ratios using the Cox proportional-hazards model were used. The survivorship of individual prosthesis models was determined. RESULTS: There were 3237 prostheses implanted during the study period that met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 1896 were for primary TKR and 1341 for revision TKR. There were 1349 unlinked fully constrained and 547 hinge prostheses for primary TKR and 991 unlinked fully constrained and 350 hinge prostheses for revision TKR. In both the primary and revision settings when matched by age, there was no difference in rates of revision for either level of constraint. When matched by indication in the primary setting, there was no difference in the rates of revision for either level of constraint. The rate of revision for both categories of constrained prosthesis was significantly higher in younger patients <55 years of age (p < 0.05). There were no differences in survival rates of individual models of constrained TKR. CONCLUSIONS: The survival rates of unlinked constrained and hinge knee prostheses are similar when matched by age or diagnosis. In complex TKR instability cases, surgeons should feel confident in choosing the appropriate prosthesis to gain a stable knee and need not be concerned that a hinge prosthesis may carry a higher revision rate. SAGE Publications 2017-05-31 /pmc/articles/PMC5455848/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967117S00160 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This open-access article is published and distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial - No Derivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/), which permits the noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction of the article in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. You may not alter, transform, or build upon this article without the permission of the Author(s). For reprints and permission queries, please visit SAGE’s Web site at http://www.sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav. |
spellingShingle | Article Parkinson, Ben Lorimer, Michelle Lewis, Peter Outcomes of Constrained Prostheses in Primary and Revision TKR |
title | Outcomes of Constrained Prostheses in Primary and Revision TKR |
title_full | Outcomes of Constrained Prostheses in Primary and Revision TKR |
title_fullStr | Outcomes of Constrained Prostheses in Primary and Revision TKR |
title_full_unstemmed | Outcomes of Constrained Prostheses in Primary and Revision TKR |
title_short | Outcomes of Constrained Prostheses in Primary and Revision TKR |
title_sort | outcomes of constrained prostheses in primary and revision tkr |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5455848/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967117S00160 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT parkinsonben outcomesofconstrainedprosthesesinprimaryandrevisiontkr AT lorimermichelle outcomesofconstrainedprosthesesinprimaryandrevisiontkr AT lewispeter outcomesofconstrainedprosthesesinprimaryandrevisiontkr |