Cargando…

The Effect on Long Term Survivorship of Surgeon Preference for Posterior Stabilized or Minimally Stabilized Total Knee Replacement: An Analysis of 63416 Cases from the AOANJRR

INTRODUCTION & AIMS: Controversy still exists as to the optimum management of the PCL in TKR, with registry data suggesting Posterior Stabilised TKR have a higher Cumulative Percent Revision (CPR) compared to Minimally Stabilised TKR. Proponents of PS TKR suggest this difference is due to select...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vertullo, Christopher, Lewis, Peter, Lorimer, Michelle, Graves, Stephen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5455854/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967117S00170
_version_ 1783241116488826880
author Vertullo, Christopher
Lewis, Peter
Lorimer, Michelle
Graves, Stephen
author_facet Vertullo, Christopher
Lewis, Peter
Lorimer, Michelle
Graves, Stephen
author_sort Vertullo, Christopher
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION & AIMS: Controversy still exists as to the optimum management of the PCL in TKR, with registry data suggesting Posterior Stabilised TKR have a higher Cumulative Percent Revision (CPR) compared to Minimally Stabilised TKR. Proponents of PS TKR suggest this difference is due to selection bias as result of preferential use of PS TKR in complex or more severe cases. To remove this selection bias, we aimed to compare CPR based on surgeon TKR stability preference to treat with PS or MS TKR rather than actual prosthesis type received. METHOD: Observational series. An analysis of AOANJRR data from 1999 – 2014 was utilized to identify two cohorts of high volume surgeons who preferred to use routinely either MS or PS TKR. Only fixed tibial inserts and patellar resurfacing TKR were included. A MS preferring surgeon used MS TKR at least 90% of the time and a PS preferring surgeon used PS TKR at least 90% of the time. Consequently, each patient cohort included both PS and MS TKR in differing proportions. RESULTS: Procedures undertaken by PS preferring surgeons had a significantly higher risk of revision (CPR (Hazard Ratio = 1.45 (95% CI 1.30, 1.63), p< 0.001). There was a higher rate of revision for loosening and infection in the PS group. Of the 39 941 TKR with cemented fixation of both femur and tibia, the PS preferring surgeons had a higher CPR than the MS preferring cohort (HR = 1.55 (1.33, 1.80), p< 0.001). Regardless of whether the polyethylene was crosslinked or non-crosslinked, the MS preferring surgeons had a lower CPR compared to the PS preferring surgeons. CONCLUSIONS: In this analysis, procedures undertaken by surgeons who mainly preferred to use PS TKR had a higher rate of revision than those that mainly used MS TKR. This finding was irrespective of patient age and was also evident when fixation and the type of polyethylene used was taken into account.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5455854
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-54558542017-06-12 The Effect on Long Term Survivorship of Surgeon Preference for Posterior Stabilized or Minimally Stabilized Total Knee Replacement: An Analysis of 63416 Cases from the AOANJRR Vertullo, Christopher Lewis, Peter Lorimer, Michelle Graves, Stephen Orthop J Sports Med Article INTRODUCTION & AIMS: Controversy still exists as to the optimum management of the PCL in TKR, with registry data suggesting Posterior Stabilised TKR have a higher Cumulative Percent Revision (CPR) compared to Minimally Stabilised TKR. Proponents of PS TKR suggest this difference is due to selection bias as result of preferential use of PS TKR in complex or more severe cases. To remove this selection bias, we aimed to compare CPR based on surgeon TKR stability preference to treat with PS or MS TKR rather than actual prosthesis type received. METHOD: Observational series. An analysis of AOANJRR data from 1999 – 2014 was utilized to identify two cohorts of high volume surgeons who preferred to use routinely either MS or PS TKR. Only fixed tibial inserts and patellar resurfacing TKR were included. A MS preferring surgeon used MS TKR at least 90% of the time and a PS preferring surgeon used PS TKR at least 90% of the time. Consequently, each patient cohort included both PS and MS TKR in differing proportions. RESULTS: Procedures undertaken by PS preferring surgeons had a significantly higher risk of revision (CPR (Hazard Ratio = 1.45 (95% CI 1.30, 1.63), p< 0.001). There was a higher rate of revision for loosening and infection in the PS group. Of the 39 941 TKR with cemented fixation of both femur and tibia, the PS preferring surgeons had a higher CPR than the MS preferring cohort (HR = 1.55 (1.33, 1.80), p< 0.001). Regardless of whether the polyethylene was crosslinked or non-crosslinked, the MS preferring surgeons had a lower CPR compared to the PS preferring surgeons. CONCLUSIONS: In this analysis, procedures undertaken by surgeons who mainly preferred to use PS TKR had a higher rate of revision than those that mainly used MS TKR. This finding was irrespective of patient age and was also evident when fixation and the type of polyethylene used was taken into account. SAGE Publications 2017-05-31 /pmc/articles/PMC5455854/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967117S00170 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This open-access article is published and distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial - No Derivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/), which permits the noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction of the article in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. You may not alter, transform, or build upon this article without the permission of the Author(s). For reprints and permission queries, please visit SAGE’s Web site at http://www.sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav.
spellingShingle Article
Vertullo, Christopher
Lewis, Peter
Lorimer, Michelle
Graves, Stephen
The Effect on Long Term Survivorship of Surgeon Preference for Posterior Stabilized or Minimally Stabilized Total Knee Replacement: An Analysis of 63416 Cases from the AOANJRR
title The Effect on Long Term Survivorship of Surgeon Preference for Posterior Stabilized or Minimally Stabilized Total Knee Replacement: An Analysis of 63416 Cases from the AOANJRR
title_full The Effect on Long Term Survivorship of Surgeon Preference for Posterior Stabilized or Minimally Stabilized Total Knee Replacement: An Analysis of 63416 Cases from the AOANJRR
title_fullStr The Effect on Long Term Survivorship of Surgeon Preference for Posterior Stabilized or Minimally Stabilized Total Knee Replacement: An Analysis of 63416 Cases from the AOANJRR
title_full_unstemmed The Effect on Long Term Survivorship of Surgeon Preference for Posterior Stabilized or Minimally Stabilized Total Knee Replacement: An Analysis of 63416 Cases from the AOANJRR
title_short The Effect on Long Term Survivorship of Surgeon Preference for Posterior Stabilized or Minimally Stabilized Total Knee Replacement: An Analysis of 63416 Cases from the AOANJRR
title_sort effect on long term survivorship of surgeon preference for posterior stabilized or minimally stabilized total knee replacement: an analysis of 63416 cases from the aoanjrr
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5455854/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967117S00170
work_keys_str_mv AT vertullochristopher theeffectonlongtermsurvivorshipofsurgeonpreferenceforposteriorstabilizedorminimallystabilizedtotalkneereplacementananalysisof63416casesfromtheaoanjrr
AT lewispeter theeffectonlongtermsurvivorshipofsurgeonpreferenceforposteriorstabilizedorminimallystabilizedtotalkneereplacementananalysisof63416casesfromtheaoanjrr
AT lorimermichelle theeffectonlongtermsurvivorshipofsurgeonpreferenceforposteriorstabilizedorminimallystabilizedtotalkneereplacementananalysisof63416casesfromtheaoanjrr
AT gravesstephen theeffectonlongtermsurvivorshipofsurgeonpreferenceforposteriorstabilizedorminimallystabilizedtotalkneereplacementananalysisof63416casesfromtheaoanjrr
AT vertullochristopher effectonlongtermsurvivorshipofsurgeonpreferenceforposteriorstabilizedorminimallystabilizedtotalkneereplacementananalysisof63416casesfromtheaoanjrr
AT lewispeter effectonlongtermsurvivorshipofsurgeonpreferenceforposteriorstabilizedorminimallystabilizedtotalkneereplacementananalysisof63416casesfromtheaoanjrr
AT lorimermichelle effectonlongtermsurvivorshipofsurgeonpreferenceforposteriorstabilizedorminimallystabilizedtotalkneereplacementananalysisof63416casesfromtheaoanjrr
AT gravesstephen effectonlongtermsurvivorshipofsurgeonpreferenceforposteriorstabilizedorminimallystabilizedtotalkneereplacementananalysisof63416casesfromtheaoanjrr