Cargando…
Inter-center comparison of EasyTube and endotracheal tube during general anesthesia in minor elective surgery
BACKGROUND: The EasyTube(®) (EzT) is a supraglottic airway device (SAD) enabling ventilation irrespective of its placement into the esophagus or trachea. Data obtained on SADs from multicenter studies, performed in highly specialized centers cannot always be transferred to other sites. However, data...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5456362/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28575056 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0178756 |
_version_ | 1783241238578724864 |
---|---|
author | Robak, Oliver Vaida, Sonia Somri, Mostafa Gaitini, Luis Füreder, Lisa Frass, Michael Szarpak, Lukasz |
author_facet | Robak, Oliver Vaida, Sonia Somri, Mostafa Gaitini, Luis Füreder, Lisa Frass, Michael Szarpak, Lukasz |
author_sort | Robak, Oliver |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The EasyTube(®) (EzT) is a supraglottic airway device (SAD) enabling ventilation irrespective of its placement into the esophagus or trachea. Data obtained on SADs from multicenter studies, performed in highly specialized centers cannot always be transferred to other sites. However, data on comparability of different sites are scarce. This study focused on inter-site variability of ventilatory and safety parameters during general anesthesia with the EzT. METHODS: 400 patients with ASA physical status I-II undergoing general anesthesia for elective surgery in four medical centers (EzT group (n = 200), ETT group (n = 200)). Mallampati classification, success of insertion, insertion time, duration of ventilation, number of insertion attempts, ease of insertion, tidal volumes, leakage, hemodynamic parameters, oxygenation, and complications rates with the EasyTube (EzT) or endotracheal tube (ETT) in comparison within the sites and in between the sites were recorded. RESULTS: Intra-site and inter-site comparison of insertion success as primary outcome did not differ significantly. The inter-site comparison of expiratory minute volumes showed that the volumes achieved over the course of anesthesia did not differ significantly, however, mean leakage at one site was significantly higher with the EzT (0.63 l/min, p = 0.02). No significant inter-site differences in heart rate, blood pressure, or oxygenation were observed. Sore throat and blood on the cuff after removal of the device were the most frequent complications with significantly more complications at one site with the EzT (p = 0.01) where insertion was also reported significantly more difficult (p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: Performance of the EzT but not the ETT varied between sites with regard to insertion difficulty, leakage, and complications but not insertion success, ventilation, hemodynamics, and oxygenation parameters in patients with ASA physical status 1–2 during general anesthesia undergoing minor elective surgery. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5456362 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-54563622017-06-12 Inter-center comparison of EasyTube and endotracheal tube during general anesthesia in minor elective surgery Robak, Oliver Vaida, Sonia Somri, Mostafa Gaitini, Luis Füreder, Lisa Frass, Michael Szarpak, Lukasz PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: The EasyTube(®) (EzT) is a supraglottic airway device (SAD) enabling ventilation irrespective of its placement into the esophagus or trachea. Data obtained on SADs from multicenter studies, performed in highly specialized centers cannot always be transferred to other sites. However, data on comparability of different sites are scarce. This study focused on inter-site variability of ventilatory and safety parameters during general anesthesia with the EzT. METHODS: 400 patients with ASA physical status I-II undergoing general anesthesia for elective surgery in four medical centers (EzT group (n = 200), ETT group (n = 200)). Mallampati classification, success of insertion, insertion time, duration of ventilation, number of insertion attempts, ease of insertion, tidal volumes, leakage, hemodynamic parameters, oxygenation, and complications rates with the EasyTube (EzT) or endotracheal tube (ETT) in comparison within the sites and in between the sites were recorded. RESULTS: Intra-site and inter-site comparison of insertion success as primary outcome did not differ significantly. The inter-site comparison of expiratory minute volumes showed that the volumes achieved over the course of anesthesia did not differ significantly, however, mean leakage at one site was significantly higher with the EzT (0.63 l/min, p = 0.02). No significant inter-site differences in heart rate, blood pressure, or oxygenation were observed. Sore throat and blood on the cuff after removal of the device were the most frequent complications with significantly more complications at one site with the EzT (p = 0.01) where insertion was also reported significantly more difficult (p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: Performance of the EzT but not the ETT varied between sites with regard to insertion difficulty, leakage, and complications but not insertion success, ventilation, hemodynamics, and oxygenation parameters in patients with ASA physical status 1–2 during general anesthesia undergoing minor elective surgery. Public Library of Science 2017-06-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5456362/ /pubmed/28575056 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0178756 Text en © 2017 Robak et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Robak, Oliver Vaida, Sonia Somri, Mostafa Gaitini, Luis Füreder, Lisa Frass, Michael Szarpak, Lukasz Inter-center comparison of EasyTube and endotracheal tube during general anesthesia in minor elective surgery |
title | Inter-center comparison of EasyTube and endotracheal tube during general anesthesia in minor elective surgery |
title_full | Inter-center comparison of EasyTube and endotracheal tube during general anesthesia in minor elective surgery |
title_fullStr | Inter-center comparison of EasyTube and endotracheal tube during general anesthesia in minor elective surgery |
title_full_unstemmed | Inter-center comparison of EasyTube and endotracheal tube during general anesthesia in minor elective surgery |
title_short | Inter-center comparison of EasyTube and endotracheal tube during general anesthesia in minor elective surgery |
title_sort | inter-center comparison of easytube and endotracheal tube during general anesthesia in minor elective surgery |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5456362/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28575056 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0178756 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT robakoliver intercentercomparisonofeasytubeandendotrachealtubeduringgeneralanesthesiainminorelectivesurgery AT vaidasonia intercentercomparisonofeasytubeandendotrachealtubeduringgeneralanesthesiainminorelectivesurgery AT somrimostafa intercentercomparisonofeasytubeandendotrachealtubeduringgeneralanesthesiainminorelectivesurgery AT gaitiniluis intercentercomparisonofeasytubeandendotrachealtubeduringgeneralanesthesiainminorelectivesurgery AT furederlisa intercentercomparisonofeasytubeandendotrachealtubeduringgeneralanesthesiainminorelectivesurgery AT frassmichael intercentercomparisonofeasytubeandendotrachealtubeduringgeneralanesthesiainminorelectivesurgery AT szarpaklukasz intercentercomparisonofeasytubeandendotrachealtubeduringgeneralanesthesiainminorelectivesurgery |