Cargando…
Systems for grading the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations I: Critical appraisal of existing approaches The GRADE Working Group
BACKGROUND: A number of approaches have been used to grade levels of evidence and the strength of recommendations. The use of many different approaches detracts from one of the main reasons for having explicit approaches: to concisely characterise and communicate this information so that it can easi...
Autores principales: | Atkins, David, Eccles, Martin, Flottorp, Signe, Guyatt, Gordon H, Henry, David, Hill, Suzanne, Liberati, Alessandro, O'Connell, Dianne, Oxman, Andrew D, Phillips, Bob, Schünemann, Holger, Edejer, Tessa Tan-Torres, Vist, Gunn E, Williams, John W |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2004
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC545647/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15615589 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-4-38 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Systems for grading the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations II: Pilot study of a new system
por: Atkins, David, et al.
Publicado: (2005) -
The GRADE Evidence to Decision (EtD) framework for health system and public health decisions
por: Moberg, Jenny, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Using GRADE in situations of emergencies and urgencies: certainty in evidence and recommendations matters during the COVID-19 pandemic, now more than ever and no matter what
por: Schünemann, Holger J., et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 9. Grading evidence and recommendations
por: Schünemann, Holger J, et al.
Publicado: (2006) -
Identifying barriers and tailoring interventions to improve the management of urinary tract infections and sore throat: a pragmatic study using qualitative methods
por: Flottorp, Signe, et al.
Publicado: (2003)